Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Akash Harishbhai Desai vs Sebi

Securities Appellate Tribunal8 November 2017J.P. Devadhar

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The impugned order of the Adjudicating Officer, passed without giving the affected parties an opportunity to file a reply or be heard, cannot stand; an order passed in breach of the requirement of an opportunity of hearing is set aside, and the authority is directed to decide afresh after affording the parties a hearing following their filing of replies within a fixed time.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Date of Decision : 08/11/2017

Appeal No.320 of 2017

Akash Harishbhai Desai C-1, Sonal Apartment, Maruti Nagar, Airport Road, Rajkot - 360 001. ... Appellant

Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No.C4-A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ... Respondent

Mr. Pesi Modi, Senior Advocate a/w Kunal Katariya, Ms. Dhanyashree Shah and Ms. Ashita Gulati, Advocates i/b AZB & Partners for the Appellant.

Mr. Pradeep Sancheti, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Mihir Mody and Mr. Nishant Upadhyay, Advocates i/b K. Ashar & Co. for the Respondent.

CORAM : Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Jog Singh, Member Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member

Per : Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral)

1.

Not on board. Taken up by consent of both the parties.

2. This appeal is filed to challenge the order passed by the

Adjudicating Officer ("AO" for short) of Securities and Exchange Board

of India (for short, "SEBI") on 27th October, 2017. 2

3. As it is the case of the appellant that the impugned order is

passed without giving an opportunity to the appellant and other parties

to file their reply and the said order is passed without giving an

opportunity of personal hearing, Counsel for SEBI, on instruction states

that SEBI is ready and willing to pass appropriate order after giving an

opportunity of hearing to the parties provided the parties to the

impugned order file their respective reply within the time stipulated by

this Tribunal.

4. In these circumstances, we set aside the impugned order and

permit the appellant and other parties against whom the impugned

order is passed to submit their reply within three weeks from today.

Thereafter SEBI shall pass fresh order after giving an opportunity of

hearing to all the parties.

5. Appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

Sd/-

Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer

Sd/-

Jog Singh Member

Sd/-

Dr. C.K.G. Nair Member

08/11/2017 Prepared & compared by-dg

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free