Vasi @ Vasio Prabhatbhai Rabari & Ors vs State Of Gujarat
- SCC(2010) 15 SCC 247
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
When the incident is more than two decades old, the parties have been peacefully cohabiting for a long time after conviction, and the accused convicted under Sections 143, 147 & 337 IPC have already undergone the greater part of their sentence, the ends of justice warrant reduction of the sentence to the period already undergone, rather than execution of the remaining term. This is particularly so where the convictions relate to a dispute among persons with proximate relationships and the injuries caused were not grievous in nature.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
VASI @ VASIO PRABHATBHAI RABARI AND ORS. Appellant(s)
:VERSUS:
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s)
O R D E R
Leave granted.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
Appellants have been convicted under Sections 143,
147 & 337 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to
undergo simple imprisonment for one month. Appellant
Nos.1, 3 & 4 have also been convicted and sentenced under
Sections 452, 324 & 427 of the Indian Penal Code for a
period of six months simple imprisonment.
The incident is more than two decades old. It is
submitted that the parties have been peacefully living
together for a long time and the accused persons who have
been convicted under Sections 143, 147 & 337 of the
I.P.C. and sentenced for one month's imprisonment have
already undergone imprisonment for 27 days. -2-
On a consideration of the totality of the facts
and circumstances of this case, particularly the nature
of injuries and the proximate relationship amongst the
parties, we are of the opinion that ends of justice would
be met if, while maintaining the conviction of the
accused under Sections 143, 147 & 337 of the I.P.C.,
their sentence is reduced to the period already undergone
by them. We direct accordingly.
Appellant Nos.1, 3 and 4 who have been convicted
under Sections 452, 324 and 427 of the I.P.C., their
sentence is reduced from six months to two months.
The impugned order passed by the High Court is
modified to the aforesaid extent and the appeal is
disposed of accordingly.
.....................J (DALVEER BHANDARI)
.....................J (K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN)
New Delhi;
April 12, 2010.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free