Agrawal Poly Plast Private Limited vs Star Lamipacks Private Limited
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 530 of 2021
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where the operational creditor relies on written acknowledgments of debt by the corporate debtor to save limitation under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the period of limitation is extended under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and a fresh period runs from the date of the last such acknowledgment; an application filed within three years of that acknowledgment is therefore not barred by time. Where the adjudicating authority has rejected a Section 9 application as time-barred without referring to acknowledgments of debt on the record, including periodic confirmations of account issued by the corporate debtor, that rejection is an error and the order is liable to be set aside and the application revived for consideration of admission.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Agrawal Poly Plast Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Star Lamipacks Pvt. Ltd. Respondent
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Advocate.
For Respondent:
ORDER
(Virtual Mode)
09.03.2022: Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. None has
appeared on behalf of the Respondent although notice has been served. The
Affidavit of Service in compliance of the order dated 06.12.2021 has also been
filed on 04.03.2022.
2. This Appeal has been filed against order dated 20.03.2020 passed by
the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Indore Bench at
Ahmedabad Court 1 by which the application filed by the Appellant under
Section 9 has been rejected as barred by time.
3. The Appellant has filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency
and the Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as 'Code') on
04.06.2018 claiming total debt due of Rs.81,59,742/- comprising of
Rs.30,27,622/- as Principal Amount and rest as interest. The aforesaid
amount was claimed out of the bills and invoices which have been noticed in
Part IV of the application. It was stated in the application that last payment
was received on 09.07.2014 of Rs.2 Lakhs. The application also has
Cont'd.../ 2
mentioned about the confirmation of balance, acknowledgment of due to the
Operational Creditor by the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating Authority by
the impugned order dismissed the application. Para 14 of the impugned order
contains the observations of the Adjudicating Authority on basis of which
application was held as barred by time, which is to the following effect:
" OBSERVATIONS
14.
14.1 The Operational Creditor has filed Application for the Operational Debt default of Principal amount of INR.30,27,622.00 along with interest and Sales Tax Due.
14.2 The Operational Creditor has submitted the invoices in support of its claim but those invoices are from 19.04.2010 to 11.07.2011 which are almost 7 years old at the time of filing the Application.
14.3 Date of default is 16.02.2011. 14.4 One Payment of INR.2,00,000.00 has been received by the Operational Creditor on 09.07.2014 but the Application has been filed on 07.06.2018 which is beyond the Limitation period. There is no such written communication/clear acknowledgement of debts between the date of default i.e., 16.02.2011 till payment made on 09.07.2014, which is beyond three years.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 530 of 2021 3
4. Learned counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that Appellant in
his application under Section 9 already made mention of the acknowledgment
which was given by the Corporate Debtor and last acknowledgment dated
31.05.2016 was specifically mentioned in the application. It is submitted that
the Corporate Debtor has continuously given acknowledgment in each year
which Account Confirmation has been brought on the record as Annexure A-
6 from the year 2010 till 2016.
5. We may notice the Part IV of the application where following statement
has been made recording the acknowledgment of debt of Rs.30,27,622/-:
"Accordingly, an amount of INR 30,27,622/- as
confirmed/ acknowledged by the Corporate Debtor is
still outstanding against the Corporate Debtor along
with interest at 2% due form the 31st day of the date of
respective unpaid invoices. Confirmation of balance/
Acknowledgement due to the Operational Creditor by
the Corporate Debtor dated 31.05.2016 of the principal
amount of operational debt of INR 30,27,622/- is
attached as Annexure -E."
6. It is well settled that on acknowledgment by Corporate Debtor of the
debt limitation is extended as per Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that confirmation of account sent
by the Corporate Debtor from 01.04.2010 to 31.05.2016 were on the record of
the Adjudicating Authority where the debt of Rs.30,27,622/- was mentioned
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 530 of 2021 4
while confirming the account by the Corporate Debtor. The last confirmation
of account being issued on 31.05.2016 for the period 01.04.2016 to
30.05.2016, we are of the view that the Appellant can clearly claim the benefit
of Section 18 of the Limitation Act and application having been filed within
three years from the last letter of acknowledgment on 31.05.2016 the
application was well within time. The Adjudicating Authority has not referred
to the acknowledgment i.e. confirmation of accounts, which letters were issued
by the Corporate Debtor and which were on the record of the Adjudicating
Authority. The confirmation of account letters issued by the Corporate Debtor
to the Operational Creditor clearly extend the period of limitation for the
Appellant to file application under Section 9. We, thus, are of the view that
the Adjudicating Authority committed error in rejecting the application as
barred by time. The order impugned dated 20.03.2020 is set aside.
Application under section 9 being C.P.(IB) No. 319/9/NCLT/AHM/2018 is
revived before the Adjudicating Authority. The Adjudicating Authority after
issuing notice to the Appellant may pass an order for admission of the
application within a period of six weeks from the date copy of this order is
produced before the Adjudicating Authority. Parties shall be at liberty to enter
into settlement before the aforesaid date. Appeal is allowed accordingly.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Dr. Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical) Archana/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 530 of 2021
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free