Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. vs Dr. A.K. Garg And Ors.
- SCC(2002) 10 SCC 392
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Under sections 269UF and 269UG of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Central Government must tender the amount equal to the apparent consideration to the party concerned within the stipulated period prescribed by law; mere authorization to a Chief Commissioner to tender such amount, without material evidence that the actual tender or offer was made to the parties within the prescribed time, does not constitute compliance with the statutory requirement, and failure to tender within the stipulated period results in abrogation of the purchase order under section 269UH.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
1. In this matter which arises out of proceedings initiated under section XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), seeking to acquire certain properties on the ground that the consideration disclosed in the sale documents fell short of the real market value of the property.
2. When that action was challenged before the High Court in writ proceedings it was found by the High Court that the sum of Rs. 23,13,994 tendered by the Central Government on September 6, 1993, was beyond the stipulated period under section 269UG, thus attracting the wrath of section 269UH of the Act resulting in abrogation of the purchase order. The said amount had to be tendered or if there is any dispute in this regard, the same should have been deposited with the appropriate authority on or before June 30, 1993. The case put forth by the Department is that the amount had been deposited with the appropriate authority but there is no material to show that the same was tendered or offered to the parties concerned. Learned counsel for the appellant adverted to the letter dated June 8/9,1993, sent by the office of the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax-II, C. R. Building New Delhi (F. No. CCIT.II/AA/R-2470/1993-94/604). The portion relied upon in that letter in regard to the amount to be tendered or deposited in terms of Section 269UG of the Act is as follows :
"The Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi, has been authorised by the Central Government to tender the amount equal to the amount of apparent consideration under Sections 269UF and 269UG of the Act."
3. All that is sought to be done by this letter is that the Chief Commissioner is authorised by the Central Government to tender the amount to the party. There is no material forthcoming to show that such offer was made before June 30, 1993. Therefore, in the circumstances, we find full justification with the view taken by the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid to the respondent which is quantified at Rs. 25,000.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free