Ajay Singal vs Gaurav Katiyar & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 676 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellate Tribunal may, in the exercise of its power to dispose of an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, permit a corporate debtor to complete an real estate project under the supervision of the Interim Resolution Professional on the basis of a settlement proposal placed before it, where the creditors, having been allowed to vote on that proposal, have approved it by the requisite majority and the proposal is in the terms affirmed by the proposer, and the Tribunal has accordingly accepted the request and disposed of the appeal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 676 of 2022 & I.A. No. 4972, 4946 of 2022 & 91, 92, 164, 4029 of 2023
IN THE MATTER OF: Ajay Singal ...Appellant
Versus
Gaurav Katiyar ...Respondents Interim Resolution Professional of GRJ Distributers and Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Vivek Kohli, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Bhuraria, Mr. Monish Surendran, Mr. Juvas Rawal, Ms. Nishtha Grover, Advocates along with Mr. Ajay Singal. For Respondents: Mr. Sanjeev Singh & Ms. Taniya Bansal, Advocates for R-48. Mr. Gaurav Katiyar (IRP in person) & Mr. Rishabh Jain, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Piyush Singh, Mr. Vivek Kumar, Mr. Jayant Upadhyay, Advocates for R-2 to 47.
ORDER
(Hybrid Mode)
Per: Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Oral)
18.03.2024: This appeal is filed by Suspended Director of the Corporate
Debtor against the order dated 03.06.2022 passed by Adjudicating Authority
(National Company Law Tribunal, Court-III) in CP (IB) No. 1066/ND/2020
registered on an application filed under Section 7 by Devinder Yadav & Ors.
(Financial Creditor) for the resolution of their debt.
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 676 of 2022 -2-
2. The application was admitted, Gaurav Kataria was appointed as the IRP
and the moratorium was imposed.
3. In this appeal the appellant has impleaded Gaurav Kataria as
Respondent No. 1, Homebuyers from Respondent No. 2 to 47, however, Tata
Capital Housing Finance Ltd. was impleaded as Respondent No. 48 by an order
of this Court.
4. Shorn of unnecessary details, during the pendency of this appeal, the
appellant filed an I.A. No. 546/2024 in which two prayers were made:
"a) To allow the unsecured financial creditors (financial creditors in a class)- namely, the allottees of the Avalon Regal Court Project of the Corporate Debtor, and the secured financial creditor -
namely, Tata Capital Housing Financial Limited, to vote on the Project Completion Proposal filed vide Affidavit dated 24.08.2023 and further settlement terms given in the affidavits filed on 04.09.2023 and 23.12.2023 by the Appellant, the contents of which are also reproduced in the current application;
b) If, the voting in terms of (a) above is in favour of the Project Completion Proposal, to allow the Appellant / Applicant to implement the Project Completion Proposal as filed before this Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal vide Affidavit dated 24.08.2023 and further settlement terms given in the affidavits filed on 04.09.2023 and 23.12.2023; and also reproduced in the current application, for completion of the Avalon Regal Court Project of the Corporate Debtor under the aegis of the Interim Resolution Professional and this Hon'ble Tribunal on the principles of "Reverse CIRP" as propounded by this Hon'ble Tribunal;"
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 676 of 2022 -3-
5. Vide order dated 27.02.2024, the following order was passed:
"I.A. No. 546 of 2024 This application is filed by the Appellant invoking Rule 11 of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rule, 2016 for the following relief :-
"To allow the unsecured financial creditors (financial creditors in a class)- namely, the allottees of the Avalon Regal Court Project of the Corporate Debtor, and the secured financial creditor - namely, Tata Capital Housing Financial Limited, to vote on the Project Completion Proposal filed vide Affidavit dated 24.08.2023 and further settlement terms given in the affidavits filed on 04.09.2023 and 23.12.2023 by the Appellant, the contents of which are also reproduced in the current application;"
Notice in the application. Shri Rishabh Jain appears on behalf of Respondent No. 1, Mr. Vivek Kumar appears on behalf of Respondent No. 2 to 47, Mr. Sanjeev Singh for Respondent No. 48 accepts notice in Court and submits that they do not want to file any Reply to the Application.
Counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellant has filed three Affidavits, namely, Affidavit dated 24th August, 2023 for the purpose of voting on the Project Completion Proposal and Affidavits dated 4th September, 2023 and 23rd December, 2023 for further settlement terms.
It is submitted that the Tribunal, on an application bearing I.A. No. 136/ 2024, filed by Respondent No. 1, has appointed Mr. Shyam Arora as the Authorised Representative (in short 'AR') of the allottees of Avalon Regal Court Project.
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 676 of 2022 -4-
It is submitted that the AR and the Secured Creditor (Tata Capital Housing Financial Limited) may be allowed to vote on the Project Completion Proposal which has been made through Affidavit dated 24th August, 2023 and also further settlement terms which have been given in the Affidavits dated 4th September, 2023 and 23rd December, 2023.
The prayer made in the application and submitted before us is not opposed by the Respondents herein.
