Vinod Kumar Kapoor vs Vijay Khanna & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) No. 140 of 2017
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The appellate tribunal, on being satisfied that the contemnor had complied with the original order and paid the imposed costs, and had tendered an unconditional and unqualified apology, will set aside the portions of a contempt punishment that direct attachment and sale of property and simple imprisonment of the contemnor, and disposes of the appeal accordingly.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Vinod Kumar Kapoor ... Appellant
Versus
Vijay Khanna & Ors. ... Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. R.S. Bhatia, PCS.
For Respondents: Mr. V. Hari Pillai, Advocate.
ORDER
21.09.2017 - This appeal has been filed by Appellant / Contemnor -
Mr. Vinod Kumar Kapoor against the order dated 13th April, 2017
passed by National Company Law Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as
"Tribunal") New Delhi in Contempt Petition No. 3(ND)20 17 arising out
of Company Petition No. 69/2003, wherein for non-compliance of the
order passed by the Tribunal the following punishment has imposed
on the appellant: -
"9. I therefore deem it just, fit and expedient in the
facts of this case to direct the following:
a. Impose a costs of Rs. 5 lacs on the
Contemnor no.2, the Managing Director of the
Respondent Company, who was solely liable to
take the required steps in furtherance of the
order dated 10. 06.2013 and further -2-
Undertaking given by him on 14.08.2014.
Failure to pay this amount from his personal
account shall necessitate attachment and sale
of the Company's property to be duly
appropriated from his shareholding and/or
attachment and sale of his personal assets.
Costs is to be paid to the equitably to the
petitioners.
b. Direct simple imprisonment of Shri. Vinod
Kumar Kapoor, Contemnor no.2 for a period of
one month for the wilful breach of the
undertaking dated 14.08.2014 given to the
Court.
10. The warrants of arrest be issued by the
Registrar NCLT to be executed by the lad. CMM,
Central District through the District Judge-I, Tis Hazari,
Delhi."
2. Notice was issued on respondents and they have appeared. The
appellant in his affidavit while asked for unconditional and unqualified
apology, has taken plea that the order passed by the Tribunal in
Company Petition No. 69 of 2003 have been complied in its letter and
spirit. It is also informed that as per the impugned order cost of Rs.
5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) as imposed on the Managing
Director of the Company has also been paid.
-3-
3. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents accepts
that the order passed by Tribunal in Company Petition has been
complied by the appellant and the cost as imposed by Tribunal has been
paid. It is informed that the TDS certificate will be handed over to the
appellant by 15th October, 2017.
4. Mr. Vinod Kumar Kapoor, who is the Managing Director
(Contemnor No.2) is present in person. He personally tendered
'unconditional and unqualified apology' and submits that he had no
intention to violate the orders and directions passed by the Tribunal.
5. In view of the stand taken by the parties and taking into
consideration the fact that the appellant (Contemnor No. 2) has complied
with the original order passed by the Tribunal and has also paid the cost
of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) as imposed by impugned
order and that he is personally appeared and sought for unconditional
and unqualified apology after compliance of the Tribunal's order, we set
aside the part of the impugned order as passed in the last portion of
clause (a) and total order as contained in clause (b) of paragraph no. 9
as also the order as contained in paragraph no.10 of the impugned
order, which reads as follows: -
"9 (a) Failure to pay this amount from
his personal account shall necessitate
attachment and sale of the Company's
property to be duly appropriated from his
shareholding and/or attachment and sale of 4 -4-
his personal assets. Costs is to be paid to the
equitably to the petitioners.
b. Direct simple imprisonment of Shri. Vinod
Kumar Kapoor, Contemnor no.2 for a period of
one month for the wilful breach of the
undertaking dated 14.08.2014 given to the
Court.
10. The warrants of arrest be issued by the
Registrar NCLT to be executed by the lad. CMM,
Central District through the District Judge-I, Tis Hazari,
Delhi."
6. The impugned order passed by the Tribunal stands modified to
the extent above. The appeal stands disposed of with aforesaid
observations. No cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice A.I.S. Cheema) (Balvinder Singh) Member (Judicial) Member(Technical)
ar
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free