Adventz Finance Private Limited vs Jai Annanya Investments Private ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A written acknowledgement of a debt issued by the corporate debtor, where it is on the record of the Section 7 application, constitutes sufficient evidence of the existence of the debt and of the financial debt for the purposes of admitting an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; an adjudicating authority that overlooks such material in rejecting the application commits an error. A financial creditor's application under Section 7 is not defeated by the absence of the creditor's name, or the names of the debtor, from the notes of the creditor's own auditor's report where the financial statements disclose the total inter-corporate deposits advanced and the auditor's references relate to other debtors in litigation; reliance on such omissions to find that the debt is unproved is unsustainable. Where the application states the amount claimed to be in default and the dates on which the default occurred, in the prescribed form and with a supporting tabular annexure, the requirement of stating the date of default is satisfied, and a finding that no date of default is mentioned cannot be sustained.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
[Arising out of Order dated 12.01.2022 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Kolkata Bench, Kolkata in C.P. (IB) No. 2119/KB/2019]
IN THE MATTER OF:
Adventz Finance Private Limited Registered office at: Hongkong House, 31, B.B.D. Bagh (S), Kolkata - 700001 ...Appellant
Versus
Jai Annanya Investments Private Limited Registered office at: 8, Camac Street, Shantiniketan Building, 7th Floor, Room No. 11 & 12, Kolkata - 700017. ...Respondent
Present:
For Appellant: Ms. Neha Somani, PCS.
For Respondent:
JUDGMENT
ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.
This appeal by the Financial Creditor has been filed against the order
dated 12.01.2022 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company
Law Tribunal), Kolkata Bench, Kolkata rejecting Section 7 application filed
Cont'd.../ -2-
by the Appellant. Brief facts of the case necessary for deciding this appeal
are:-
(i) The Corporate Debtor vide letter dated 14.05.2014 sent a request
for grant of Inter Corporate Deposit to 'Adventz Investments and
Holdings Ltd.'. Request was for Inter Corporate Deposit of Rs.40
Crore with interest @12.5% payable half yearly.
(ii) Adventz Investments and Holdings Ltd.' (which subsequently got
merged with the Appellant pursuant to a scheme of amalgamation
sanctioned by Hon'ble Calcutta High Court on 02.06.2014)
accepted to grant Inter Corporate Deposit to the Corporate Debtor
of Rs.40 Crore and a cheque of Rs.25 Crore was annexed
alongwith letter dated 16.05.2014.
(iii) The Corporate Debtor from time to time has repaid some amounts
on account of principal and also on account of interest. Corporate
Debtor had also made deductions on account of Tax Deducted at
Source and Form 26 AS was also filed in this regard.
(iv) Due to defaults committed by the Corporate Debtor in servicing
its Interest and its repayment obligation, a legal notice dated
04.01.2016 was issued regarding repayment of inter-corporate
deposit, which notice was replied by the Corporate Debtor on
03.02.2016 where the Corporate Debtor stated that entire amount
of Inter Corporate Deposit has been invested in various securities
and due to adverse directions issued by the Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) business of the company has
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -3-
come to a standstill. It was further stated that company has been
making best possible efforts to manage funds to repay. The
Corporate Debtor even thereafter in writing has acknowledged and
admitted its liability towards the Appellant.
(v) In view of the defaults committed by the Corporate Debtor, an
application was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred as 'I&B Code') in
March, 2019.
(vi) The Corporate Debtor appeared before the Adjudicating Authority
on 16.12.2019 and sought direction to file vakalatnama and reply.
(vii) The Adjudicating Authority proceeded ex-parte against the
Corporate Debtor by order dated 22.09.2021.
(viii) Subsequently, by order dated 12.01.2022, the application under
Section 7 has been rejected.
2. In this appeal notices were issued to the Corporate Debtor on
04.05.2022. Although notices were served but no one appeared nor any
reply was filed.
