Yogesh K. Bhatia vs State Of U.P.
- SCC1995 Supp (3) SCC 741
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where police illegally detain persons in custody outside the limits prescribed by the Constitution and law, compensation may be awarded to the detainees by the Court, and the State may be directed to recover such compensation from the guilty officers after inquiry, regardless of whether the detainees were ultimately found to have committed any offence. The State, through its instrumentalities including the police, has a duty to uphold and enforce laws prohibiting illegal detention and unlawful custodial practices; mere existence of such laws is insufficient, and strict enforcement is necessary to maintain constitutional and legal culture and prevent the Government itself from becoming a law-breaker that breeds contempt for law.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
1. We have heard Sri Ranjit Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Yogeshwar Prasad, learned senior Counsel for the respondent.
2. The Crime Branch of the C.I.D. of the State of Uttar Pradesh has submitted its report. The report establishes in a substantial measure, the allegations in the writ petition of illegal detention of Ram Chander and Sher Pal. The report also recommends that the concerned officers should be prosecuted and that one Deputy Superintendent of Police be proceeded against departmentally.
3. This is yet another instance of brazen high handedness of the police and of arbitrary exercise of authority. It is quite possible - and we do not rule out such possibility - that the two persons concerned might have been privy to or guilty of criminal acts, though we are told that no prosecution for any offence is yet under contemplation, but the fact remains that during the investigation police have totally abandoned the rules of the game and have resorted to the impermissible and illegal methods of arbitrary custodial detention. If the State - whose physical might the police represent - itself sets an example of violence and lawlessness, it becomes addictive and encourages the citizen to resort to lawless methods. As it is said, "it is not admissible to do a great right by doing a little wrong". It is not permissible to obtain a proper result by irregular or improper means. It has been said:
Our Government is the potent, the omni-present teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.
4. These cautions have, it is complained, remained mere words and pious precautions so far as the day to day working of the police is concerned. It is not enough if the laws prohibiting and condemning such methods exist, it is important that these laws must strictly be enforced so that a proper legal and constitutional culture informs the working of those who wield enormous powers over the person and property of the citizenry.
5. In these cases - it is immaterial whether they are guilty of any offence or not - they were detained illegally in police custody for several days. The police is of course entitled to investigate offences against them within the limits prescribed by the Constitution of the country and the laws; but they cannot be law unto themselves and resort to these impermissible methods. In order that proper lesson goes home, we direct the Government to pay a compensation of Rs. 5000/- to each of these two persons - Ram Chander and Sher Pal - within two weeks from today. We also direct the State Government to recover these sums from the guilty officers after holding an inquiry and as to the apportionment amongst those guilty. The amount shall be tendered by a cheque to Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee which will ensure its due disbursement to the beneficiaries.
6. The State Government will also report to this Court that due prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings, as the case may be, have been launched as per the report of the Crime Branch.
7. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free