Unify Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
- CitationRBI Compounding Order CA No. HYD 422
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The compounding authority holds that, where an applicant admits contraventions of the reporting and filing requirements in paragraphs 9(1)(A), 9(1)(B) and 9(2) of Schedule 1 to Notification No. FEMA 20/2000-RB, the authority may compound those contraventions under sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, on payment of a sum fixed in its discretion, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, rather than imposing the penalty of up to thrice the sum involved under Section 13. The compounding authority further holds that an applicant's admission of the contraventions, together with its declarations that the application's particulars are true, that it is not under any enquiry, investigation or adjudication, and that it has filed no appeal under Section 17 or Section 19, are preconditions to compounding, and that the order is subject to the veracity of those declarations and without prejudice to other action if they are found to be false or incorrect.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
In the matter of M/s Unify Technologies Private Limited 1-65 Chinapavani Prakasam Andhra Pradesh 523115 (Applicant) In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of Section 15 of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Regulations/ Rules/ Notifications/ Orders made thereunder, I pass the following Order The applicant has filed the compounding application dated March 28, 2019 received on April 4, 2019 for compounding of contraventions of the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (the FEMA) and the regulations issued thereunder. The contraventions sought to be compounded are (i) delay in reporting receipt of foreign inward remittances and (ii) delay in submission of Form FC-GPR to Reserve Bank of India after issue of shares towards subscription to equity and (iii)
Compounding of contraventions under FEMA 1999 M/s Unify Technologies Private Limited CA No. HYD 422 delay in filing of FLA returns in terms of Paragraph 9(1)(A), Paragraph 9(1)(B) and Paragraph 9(2) respectively of Schedule 1 to Foreign Exchange Management Regulations, 2000 notified vide Notification No. FEMA.20/2000-RB dated May 03, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as Notification No. FEMA 20/2000-RB) as then applicable and as amended. 2. The relevant facts of the case are as follows: a) The applicant is a resident company incorporated as Private Limited Company under the Companies Act, 1956 on 18/02/2014 (CIN: U72200AP2014PTC093022). The company is engaged in other information technology and computer service activities. b) The applicant had received foreign inward remittances from foreign investors
Name of remitter Date of Date of S.No Amount (INR) Receipt reporting SAS Holdings 1 8309880 29/03/2016 24/03/2018 LLC Total 83,09,880 as indicated below: The applicant reported receipt of remittances towards share subscription amounting to ₹ 83,09,880/- to the Regional Office of Reserve Bank of India with delay of 1 year 10 months 24 days approximately as indicated above. Whereas in terms of Paragraph 9(1)(A) of Schedule 1 to Notification No. FEMA 20/2000-RB, an Indian company issuing shares or convertible debentures in accordance with these Regulations should report to the Reserve Bank of India as per the prescribed procedure not later than 30 days from the date of receipt of the amount of consideration. c) The company allotted equity shares and filed form FC-GPRs as indicated below:
Compounding of contraventions under FEMA 1999 M/s Unify Technologies Private Limited CA No. HYD 422 Name of Amount for investor Date of No. of which Date of S.No allotment of Shares shares reporting to shares allotted allotted RBI (INR) SAS Holdings 09/07/2018 1 LLC 30/03/2016 600000 8310000
Vivek Nirkhe 75000(swap 2 31/08/2017 1698750 01/11/2018 basis) Total 675000 1,00,08,750 The applicant filed form FCGPRs for the allotment of shares amounting to ₹1, 00, 08,750/- as indicated above which were reported with delays ranging from 1 year 1 month 2 days to 2 years 2 months 10 days approximately beyond the prescribed limit. Whereas in terms of Paragraph 9(1) (B) of Schedule 1 to Notification no. FEMA 20/2000-RB, an Indian company issuing shares in accordance with these Regulations has to submit to Reserve Bank a report in form FCGPR along with documents prescribed therein within 30 days from the date of issue of shares to person resident outside India. d) The company had delayed in filing of FLA returns for 2 years as shown below:
Sl Particulars Financial Due date of Date of actual No year filing filing 1 FLA Return 2015-16 15/07/2016 22/05/2019 2 FLA Return 2016-17 15/07/2017 22/05/2019
