Amudha Priya Ramesh , Chennai vs Assessee
- CitationITA No.2729/Mds/2014
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Obtaining Form 15-J/15-I from the payee within the period prescribed under Rule 29D(3) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 is mandatory; filing those forms with the concerned authority is not mandatory within that period, and is only directory/discretionary, so that filing before completion of assessment constitutes sufficient compliance. Where the assessee establishes that Form 15-J/15-I was obtained before the prescribed date, no disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is warranted on account of the late filing of the forms, and the Assessing Officer must verify the genuineness of the forms before deciding the issue.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of
the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Chennai, dated
22.07.2014 and pertains to assessment year 2010-11. 2 I.T.A. No.2729/Mds/14
2. Shri C. Ramesh Kumar, the Ld. representative for the
assessee, submitted that the assessee is engaged in the business
of earth moving contract. According to the Ld. representative, the
assessee hired lorries and paid the hire charges. Since the
recipients of the hire charges filed Form 15J, according to the Ld.
representative, the assessee has not deducted tax as required
under the Income-tax Act. However, the Assessing Officer
disallowed the claim of the assessee on the ground that as per Rule
29D(3) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the assessee is expected to
file Form 15J on or before 30.06.2010 but, in this case, according to
the Ld. representative, the assessee filed the Forms only on
08.02.2013. The Ld. representative submitted that however, the
15J Forms were collected from the recipients before 30.06.2010.
The delay was only in filing the Forms before the concerned
authority and not in collecting the Forms. The Ld. representative
also filed copies of Form 15J/15-I before this Tribunal.
3. On the contrary, Shri A.V. Sreekanth, submitted that the
assessee is expected to file Form 15J and Form 15-I on or before
30.06.2010. However, these were filed only on 8.02.2013, beyond
the period prescribed under the Income-tax Rules. Therefore, the
Assessing Officer found that there was failure on the part of the 3 I.T.A. No.2729/Mds/14
assessee for non-deduction of tax. Accordingly, the payment of hire
charges was disallowed under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax
Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') and the CIT(Appeals) has rightly
confirmed the addition.
4. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and
perused the relevant material on record. We have also carefully
gone through the provisions of Rule 29D(3) of Income-tax Rules,
1962. The Rule clearly says that the assessee has to file Form 15-J
on or before 30.06.2010. However, admittedly, these Forms were
filed only on 08.02.2013. The assessee now claims that all the 15-J
and 15-I Forms were obtained before 30.06.2010. This Tribunal is
of the considered opinion that Form 15-J/15-I has to be filed before
the lower authorities before completion of assessment proceedings
in order to verify the collection/payment of taxes by the respective
assessees. Admittedly, the assessee now claims that the Forms
were obtained from the recipients of the amount before 30.06.2010.
This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that obtaining Form15-
J/15-I is mandatory within the time period. However, filing before
the concerned authority is only discretionary. If the assessee files
the 15-J/15-I Forms before completion of assessment, then there
will be sufficient compliance. The assessee now filed copies of 4 I.T.A. No.2729/Mds/14
Form 15-I before this Tribunal. However, genuineness of the Forms
filed before this Tribunal is not verified by any of the authorities.
Therefore, the orders of the lower authorities are set aside. The
entire issue is remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer. The
Assessing Officer shall verify the genuineness and otherwise of 15-
J/15-I Forms filed by the assessee and thereafter decide the issue
afresh, after giving reasonable opportunity to the assessee. We
make it clear that if the assessee obtained the 15-J/15-I Forms
before 30.06.2010, then there is no need for any disallowance
under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. In other words, it has to be
treated as sufficient compliance of Rule 29D(3) of the Income-tax
Rules, 1962.
5. With the above observation, the appeal of the assessee is
allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 19th June, 2015 at Chennai.
sd/- sd/- (A.Mohan Alankamony) (N.R.S. Ganesan) (ए. मोहन अलंकामणी) (एन.आर.एस. गणेशन) लेखा सद य/Accountant Member या यक सद य/Judicial Member
चे नई/Chennai, th 4दनांक/Dated, the 19 June, 2015. Kri. 5 I.T.A. No.2729/Mds/14
आदे श क. , त5ल6प अ7े6षत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ+/Appellant 2. ,-यथ+/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु8त (अपील)/CIT(A)-II, Chennai 4. आयकर आयु8त/CIT-VII, Chennai 5. 6वभागीय , त न ध/DR 6. गाड' फाईल/GF.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free