Agarwal Coal Corporation Private ... vs Sun Paper Mill Limited & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 412 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
At the stage of admitting an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Adjudicating Authority is required only to determine whether the record is complete and whether there is a debt and a default; it is not required to verify the quantum of the claim, which is a matter for the Resolution Professional to collate and validate. Accordingly, the admission of an application is not vitiated merely because the amount later found payable on verification is below the statutory threshold, and even where the claim amount is disputed and exceeds Rupees One Lakh, the application is to be admitted.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Agarwal Coal Corporation Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Sun Paper Mill Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Varsha Banerjee, Mr. Milan Singh Negi, Mr. Akshat Singh, Mr. Raza Abbay and Ms. Aliya Durafshan, Advocates
For 1st Respondent: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Madhusmita Bora, Ms. Synola Mohapatra and Mr. G. Ashoka Pathy, Advocates
For 2nd Respondent : Mr. Krishnendu Datta and Mr. Vineet Ranjan, Advocates
ORDER
16.10.2019 The Appellant - 'Agarwal Coal Corporation Private Limited'
('Operational Creditor') filed a claim before the 'Interim Resolution
Professional' / 'Resolution Professional'. However, in the 'resolution plan'
submitted by the 'Corporate Debtor', which is a 'Micro, Small & Medium
Enterprises', allowed a sum of Rs. 2173 in favour of the Appellant. The said
'resolution plan' was filed on 16th October, 2018 and approved. This appeal 2
is in subsequent M.A. No. 677/2018 filed later and Interim Order dated 14th
March, 2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law
Tribunal), Division Bench, Chennai, the Appellant ('Operational Creditor') has
challenged the same.
2. According to the Appellant, the total claim amount as was
Rs, 2,39,33,,935 which was filed before the 'Resolution Professional' related
to the supply of coal from November, 2013 to February, 2014. Learned
counsel for the Appellant submitted that the related invoices and agreements
were also enclosed along with the claim.
3. Further, according to the learned counsel for the Appellant, in view of
the claim amount of Rs. 2,39,33,935 shown in the Form 5 (Application under
Section 9), the 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process' was initiated against
the 'Corporate Debtor' at the instance of the Appellant.
4. It is submitted that the claim amount being more than Rupees One
Lakh, the Adjudicating Authority admitted the application under Section 9
and therefore, it is not open to the 'Resolution Professional' or the 'Corporate
Debtor' to suggest that the amount is Rs. 2173.
5. Reliance has been placed on the e-mail dated 2nd November, 2018
issued by the 'Resolution Professional' to the Appellant to suggest that the
aforesaid claim amount was collated and validated by the 'Resolution
Applicant', which reads as under:
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 412 of 2019 3
6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 'Resolution Professional'
submitted that the claim amount collated was Rs 2173 as per report obtained
from one independent 'Chartered Accountant', which was sent with the E-mail
relied on by the Appellant. On validation of the same, the invoices were sent
to the 'Corporate Debtor' / 'Resolution Applicant'. As per the said Report,
the total amount as shown have been paid through RTGS or through other
mode in the account of the 'Corporate Debtor' and only a sum of Rs. 2173 was
found to be payable.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 412 of 2019 4
7. Same plea has been taken by the learned counsel for the 'Corporate
Debtor' / 'Resolution Applicant'.
8. The Resolution Professional has brought on record a Report of
independent Chartered Accountant dated 1st November, 2018, who on
verification of the ledger of the 'Operational Creditor', invoices and the records
of the 'Corporate Debtor' by letter dated 1st November, 2018 concluded that
both the invoices under consideration are paid giving the balance of Rs. 2173
payable. The copy of the letter dated 1st November, 2018, which reads as
follows:
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 412 of 2019 5
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 412 of 2019 6
9. The Bank statement has also been enclosed with the reply-affidavit filed
by the 'Resolution Professional' in support of the stand taken.
10. The only question arises for consideration is as to how Section 9
application was admitted if the amount is found to be Rs. 2173 which is much
less than Rupees One Lakh.
11. In this regard we may only mention that at the stage of admission of
application under Section 9, the Adjudicating Authority is required to notice
whether the record is complete and there is a 'debt' and 'default' as per
decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 'Innoventive Industries Ltd. v.
ICICI Bank', (2018) 1 SCC 407]. Even if the claim amount is disputed and
is more than Rupees One Lakh, it is to be admitted, the Adjudicating
Authority is not required to go into the details of verification of the claim which
is required to be made by the 'Resolution Professional' and, therefore, even if
some record shows that claim amount is Rupees One Lakh, it is always open
to the 'Resolution Professional' to collate the claim.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 412 of 2019 7
12. In view of the facts as narrated above, we are not inclined to interfere
with the impugned order dated 14th March, 2019. The appeal is accordingly
dismissed. No costs.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice A.I.S. Cheema ] Member (Judicial)
[ Kanthi Narahari ] Member (Technical) /ns/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 412 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free