Acrow Realcon Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs Union Bank Of India & Anr
- CitationComp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 271
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where the adjudicating authority has itself called for a report from the Registrar of Companies on the existence of companies at their registered addresses, it ought to await that report before proceeding on the question, and it is not necessary for it to call upon the directors to file an explanation or to appear physically on the next date for that purpose. A direction requiring the directors of respondent companies to appear physically before the adjudicating authority is not warranted at a stage where the question of the companies' existence at their registered addresses is pending before the Registrar of Companies, and a direction of that kind is set aside. The imposition of costs upon respondents for failing to file a reply within a short period is not justified where the reply was sought in a context that did not warrant it, and such costs are set aside.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Acrow Realcon Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Appellant(s)
Versus
Union Bank of India & Anr. ...Respondent(s) Present: For Appellant : Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prateek Gupta, Mr. Raghav Tiwari, Advocates. For Respondents : Mr. Abhishek Anand, Ms. Shankari Mishra, Mr. Arun Kumar Shukla, Mr. Naman Shukla, Ms. Palak Kalra, Advocates.
ORDER
(Hybrid Mode) 05.05.2025: Heard Counsel for the Appellant and Ld. Counsel
appearing for Union Bank of India on whose application, IA No. 1214 of
2023, impugned order dated 18.12.2024 as well as subsequent order dated
21.01.2025 have been passed.
2. On application of Union Bank of India notices were issued and
service reports were submitted on 09.09.2024 that these companies are no
longer existing at the given addresses. Adjudicating Authority vide order
dated 18.12.2024 directed that an explanation be filed by the Respondents
personally as to how these addresses are being used when these companies
are not in existence at that address. Further Respondents to file the
Response and further directed to be physically present on the next date.
Further, in paragraph 8 a direction was issued to the respective RoC to investigate and verify the existence of these Respondent companies at the
registered address given in the letterhead and submit the report.
3. By subsequent order dated 21.01.2025 Adjudicating Authority
noticed that no response have been filed, it further granted one-week time
subject to Costs of Rs. 25,000/-upon each of the Respondents to file a
response.
4. The Appellant aggrieved by the above order has filed this appeal.
5. Shri Krishnendu Datta, Ld. Sr. Counsel submits that when the
Adjudicating Authority has already directed the RoC to carry on the
investigation and submit a report there was no requirement to carry on the
same exercise by the adjudicating authority in the proceedings before the
adjudicating authority which was IA No. 1214(AHM)2023.
6. It is further submitted that there was no necessity for issuance of
direction for physically present since the director shall cooperate with the
RoC and in the investigation by the RoC.
7. It is submitted that subsequent to order dated 21.01.2025
adjudicating authority noticed that no response have been filed cost of Rs.
25000/- was imposed on each Respondent which was un called for. It is the
RoC the authority under the Companies Act, 2013 who has to make
investigation and take decision with regard to registered office of a
Company.
8. Shri Abhishek Anand, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent submits that
the Adjudicating Authority has already directed RoC to exercise and
investigate submit the report which directions are contained in paragraph 8 of the order, in event the said directions are maintained the Respondent
have no objection that no proceeding at this stage be initiated or gone into
regarding the existence of the companies at the registered office mentioned
by the adjudicating authority.
9. Shri Abhishek Anand, Ld. Counsel however submits that the report
of the RoC may be awaited and the directors may be directed to co-operate
with the said investigation.
10. We have considered the submissions of the Counsel for the parties
and perused the record.
11. The issue which has been flagged by the adjudicating authority vide
order dated 18.12.2024 is non-existence of the companies at the given
address where notices were issued by the bank. Adjudicating authority in
paragraph 8 of the order issued the following direction:
"8. Meanwhile, we also direct the respective RoC to investigate and verify the existence of these Respondent companies at the registered address given in the letterhead of the resolution and submit the report. Details of the same are as under:
S. Registered Company Company CIN Respondent No. Address Name No 1 2 Gala No. Acrow U45201DN2007PTC000249 Respondent 107, Realcon Pvt. No.2 Everest Ltd.
Industrial Estate, Near 66 Kva Power Sub Station, Amli, Silvassa, Dadra and Nagra Haveli-
396230 3 RM-81, Royal U72900MH2009PYC194395 Respondent Sudarshan Compservices No.3 Nagar, Pvt. Ltd. MIDC, Phase -II, Dombivali East 421201. 4 Room No. Charms U45202ON200PTC000207 Respondent 8, Patel Holding Pvt. No.4 Pada, Ltd. Samarvani, Silvassa Dadra & Nagar Haveli- 396230 5 Gala No. Elnet Conpro U25191DN2006PTC000200 Respondent 105, Pvt. Ltd. No.5 Everest Industrial Estate, Near 66 KVA Power Sub Station, Amli, Silvassa, Dadra and Nagra Haveli- 396230 6 Unit No. Sumeru U70100MH2006PTC159109 Respondent 34A, Reality Pvt. No.6 2 Floor, nd Ltd. Arsiwala Bldg, Wode House Rd, Colaba, Mumbai- 400053 7 Gala No. Amex U45201DN2007PTC000252 Respondent 108, Infrastructure No.7 Everest Pvt. Ltd. Industrial Estate, Near 66 KVA Power Sub Station, Amli, Silvassa, Dadra and Nagra Haveli- 396230 8 Office No. Wellworth U17120MH2009PTC194116 Respondent M2, Apparels Pvt. No.8 Maznine Ltd. Floor, Pearl Plaza, Tata Road No. 2, Opera House. Mumbai- 400004 9 25, Floor- Anukaran U74140MH2009PTC194927 Respondent 2, Consultancy No.9 Plot-59/61, Pvt. Ltd. Arsiwala Mansion, Nathalal Parikh Marg, Colaba, Mumbai- 400005 10 Flat No. Eremurus U51900DN2010PTC000317 Respondent 304, Trading No.10
Cosmicity Company Pvt.
