Anand Gupta & Another vs Vardhman Realtech Private Limited
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1065 of 2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellant, being a co-participant in a joint venture holding a 19% shareholding and not a lender of money disbursed against the time value of money, does not hold a "financial debt" within the meaning of the Code, and an application under Section 7 founded on such a relationship cannot be entertained. Observations made by the Adjudicating Authority on a matter not necessary to the dismissal of the Section 7 application do not bind or prejudice the Appellant in pursuing any remedy available to him in accordance with law.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Anand Gupta & Anr. ...Appellant
Versus
Vardhman Realtech Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Tarun Singla, K.C. Joshi, Advocates For Respondent:
ORDER
16.08.2023: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant.
2. This Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 09th May, 2023 by
which order the Application filed under Section 7 of I&B Code, 2016 has been
rejected.
3. The Appellant has filed the Application under Section 7 claiming to be
financial debt due and payable by the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating
Authority took the view that a Letter of Intent was issued in which both the
parties were Joint Venture Partners and there was no financial debt to enable
the Appellant to proceed under Section 7 of the Code. It is noted that under
Letter of Intent dated 09.03.2016 theAppellant has 19% shareholding of the
Joint Venture Partners and the balance lay with the Corporate Debtor. -2-
4. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted that the Adjudicating
Authority while recording findings have also returned a finding in Paragraph
12(d) with regard to payment made by Ambaashree in relation to project which
may affect the Appellant when the appropriate remedy is availed by the
Appellant to protect his interest.
5. Having heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant, we are of the view that
in so far as finding of the Adjudicating Authority that both the parties being a
joint venture partners and Appellant has 19% shareholding, there was no
financial debt hence the Application under Section 7 of the Code could not be
entertained. We see no error. We however are of the view that observations
made in the order in paragraph 12(d) of the order shall not come in the way of
the Appellant when any remedy is availed by the Appellant for protecting the
interest of the Appellant in accordance with law.
With these observations, we dismiss the Appeal.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Mr. Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
Basant/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1065/2023
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free