Thus, in view thereof, the application, in so far as the aforesaid prayer is concerned, is hereby allowed and the AR of the allottees of Avalon Regal Court Project of the Corporate Debtor as well as the Secured Financial Creditor, namely, Tata Capital Housing Financial Limited are permitted to vote on the Project Completion Proposal 24th August, 2023 and also further settlement terms which are given on 4th September, 2023 and 23rd December, 2023.
Let the needful be done within two weeks. The formality shall be carried out by Respondent No. 1 for holding the meeting and e-voting.
After the e-voting, Respondent No. 1 shall file compliance report to this Court with copy to the parties concerned.
It is needless to mention that the prayer 'b' shall be considered only after perusing the Report of Respondent No.1. The prayer (b) is reproduced herein under :-
"b. If, the voting in terms of (a) above is in favour of the Project Completion Proposal, to allow the Appellant / Applicant to implement the Project Completion Proposal as filed before this Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal vide Affidavit dated 24.08.2023 and further settlement terms given in the affidavits filed on 04.09.2023 and
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 676 of 2022 -5-
23.12.2023; and also reproduced in the current application, for completion of the Avalon Regal Court Project of the Corporate Debtor under the aegis of the Interim Resolution Professional and this Hon'ble Tribunal on the principles of "Reverse CIRP" as propounded by this Hon'ble Tribunal;"
Adjourned to 18th March, 2024."
6. In compliance of the aforesaid order, the Respondent No.1 has filed the
compliance affidavit dated 14.03.2024 in which it is averred that:
"The Chairman requested the creditors to kindly exercise their discretion (through e-voting) on the settlement proposal based on their assessment and evaluation.
The Authorised Representative informed the IRP on 13.03.2024 (at 07:39 PM through email) that financial creditors in class have casted their votes and the response on the given agenda item is as under:
Agree : 99% Disagree : 1%
Accordingly, Authorized Representative casted the vote on behalf of Real estate allottees, in accordance with the provisions of section 25A(3) of IBC' 2016.
Voting window was provided by the IRP to the creditors from 10.03.2024 at 07:00 PM till 13.03.2024 at 10:00 PM, Votes casted be creditors are as under:
Name of Creditors Agree Disagree Authorized Representative: Financial Creditor 54.3% - in class (Real Estate Allottees) Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd. 45.7% - Total 100.0% -
The resolution passed by the creditors with 100% majority."
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 676 of 2022 -6-
7. The resolutions having been passed by the Resolution Professional and
Authorized Representative are also reproduced as under:
"VOTING ON THE SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL GIVEN BY MR. AJAY SINGAL -EX-DIRECTOR OF "CORPORATE DEBTOR" BEFORE HON'BLE NCLAT VIDE AFFIDAVITS DATED 24.08.2023, 04.09.2023 AND 23.12.2023:
"RESOLVED THAT, consent of the creditors of Avalon Regal Court Project, Bhiwadi, Rajasthan, be and is hereby granted for the approval of the Resolution Plan submitted vide Affidavit dated 24.08.2023 and further settlement terms given in the affidavits filed on 04.09.2023 and 23.12.2023 by Mr. Ajay Singal for resolution of the Avalon Regal Court Project, Bhiwadi, Rajasthan which is also reiterated in I.A. No. 546 of 2024 filed before the Hon'ble NCLAT.
FURTHER RESOLVED that the creditors of Avalon Regal Court Project, Bhiwadi agree to be bound by the terms of the Resolution Plan submitted by Mr. Ajay Singal vide Affidavit dated 24.08.2023 and further settlement terms given in the affidavits filed on 04.09.2023 and 23.12.2023 for resolution of the Avalon Regal Court Project, Bhiwadi, Rajasthan which is also reiterated in I.A. No. 546 of 2024 filed before the Hon'ble NCLAT.
Agree : 100% Disagree : 0%"
8. The compliance report is taken on record.
9. Senior Counsel has now submitted that the Prayer (b) made in the said
application (I.A. No. 546/2024) may be considered at this stage which in fact
was dependent upon the success of Prayer (a) of the said application about
which it is submitted that the resolution has been passed by both the
stakeholders with 100% voting rights for the completion of the project.
10. Thus, in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the Prayer (b) is
now considered. The Corporate Debtor is allowed to complete the project under
the guidance of the IRP, in terms of the affidavit filed on 24.08.2023,
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 676 of 2022 -7-
04.09.2023 and 23.12.2023 and also on the principles of reverse CIRP which
has been propounded by this Tribunal in the case of "Flat Buyers Association
Vs. Umang Realtech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors."
11. The request has been made by the appellant is hereby accepted and as a
result thereof, the present appeal is hereby disposed of. Liberty is given to the
concerned parties to approach this Court in case of any difficulty faced in
completion of the project but the parties shall have to file their application
before the NCLT for the purpose of compliances and the RP shall file its report
after the completion of the project.
[Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain] Member (Judicial)
[Mr. Naresh Salecha] Member (Technical)
[Mr. Indevar Pandey] Member (Technical)
sa/rr
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 676 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free