3. We have heard Ms. Neha Somani, Authorized Representative of the
Appellant on 28.09.2022. None had appeared for the Respondent. Learned
Authorized Representative of the Appellant challenging the order passed by
the Adjudicating Authority submits that the Adjudicating Authority erred
in not taking into consideration the acknowledgements in writing issued by
the Corporate Debtor where debt was acknowledged. It is submitted that
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -4-
the Adjudicating Authority also erred in observing that in the Independent
Auditor's Report of the Financial Creditor for Financial Years 2014-15,
2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19 names of the companies to whom
Financial Creditor has advanced Inter Corporate Deposit are distinctly
mentioned whereas there is no mention with regard to the Corporate
Debtor. It is submitted that the mention of names of those few companies
was made against whom litigations were going on and the total of Inter
Corporate Deposit given by the Financial Creditor were mentioned.
Further, all details of the dues in a tabular chart has been mentioned. It
is submitted that the Adjudicating Authority erred in rejecting Section 7
application whereas debt and default both were successfully proved.
3. We have considered the submissions of learned Authorized
Representative for the Appellant and perused the record.
4. It is relevant to notice that alongwith Section 7 application, the
Financial Creditor in Part IV has given the details of amounts which were
granted as Inter Corporate Deposit to the Corporate Debtor. The request
letter dated 14.05.2014 which was received from the Corporate Debtor has
been mentioned and the same was filed as Annexure A-IV. It is useful to
extract the letter dated 14.05.2014.
"Dated: 14th May, 2014
Adventz Investments And Holdings Ltd. 31, Hongkong House, B.B.D. Bagh (South), Kolkata - 700001
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -5-
Sub: Request for grant of Inter-Corporate Deposit (ICD).
Sir,
With reference to above you are requested to kindly grant us an Inter-Corporate Deposit (ICD) of Rs.40 Crore on the following terms and conditions:
1. ICD Amount : Rs. 40 Crore (Rupees Forty Crore only)
2. Rate of Interest : 12.50% p.a. (payable half yearly)
3. Repayment : 1 year with an option to renew further
4. Disbursement : Immediate in single or tranches
5. PAN No. : AABCGO769Q
We shall appreciate for your immediate response.
Thanking you
Yours faithfully For Jai Annanya Investments Pvt. Ltd."
5. The request made by the Corporate Debtor was accepted vide letter
dated 16.05.2014 which was also referred to and filed as part of Annexure
IV, which is as follows:-
"Dated: 16th May, 2014
Jai Annanya Investments Pvt. Ltd.
31, Hongkong House, B.B.D. Bagh (South), Kolkata - 700001
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -6-
Sub: Inter-Corporate Deposit.
Dear Sir,
This has reference to you request letter dated 14/05/2014, requesting for providing for Inter- Corporate Deposit for a sum of Rs. 40 Crore on the terms mentioned therein.
We are pleased to inform you that we have sanctioned ICD on the following terms as mentioned below:
1. ICD Amount : Rs. 40 Crore (Rupees Forty Crore only)
2. Rate of Interest : 12.50% p.a. (payable half yearly)
3. Repayment : 1 year with an option to renew further
4. Disbursement : In tranches
We enclose herewith out Cheque No. 000309 dated 16/05/2014 drawn on The Ratnakar Bank Ltd for Rs. 25 Crore (Rupees Twenty Five Crore only) towards the said ICD.
Our PAN is AACCP3995N.
You are requested to acknowledge the receipt of the same.
Thanking you
Yours faithfully For Adventz Investments & Holdings Ltd."
6. The Financial Creditor has also brought on record the Bank
Statement to prove that in pursuance of the communication dated
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -7-
16.05.2014 an amount of Rs.25 Crore was deposited in the account of the
Corporate Debtor. The Inter Corporate Deposit with the terms and
conditions as contained in the both the above letters clearly prove that
financial facility by Inter Corporate Deposit was extended by the Financial
Creditor. In the Part IV of the application there is a specific reference of
legal notice dated 04.01.2016 issued on behalf of the Financial Creditor to
the Corporate Debtor where it was mentioned that a sum of
Rs.4,03,17,465/- is due towards interest. The Corporate Debtor was called
upon to pay the interest on the said corporate deposit since 01.10.2014.
