Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Abstract Logixtix Pvt Ltd vs Nuddea Plantations Pvt & Ors

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal5 December 2019

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Adjudicating Authority, having been directed by an earlier order of the Appellate Tribunal to hear the application for withdrawal under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 before other pending matters, is bound to give effect to that direction and may take up the withdrawal application first. Where the Committee of Creditors has, by a 100% vote, approved withdrawal of a Section 9 proceeding under Section 12A, and the withdrawal has been acted upon and the proceeding disposed of, a third party's challenge to that withdrawal in appeal is not entertained merely because it asserts a claim in the corporate insolvency resolution process; any such claimant's remedy lies in separate proceedings available to it under law.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALNEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.840-841 of 2019IN THE MATTER OF:

Abstract Logixtix Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant

Versus

Nuddea Plantations Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents

For Appellant: Shri Madhusudhan Sarkar and Shri Sukesh Ghosh, Advocates

For Respondents: Shri Soumitra Lahiri, Advocate (R-2) Ms. Smriti Churiwal and Shri Jaivir Sidhant, Advocates (R-3 - COC) Shri Ashok Kumar Singh and Shri Pradip Kumar Mondal, Advocate (R1 and R5)

ORDER

05.12.2019 Heard Advocate - Shri Madhusudhan Sarkar. Also

heard Advocate - Shri Ashok Kumar Singh for Respondent Nos. 1 and 5

and Advocate - Shri Soumitra Lahiri for Resolution Professional as well as

Ms. Smriti Churiwal for Respondent No.3. The Appeal is against Impugned

Orders dated 26th June, 2019 and 10th July, 2019 passed by the

Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench)

which read as under:-

Order dated 26th June, 2019

"ORDER

Ld. RP appears. Ld. Counsel for the Corporate Debtor appears. Ld. Counsel for one of the creditors 2

appears. Ld. Counsel for the CoC appears. It is brought to my notice the order passed by the Hon'ble NCLAT dated 09.04.2019 whereby this authority is directed to consider the application for withdrawal and this authority is bound by the order of the Hon'ble NCLAT. In view of this, the application for withdrawal be placed for hearing first, then other matters. Matter to appear for further consideration on 26.08.2019."

Order dated 10th July, 2019

"ORDER

Ld RP alongwith the Ld. Counsel for the RP appears. Ld Counsel for the CoC appears. Ld. Counsel on behalf of the corporate debtor appears. CA(IB)835.KB/2019 is filed by the RP and original applicant for withdrawal of this proceeding under section 12A of IBC. CoC in its meeting dated 08.04.2019 by 100% votes gave approval for permitting the withdrawal. In view of this, withdrawal is allowed. In view of this, CA(IB) 835/KB/2019 stands disposed off. Operational Creditor may file proceeding independently. All other pending applications will come on 26.08.2019."

2. The learned Counsel submits that the Appellant is a Financial

Creditor who had earlier filed Form B when the insolvency proceedings were

initiated against Nuddea Plantations Pvt. Ltd. It is stated that when the

Appellant filed the claim as Operational Creditor, the Resolution

Professional had expressed opinion that the claim was in the nature of

Financial debt. The learned Counsel states that consequently the Appellant

had again filed Form 'C' on the basis of being a Financial Creditor on 3rd

April, 2019 which was within the time prescribed. The Counsel states that

before considering the claim of the Appellant as a Financial Creditor, the

Resolution Professional moved the Adjudicating Authority under Section

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.840-841 of 2019 3

12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC - in short) that the

original Applicant - Operational Creditor was withdrawing the Application

which had been filed with consent of the Committee of Creditor (COC). The

Counsel submits that the Appellant had moved the Adjudicating Authority

also but the Adjudicating Authority refused to hear the Application of the

Appellant before hearing the Application of the Resolution Professional for

withdrawal of the proceeding and thereafter, disposed of the Application by

allowing withdrawal of CIRP process. It is argued that when COC approved

the withdrawal, there was no agenda.

3. The Resolution Professional, who is present in person, states that

earlier the withdrawal Application had been received by e-mail on 20th

March, 2019 which was placed before the COC on 22nd March, 2019 and

in Item No.9, the COC had given consent with 100% voting for the

withdrawal. The RP refers to other Minute of COC, which meeting took place

on 1st April, 2019 in which specific item was there as Agenda Item No.4 and

its decision is as under:-

"Item No.4:

To approve withdrawal, under section 12A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, of application, admitted under section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, based on an application in Form FA dated 19th March, 2019 (received by Resolution Professional on 25th March, 2019) made by the applicant K N Chaudhury & Co Private Limited in accordance with regulation 30A (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, with 100% voting share of the Committee of Creditors and directing the

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.840-841 of 2019 4

Resolution Professional to submit the application under sub-regulation (1) to the Adjudicating Authority on behalf of the applicant, within three days of such approval as specified under regulation 30A(4)

In reiteration to the decision of the second Committee of Creditors meeting held on 22nd March, 2018, the financial creditor gave their in principle consent, with 100% voting share, subject to completion of formalities including reimbursement of CIRP cost, to withdraw the CIRP under Section 12A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, of application, admitted under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, based on an application in Form FA dated 19th March, 2019 (received by Resolution Professional on 25th March, 2019) made by the applicant K N Chaudhury & Co Private Limited in accordance with regulation 30A (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016. However, as some formalities pertaining to payment of CIRP expenses remain pending, the Committee of Creditors keeps on hold its final approval and the Resolution Professional is directed to convene meeting of the Committee of Creditors immediately after receiving intimation pertaining to payment of cost incurred for purposes of regulation 31(c) and (d) till the date of application."

4. The two Minutes tendered at Bar by the Resolution Professional

present are marked as 'X' and 'Y' for identification. It is stated that

subsequently, the Adjudicating Authority has acted upon the

withdrawal Application moved which was approved by COC and the

concerned Section 9 proceeding has already been disposed. Even

otherwise, the Appellant admittedly submitted Form - 'C' claiming to be

Financial Creditor on 3rd April, 2019 and before that already the COC as

was constituted, had in principal approved the withdrawal and this being

so, and as COC has not raised objection, we do not go into the niceties. We

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.840-841 of 2019 5

do not find any reason to entertain this Appeal at the instance of present

Appellant to upset the withdrawal action which has been already

completed. If the Appellant has claim as Financial Creditor or Operational

Creditor, it would be open for the Appellant to take recourse to appropriate

proceeding as per law, on its own.

The Appeal is disposed of. No costs.

[Justice A.I.S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)

[Kanthi Narahari] Member (Technical)

[V.P. Singh] Member (Technical) /rs/md

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.840-841 of 2019

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free