Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Acira Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. vs Sebi

Securities Appellate Tribunal23 December 2020Tarun Agarwala

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The delay in filing the appeal is condoned on account of the pandemic, and the impugned order is quashed because the matter is squarely covered by the Tribunal's earlier decision in Bharat J. Patel & Ors. vs. SEBI, which the Tribunal applies without stating the principle that case decided.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNALMUMBAI

Date of Decision:23.12.2020

Misc. Application No.558 of 2020 And Appeal No.536 of 2020

Acira Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. 511/C, 6th Floor, Sunshine CHSL, Off. Chandivali Farm, Raheja Vihar, Andheri (East), Mumbai - 400 072. ...Appellant

Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India Plot No.C-4A, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai - 400 051. ...Respondent

Mr. Raeed Kazi, Advocate with Mr. Hasnain Kazi, Advocate for the Appellant.

Mr. Anubhav Ghosh, Advocate with Mr. Ravishekhar Pandey, Advocate i/b. The Law Point for the Respondent.

CORAM: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Dr. C. K. G. Nair, Member Justice M.T. Joshi, Judicial Member

Per: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral) 2

1.

The impugned order is dated 4th March, 2020. There

is a delay in filing the appeal. On account of the

pandemic we condone the delay. The misc. application

is allowed.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties we

are of the opinion that the matter is squarely covered

by a decision of this Tribunal dated 8th September,

2020 passed in Appeal no.154 of 2020 Bharat J. Patel

& Ors. vs. SEBI. In view of the aforesaid, the

impugned order is quashed and the appeal is allowed at

the admission stage without calling for a reply. In the

circumstances of the case, parties shall bear their own

costs.

3. The present matter was heard through video

conference due to Covid-19 pandemic. At this stage it

is not possible to sign a copy of this order nor a

certified copy of this order could be issued by the

registry. In these circumstances, this order will be

digitally signed by the Private Secretary on behalf of 3

the bench and all concerned parties are directed to act

on the digitally signed copy of this order. Parties will

act on production of a digitally signed copy sent by fax

and/or email.

RAJALAKS Digitally signed by RAJALAKSHMI H NAIR Justice Tarun Agarwala HMI H NAIR Date: 2020.12.28 11:42:45 +05'30' Presiding Officer

Dr. C.K.G. Nair Member

Justice M.T. Joshi Judicial Member

23.12.2020 RHN

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free