Jupiter Ltd. H.No. 1615/20, Build Type- C, Sayli, Silvassa- 396230
11 Office No. - Cyra Capitals U67120MH2008PTC184636 Respondent 122, Pvt. Ltd. No.11 1st Floor, Paras Centre A, Tata Road No.-2, Opera House Mumbai Mumbai-
400004 12 Gala No. Single Point U72900DN200OPTC000156 Respondent 108, Security No.12 Everest Solutions Industrial Estate, Near 66 KVA Power Sub Station, Amli, Silvassa, Dadra and Nagra Haveli- 396230 13 Gala No. Shri Gopala U45402DN2006PTC000208 Respondent 108, Holding Pvt. No.13 Everest Ltd. Industrial Estate, Near 66 KVA Power Sub Station, Amli, Silvassa, Dadra and Nagra Haveli- 396230 14 RM-81, Unique U74990MH2009PTC196366 Respondent Sudarshan Warehouse No.14 Nagar, Pvt. Ltd. MIDC, Phase-11, Dombivli (East)- 421201 15 Gala No. Carnat U45201DN2007PTC000254 Respondent 107, Estates Pvt. No.15 Everest Ltd. Industrial Estate, Near 66 KVA Power Sub Station, Amli, Silvassa, Dadra and Nagra Haveli- 396230 16 RM-81, Picturesque U51109MH2010PTC200063 Respondent Sudarshan Trading Pvt. No.16 Nagar, Ltd. MIDC, Phase-11, Dombivli (East)- 421201 17 Office No. Tanvish U51109MH2009PTC196078 Respondent 122, 1st Trading Pvt. No.17 Floor, Ltd. Paras Centre A, Tata Road No. 2, Opera House, Mumbai- 400004 18 Office No. Concart Con U45201DN2006PTC000218 Respondent 108, Pro Pvt. Ltd. No.18 Everest Industrial Estate, Near 66 KVA Power Sub Station, Amli, Silvassa, Dadra and Nagra Haveli- 396230 19 Office No. Axtel U45201DN20079TC000255 Respondent 108, Properties No.19 Everest Pvt. Ltd. Industrial Estate, Near 66 KVA Power Sub Station, Amli, Silvassa, Dadra and Nagra Haveli- 396230 20 Office No. Madhu U17100MH1986PTC041758 Respondent 122, 1st Crimpers Pvt. No.20 Floor, Ltd. Paras Centre A, Tata Road No. 2, Opera House, Mumbai- 400004 21 Plot No. Shri Ganesh U18101MH1992PTC065303 Respondent 6/4 & 6/5, Hosiery Mills No.21 TTC MIDC Pvt. Ltd. Pawane Village, Navi Mumbai, Thane- 400705 22 Office No. Taban Real U70109MH201OPTC209037 Respondent 127, 1st Estate Pvt. No.22 Floor A- Ltd. Paras Centre A, Tata Road No. 2, Opera House, Mumbai- 400004 23 Rrn-81, Vighnaharta U74990MH2009PTC196826 Respondent Sudarshan Corrugators No.23 Nagar, Pvt. Ltd. MIDC, Phase-11, Dombivli (East), Thane- 421201 24 Rrn-81, Shri Govind U74990MH2009PTC196431 Respondent Sudarshan Cement Pvt. No.24 Nagar, Ltd. MIDC, Phase-11, Dombivli (East), Thane- 421201 25 Gala No. Richi-Rich U45201DN2006PLC000188 Respondent 107, Realty Ltd. No.25 Everest Industrial Estate, Near 66 KVA Power Sub Station, Amli- Silvassa- U.T. of Dadra and Nagra Haveli- 396230 26 27A, Kausar U17120MH2009PTC196397 Respondent Mezzanine Textiles Pvt. No.26 Floor, Ltd. Swadeshi Mill Building, Plot No. 80/84, J.5.5 Road Opera House, Girgaon, Mumbai- 400004
12. When the adjudicating authority had called for the report from the
RoC to investigate and verify the existence of the companies at the address
mentioned authority ought to have awaited the report for proceeding further
in the matter and it was not necessary for the adjudicating authority to ask
the director to submit a explanation or be physically present before the
adjudicating authority on the next date.
13. We thus are of the view that directions of the adjudicating authority
for directing the director to physically present is not called for at this stage
and in the facts of the present case no order was required for imposing cost
of Rs. 25000/- each upon the Respondents for submitting the reply within a
week.
14. We are further of the view that directions contained in paragraph 3
of the order dated 18.12.2024 need to be set aside while maintaining the
directions issued in paragraph 8 of the order and the cost imposed by order
dated 21.01.2025 is also set aside. The Adjudicating authority may await
the report of the RoC with regard to existence of the companies, however
may proceeded in accordance with law with regard to any other issue before
it.
15. After a report is received as directed in paragraph 8 of the order by
the adjudicating authority, it shall be open for the parties to take such steps
as permissible in law.
16. It shall be open for the adjudicating authority to proceed to decide
IA No. 1214 of 2023 either by awaiting the report or without awaiting the
report.
17. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion with
regard to existence of companies.
18. The appeal is partly allowed as indicated above.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
[Arun Baroka] Member (Technical) sr/nn
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free