Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Wpil Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, Meerut

Supreme Court18 September 2003S. Rajendra Babu · G.P. Mathur

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where the show cause notices issued by the excise authority do not clearly specify which goods the department seeks to bring to taxation, and the orders passed by the authorities and the Tribunal fail to articulate with clarity the exact nature of the goods in dispute or the legal basis for denying the claimed exemption, the matter must be remitted to the assessing authority for fresh consideration to do complete justice, with liberty to the appellant to file a further reply to the show cause notices.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

ORDER

1. The question raised in this appeal is that the appellant who is manufacturer of submersible pumps is entitled to claim exemption from payment of duty in terms of Notification No. 8/96, dated 23-7-1996 and similar notifications issued from time to time.

2. Three show cause notices were issued to the appellant. In the show cause notices issued it is not very clear as to what exactly are the goods which the department wants to bring for taxation as in Notice to show cause No. 47/G. Gb-1/97, dated 24-7-1997 the department has stated as follows :

".......Apart from above items party is also manufacturing Copper Bronze Casting under Chapter sub-heading No. 7419.91 and clearing it for home consumption on payment of duty and also clearing without payment of duty within the factory for manufacture of Submersible Pumps and Parts thereof....."

and in the same Notification at other places the department has stated as follows :

"..... Thus the Copper Bronze Casting being a intermediate product failing under Chapter sub-heading No. 7419.91 appears dutiable since the general exemption under Notification No. 8/96, dated 23-7-1996 (now 4/97, dated 1-3-1997) as claimed by party does not cover the items of Chapter No. 74...."

"As such the party have issued 15,450.500 kgs. of Copper Bronze Casting without payment of duty for manufacture of parts of pump during the period February 1997 to May 1997 as detailed below, on which the duty @ 15% Adv. Amounting to Rs. 5,79,394.00 have not been paid by the party..,"

3. It is not very clear either from the notices or from the reply filed by the appellant as to what exactly the position is though the contention put forth before us is that in respect of some parts which are captivity used within the factory on which no duty is paid while it is used at another unit of the factory elsewhere duty is already paid. Neither the orders made by the authorities are clear nor such a case is put forth before the Tribunal and, therefore, to do complete justice in the matter we set aside the orders passed by the authorities and the Tribunal and remit the matter to the assessing authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law. However, it is open to the appellant to file further reply to the show cause notices issued. The appeals are allowed accordingly.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free