Anthony Raphael Kallarakkal vs Rajendra K. Bhuta & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 608-610 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The appeal against an order of the Adjudicating Authority under the I&B Code is barred by limitation where it is not presented within the period prescribed by sub-section (2) of Section 61 of the Code, and such a time-barred appeal cannot be entertained; the Tribunal therefore dismisses it without examining its merits.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 608-610 of 2018
IN THE MATTER OF:
Mr. Anthony Raphael Kallarakkal ...Appellant
Versus
Rajendra K. Bhuta & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant : Mr. Rajvardhan Singh, Advocate
For Respondents : Mr. Rajeev K. Panday, Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Mr. P. Srinivasan, Mr. Ashish Verma and Ms. Nishtha Sikroria and Ms. Sowmya Saikumar, Advocates
ORDER
12.11.2018 This appeal has been preferred by the appellant 'Mr. Anthony
Raphael Kallarakkal' against order dated 18th August, 2017; 5th April, 2018 and
18th July, 2018 along with petition for condonation of delay. Though the appeal
is against the orders dated 18th July, 2018 and 18th August, 2017 which are
hopelessly barred by limitation and cannot be entertained in view of sub-section
(2) of Section 61 of the I&B Code, in spite of the same, we have gone through the
impugned orders.
From the record we find that the 'corporate insolvency resolution process'
was initiated against the 'corporate debtor' pursuant to an application under
Section 7 of the I&B Code filed by 'The Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Limited'
(Financial Creditor). In the said case, the Miscellaneous Application was filed by
the 'Resolution Professional' with the prayer in respect of a property bearing Plot
No. 849, Road No. 9, Kalamboli, Panvel, District Rajgad, admeasuring 900 sq. -2-
mtrs. which was valued Rs. 1.79 Crores. In the declaration of Liquidation, he
advertised the same in the newspaper but due to obstruction from the side of
the others, the complaint was made before the Police. The Adjudicating
Authority by order dated 18th July, 2018 observed that the promoters and
Directors if obstructing the commencement of liquidation, they will be liable to
penal consequences as prescribed for punishment under Chapter-VII of the
Code.
From the order dated 18th August, 2017, we find that the application which
was filed on 9th June, 2017 under Section 7 of the I&B Code was admitted on
the said date and the order of moratorium was passed. The appellant could not
make it clear as to how the order of liquidation was passed earlier if the
application under Section 7 filed by 'Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Limited'
admitted on 18th August, 2017.
It appears that the order dated 18th August, 2017 passed by the
Adjudicating Authority was challenged before the Adjudicating Authority by filing
a Miscellaneous Application No. 239 /2018. It was submitted that the order was
passed in violation of rules of natural justice. However, taking into consideration
the earlier record, while the Adjudicating Authority held that there is 'debt' and
'default', further observed that the order passed earlier cannot be reviewed or
recalled in absence of any provision. The Miscellaneous Application was rejected
by order dated 5th April, 2018. The said order was handed over to the 'Corporate
Debtor' on 17th September, 2018 whereinafter this appeal has been filed. But it
appears that the appeal before this Tribunal was presented on 11th September,
2018 that is prior to issuance of the certified copy of the order. There is an -3-
ambiguity as to how a certified copy issued on 17th September, 2018 have been
enclosed in the appeal filed by the 'Corporate Debtor' on 11th September, 2018.
In absence of any explanation, we are not deciding the merit.
For the said reason without going into the merit of the case and the appeal
being barred by limitation is dismissed. No cost.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial) /ns/uk/
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free