The legal notice was replied by the Corporate Debtor by letter dated
03.02.2016 which is also part of Section 7 application. In the reply dated
03.02.2016 following has been stated by the Corporate Debtor:-
"February 3, 2016
By Hand Delivery
To, The Director Adventz Finance Private Limited 31, B.B.D. Bagh (S), Hong Kong House, Kolkata - 700001
Dear Sir,
Sub: Your Legal Notice dated January 4, 2016
We refer to your subject legal notice whereby you have called upon us to pay an amount of Rs. 29,03,17,465/- being the balance amount of inter- corporate deposit sanctioned by you vide your
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -8-
letter dated May 16, 2016 together with interest thereon calculated at the rate of 12.50 % p.a. within 7 days from the date of receipt of the notice.
In reply thereto, we inform you that the entire amount of inter-corporate deposit has been invested in various securities. Vide order dated August 20, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has restrained the Company from buying, selling or dealing in the securities markets, either directly or indirectly, in any manner, till further directions.
Due to the adverse directions issued by SEBI vide its order dated August 20, 2015, the complete business of the Company has come to a standstill resulting in a loss of INR 93.12 Lacs to the Company.
Further, the demat accounts of the Company has been frozen thereby preventing us from liquidating the investments and paying off our creditors.
We further inform you that in order to liquidate the Company's investments and pay off its creditors, applications have been made by the Company to SEBI including dated February 2, 2016 seeking certain interim reliefs. Please find enclosed a copy of the interim application dated February 2, 2016 for your reference.
The Company has been making best possible efforts to arrange for funds to repay its creditors. However, due to unforeseen circumstances
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -9-
beyond its control, the Company is unable to discharge its commitments within time.
In the interest of maintaining business relations, we request you to kindly hold back initiation of legal recourse against the Company until the disposal of the above interim application by SEBI.
We sincerely regret the inconvenience caused to you by the delay in repayment of the balance amount of inter-corporate deposit.
Thanking you
Yours faithfully,
For Jai Ananya Investments Private Limited
Director"
7. When we look into the above letters issued by the Corporate Debtor
there is a clear acknowledgement of debt. The Adjudicating Authority had
not adverted to aforesaid materials before coming to the conclusion that
there is no acknowledgement of the Inter Corporate Deposit in the
Independent Auditor's Report of the Financial Creditor for Financial Years
2014-15 to 2018-19.
8. Now coming to the Independent Auditor's Report of the Financial
Creditor which has relied by the Adjudicating Authority in Para 9, it is
relevant to notice that there is mention of name of certain companies in the
Independent Auditor's Report. For example: at page 160, Para 2.28 (FY-
2014-15), following has been stated:-
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -10-
"2.28 The company has given Inter-Corporate Deposits of Rs. 2 crores to M/s . Chopra Marketing Private Limited, Rs.7 crores to Enso Private Limited and Rs.2.30 crores to Birla Power Solutions Limited. Since the amounts were not refunded by the said parties on time, the Company has filed legal cases at Division/High Court at Calcutta/ Bombay for recovery of the said amount. Necessary provisions have been made in the accounts."
9. Similarly, there is mention of certain other companies at page 181
(para 2.21, FY 2015-16), page 211 (para 2.19, FY 2016-17), page 238 (para
2.19, FY 2017-18), page 276 (para 2.30, FY 2018-19) of the paper book.
