A. Maheshwaran vs Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund & ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 954 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a financial creditor's claim under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is a right to payment that is disputed, the claim is nonetheless a "claim" and "debt" within the Code, and an application under Section 7 remains maintainable provided the default amount is Rupees One Lakh or more. The precise quantum of the financial creditor's claim is not a ground for rejecting the Section 7 application at the admission stage; it is to be determined at the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process stage, when the Interim Resolution Professional collates and ascertains the claims.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 954 of 2019
IN THE MATTER OF:
Mr. A. Maheshwaran ...Appellant
Versus
Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund & Anr. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant : Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Mr. Apurve M. Gokhale, Mr. Gautam Bajaj and Mr. Shakir, Advocates
ORDER
16.09.2019 This appeal has been preferred by the Appellant -
Shareholder' of 'M/s. Shree Vaishnodevi Mills Pvt. Ltd.' against order dated 22nd
July, 2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law
Tribunal), Single Bench, Chennai, whereby and whereunder, an application
under Section 7 of the 'I&B Code' preferred by 'M/s. Stressed Assets Stabilization
Fund' has been admitted.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submitted that the
claim is barred by limitation.
3. From the record, we find that the aggrieved person moved before the 'Debt
Recovery Tribunal'. Admittedly, it is accepted by the Appellant that there is
mortgage of property made by the 'Corporate Debtor'. Therefore, it is clear that
for such mortgage, 12 years limitation has been prescribed under Article 62 of
Part V of First Division of the Schedule of the Limitation Act, 1963. 2
4. Learned counsel for the Appellant next submitted that there is a dispute
about the amount claimed by the Respondent (Financial Creditor). However, on
such ground the impugned order cannot be set aside.
5. In 'Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank, (2018) 1 SCC 407], the
Hon'ble Supreme Court while dealing with the matter relating to the application
under Section 7 observed and held as follows:
"27. The scheme of the Code is to ensure that when a
default takes place, in the sense that a debt
becomes due and is not paid, the insolvency
resolution process begins. Default is defined in
Section 3(12) in very wide terms as meaning non-
payment of a debt once it becomes due and
payable, which includes non-payment of even part
thereof or an instalment amount. For the meaning
of "debt", we have to go to Section 3(11), which in
turn tells us that a debt means a liability of
obligation in respect of a "claim" and for the
meaning of "claim", we have to go back to Section
3(6) which defines "claim" to mean a right to
payment even if it is disputed. The Code gets
triggered the moment default is of rupees one lakh
or more (Section 4). The corporate insolvency
resolution process may be triggered by the
corporate debtor itself or a financial creditor or
operational creditor. A distinction is made by the
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 954 of 2019 3
Code between debts owed to financial creditors
and operational creditors. A financial creditor has
been defined under Section 5(7) as a person to
whom a financial debt is owed and a financial
debt is defined in Section 5(8) to mean a debt
which is disbursed against consideration for the
time value of money. As opposed to this, an
operational creditor means a person to whom an
operational debt is owed and an operational debt
under Section 5(21) means a claim in respect of
provision of goods or services.
28. When it comes to a financial creditor triggering the
process, Section 7 becomes relevant. Under the
explanation to Section 7(1), a default is in respect
of a financial debt owed to any financial creditor
of the corporate debtor - it need not be a debt
owed to the applicant financial creditor. Under
Section 7(2), an application is to be made under
sub-section (1) in such form and manner as is
prescribed, which takes us to the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating
Authority) Rules, 2016. Under Rule 4, the
application is made by a financial creditor in Form
1 accompanied by documents and records
required therein. Form 1 is a detailed form in 5
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 954 of 2019 4
parts, which requires particulars of the applicant
in Part I, particulars of the corporate debtor in Part
II, particulars of the proposed interim resolution
professional in part III, particulars of the financial
debt in part IV and documents, records and
evidence of default in part V. Under Rule 4(3), the
applicant is to dispatch a copy of the application
filed with the adjudicating authority by registered
post or speed post to the registered office of the
corporate debtor. The speed, within which the
adjudicating authority is to ascertain the
existence of a default from the records of the
information utility or on the basis of evidence
furnished by the financial creditor, is important.
This it must do within 14 days of the receipt of the
application. It is at the stage of Section 7(5), where
the adjudicating authority is to be satisfied that a
default has occurred, that the corporate debtor is
entitled to point out that a default has not
occurred in the sense that the "debt", which may
also include a disputed claim, is not due. A debt
may not be due if it is not payable in law or in fact.
The moment the adjudicating authority is
satisfied that a default has occurred, the
application must be admitted unless it is
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 954 of 2019 5
incomplete, in which case it may give notice to the
applicant to rectify the defect within 7 days of
receipt of a notice from the adjudicating authority.
Under sub-section (7), the adjudicating authority
shall then communicate the order passed to the
financial creditor and corporate debtor within 7
days of admission or rejection of such application,
as the case may be."
6. From the aforesaid background, it is evident that even if a debt is disputed,
if the amount is more than Rupees One Lakh, the application under Section 7 is
maintainable. What is the exact amount of claim, that is only considered at the
stage of the 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process', when the 'Interim
Resolution Professional' after collating the claims, including the claim of the
Respondent, may ascertain what amount is payable to the Respondent.
In view of the aforesaid observations, while we condone the delay of 12
days in preferring the appeal, the appeal is hereby disposed of with aforesaid
observations. No costs.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice A.I.S. Cheema ] Member (Judicial)
[ Kanthi Narahari ] Member (Technical) /ns/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 954 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free