Aliasgar Mohammed Lokhandwala vs Dalmia Group Holdings
- CitationCompany Appeal(AT)(Insolvency) No. 1060 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a settlement between the corporate debtor's appellant-shareholder and the financial creditor is reached and reduced to writing before the Committee of Creditors is constituted, the Appellate Tribunal may, in exercise of its power under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016, set aside the order admitting the corporate insolvency resolution process and release the corporate debtor from the rigours of the insolvency process, on the appellant's undertaking to pay the admitted fee and costs of the Interim Resolution Professional.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Aliasgar Mohammed Lokhandwala ...Appellant
Vs
Dalmia Group Holdings ....Respondent Present:
For Appellant: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Yusuf Iqbal Yusuf, Mr. Bhavya Sethi and Ms. Anvee Mehta Advocates.
Ms. Gyanika Kochar, Advocate
For Respondent: Mr. Shikhil Suri, Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri and Ms. Shilpa Saini, Advocates.
Mr. Vikky Dang, Advocate for IRP.
Mr. Tarun Mehta, Advocate for Intervener.
ORDER
16.10.2019 Dalmia Group Holdings (Financial Creditor) filed an
application under Section 7 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2017 (in short
'IBC') against 'Lokhandwala Kataria Construction Private Limited' (Corporate
Debtor) which has been admitted by impugned order dated 19th September, 2019
passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai
Bench.
Mr. Arun Kathpalia, learned Sr. Counsel for the Appellant
Director/Shareholder submits that before constitution of 'Committee of
Creditors', the parties had reached a terms of settlement on 10.10.2019 and the
written terms of settlement has been signed today, on 16.10.2019, a copy of
which has been filed.
Company Appeal(AT)(Ins) No. 1060 of 2019 Page 1 of 2
The aforesaid fact has also been accepted by Ms. Shilpi Saini, learned
Counsel appearing on behalf of Dalmia Group Holdings (Financial Creditor).
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellant will pay the
admitted fee and cost of the Interim Resolution Professional.
One Mr. Vikky Dang, Advocate appeared on behalf of the Interim
Resolution Professional when the matter was taken up. However, in view of the
fact that the Appellant has admitted to the pay the Resolution cost and fee of the
Interim Resolution Professional, no reply affidavit required to be filed by the
Interim Resolution Professional.
In view of aforesaid developments and as terms of settlement has been
reached between the Appellant and the Financial Creditor prior to the
constitution of 'Committee of Creditors', this Appellate Tribunal in exercise of
power conferred by Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules 2016, set aside the impugned
order dated 19.09.2019 passed in CP(IB) No. 1024/NCLT/MB/2019. The
Corporate Debtor(Company) is released from all the rigour of law and is allowed
to function independently through its Board of Directors from immediate effect.
The Interim Resolution Professional will hand over the records and the premises
of the Corporate Debtor on receipt of fee and cost.
The appeal is allowed with the aforesaid observations and directions. No
cost.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
(Kanthi Narahari) Member(Technical) Akc/Sk
Company Appeal(AT)(Ins) No. 1060 of 2019 Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free