When we look into all the above paras, mention of Inter Corporate Deposit
given to certain entities has been clearly mentioned but what is relevant is
that all those refer to litigations with regard to Inter Corporate Deposit. It
is further relevant to notice that in the Financial Statements details of Inter
Corporate Deposit where total Short Term Loans and Advance have been
given. For example in the Balance Sheet as on 31.03.2015, Short Term
Loans and Advance as on 31.03.2015 are mentioned as 1,46,31,84,491/-
which referred to Note No. 2.14, which is to the following effect:-
"NOTE No. - 2.14 SHORT TERM LOANS AND ADVANCES Unsecured. Considered good Inter-Corporate Deposit 1,43,37,53,247
Advances (recoverable in cash or kind or value to be received
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -11-
Advance Income Tax 54,01,771 (net of provision) Advances to Employees 14,83,873 Prepaid Expenses 3,16,286 Others 2,22,29,314 Unsecured. Considered Doubtful Inter-Corporate Deposit 18,56,87,409 Less: Provision for 18,56,87,409 Doubtful Loans 1,46,31,84,491
10. The above financial statement clearly mentions the Inter Corporate
Deposit of Rs.1,43,37,53,247/-. Similarly, with regard to other financial
years mention of total Inter Corporate Deposit is given. The Adjudicating
Authority has drawn adverse inference against the Financial Creditor only
relying on few names of companies to whom Inter Corporate Deposit was
given and whose names were mentioned in the note in the Independent
Auditor's Report, but as noted above the names in the Report were with
regard to those companies with whom litigations were going on. As noted
above, the details of total Inter Corporate Deposits, which runs to Rs.143
Crores, has been reflected in the financial statements and the Adjudicating
Authority without adverting to the relevant material jumped to conclusion
that financial creditor has failed to prove Inter Corporate Deposit given to
the Corporate Debtor, which finding is unsustainable.
11. Now, we come to the observation of the Adjudicating Authority that
there is no date of default mentioned in the application. In the Part IV Item
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -12-
No.2 under the column "Amount claimed to be in default and the date on
which the default occurred", following has been stated:-
2. AMOUNT AMOUNT CLAIMED TO BE IN CLAIMED DEFAULT TO BE IN Rs. 4,05,51,038/- (Rupees Four DEFAULT Crores Five Lakh Fifty One AND THE Thousand and Thirty Eight only) DATE ON Rs.1,18,50,000/- on account of WHICH principal, ii) Rs.2,87,01,038/- on THE account of interest.
DEFAULT OCCURRED DATES ON WHICH THE DEFAULT OCCURRED
On 31-03-2015, interest to be received was Rs.3,27,48,287/- out of which only Rs.1,31,14,726/- was received and balance Rs.1,96,33,561/- was in default.
On 31-03-2016, total outstanding interest was Rs.35,10,16,758/- out of which only Rs.54,00,000/- was received and balance Rs.4,56,16,758/- was in default.
On 31-03-2017, total outstanding interest was Rs.6,62,57,905/- out of which only Rs.2,75,56,867/- was received and balance Rs.3,87,01,038/- was in default.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -13-
On 31-03-2018, total outstanding interest was Rs.3,87,01,038/- out of which only Rs.1,00,00,000/- was received and balance Rs.2,87,01,038/- was in default.
The details of amount of default in tabular format attached hereto and marked as "Annexure A-XVI".
12. Further details of amount of default in tabular format are annexed
as Annexure-XVI. Thus, observation of the Adjudicating Authority that
date of default has not been mentioned also cannot be accepted.
13. It is also relevant to notice that Corporate Debtor has also made
payments in the years 2015, 2016, 2017 till the financial year 2018-19
which details are all mentioned in the Part IV of the application. It is further
relevant to notice that Corporate Debtor although once appeared before the
Adjudicating Authority but neither filed any reply nor appeared thereafter
and Adjudicating Authority proceeded ex-parte against the Corporate
Debtor. In this appeal also despite service of notice, Corporate Debtor did
not appear. There is not even dispute to allegations and case set up by the
Financial Creditor against the Corporate Debtor.
14. We, thus, are of the view that Adjudicating Authority committed error
in rejecting Section 7 application. The order passed by the Adjudicating
Authority dated 12.01.2022 cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside.
Section 7 application being CP (IB) No. 2119/KB/2019 is revived before the
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022 -14-
Adjudicating Authority and Adjudicating Authority is directed to pass an
order of admission alongwith all consequential directions within period of
one month from the date the copy of this order is produced before the
Adjudicating Authority. The Appeal is allowed accordingly.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
NEW DELHI
12th October, 2022
Archana
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 475 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free