The company had filed FLA returns for 2 years with delays ranging from 1 year 10 months 7 days to 2 years 10 months 7 days approximately. Whereas, in terms of Compounding of contraventions under FEMA 1999 M/s Unify Technologies Private Limited CA No. HYD 422 Paragraph 9(2) of Schedule I to Notification No. FEMA 20/2000-RB dated May 03, 2000 as then applicable and as amended, all Indian companies which have received Foreign Direct Investment in the previous year(s) including the current year shall submit to the Reserve Bank of India, on or before the 15th day of July of each year, a report titled ‘Annual Return on Foreign Liabilities and Assets’ (FLA) as specified by the Reserve Bank from time to time. 3. (a) The applicant was given an opportunity for personal hearing vide Reserve Bank’s letter No. HY.FE.FID/2901/14.66.003/2018-19 dated June 19, 2019 for further submission in person and/or producing documents, if any, in support of the application. (b) The authorized representatives of the company, Shri M. Sreedhar, Senior Manager,Finance and Shri P.Surya Prakash, Senior Associate, R&A Associates, appeared for personal hearing on June 24, 2019. He admitted the contraventions for which the compounding has been sought. During the personal hearing it was submitted that the delay was not wilful or with a malafide intention but was on account of administrative lapses. In view of the above, the applicant requested to take a lenient view in disposal of the application. The application for compounding is, therefore, being considered on the basis of the averments made in the application as well the submissions made in this context by the applicant during the personal hearing. 4. I have given my careful consideration to the documents on record. Accordingly, I hold that the applicant has contravened the following FEMA provisions issued in terms of: - (a) Paragraph 9(1)(A) of Schedule 1 to Notification No. FEMA 20/2000-RB for delay in reporting the receipt of consideration towards issue of shares amounting to ₹ 83,09,880/- and the delay is 1 year 10 months 24 days approximately. (b) Paragraph 9(1)(B) of Schedule 1 to Notification No. 20/2000-RB for delay in submission of Form FC-GPR to Reserve Bank of India after issue of shares
Compounding of contraventions under FEMA 1999 M/s Unify Technologies Private Limited CA No. HYD 422 amounting to ₹ 1,00,08,750/- to persons resident outside India and the delay ranges from 1 year 1 month 2 days to 2 years 2 months 10 days approximately. (c) Paragraph 9(2) of Schedule 1 to Notification No. 20/2000-RB for delay in filing of FLA returns and the delay ranges from 1 year 10 months 7 days to 2 years 10 months 7 days approximately. 5. It has been declared in the compounding application dated March 28, 2019 that the particulars given by the applicant in the application are true and correct to the best of their knowledge and belief. It has been declared in the declaration dated March 28, 2019 that the applicant was not under any enquiry/investigation/adjudication by any agency as on the date of the application and has, in this regard, not informed of initiation of any such enquiry/investigation/adjudication proceedings against it thereafter. It has further been declared that the applicant has not filed any appeal under section 17 or section 19 of FEMA, 1999. Accordingly, the above contraventions which are being compounded in this Order are subject to the veracity of the above declarations made by the applicant and this order is without prejudice to any other action which may be taken by any authority under the extant laws if the said declarations are subsequently discovered to be false and/or incorrect.
6. In terms of Section 13 of the FEMA, any person contravening any provision of the Act shall be liable to a penalty up to thrice the sum involved in such contravention upon adjudication. However, taking into account the relevant facts and circumstances of the case as stated in the foregoing paragraphs, I am persuaded to take a lenient view on the amount for which the contravention is to be compounded and I consider that an amount of ₹72,115/-(Rupees Seventy Two Thousand One Hundred and Fifteen Only) will meet the ends of justice. 7. Accordingly, I compound the admitted contraventions, namely, the contraventions of Paragraph 9(1)(A),Paragraph 9(1)(B) and Paragraph 9(2) respectively of Schedule 1 to FEMA.20/2000-RB by the applicant on the facts discussed above in Compounding of contraventions under FEMA 1999 M/s Unify Technologies Private Limited CA No. HYD 422 terms of the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000 on payment of an amount of ₹72,115/-(Rupees Seventy Two Thousand One Hundred and Fifteen Only) which shall be deposited by the applicant with the Reserve Bank of India, Foreign Exchange Department, 1st Floor, Saifabad, Hyderabad - 500004 by a demand draft drawn in favour of the "Reserve Bank of India" and payable at Hyderabad within a period of 15 days from the date of this order.
In case of failure to deposit the compounded amount within the above mentioned period, Rule 10 of the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000 dated May 3, 2000 shall apply.
The application is disposed of accordingly. Dated this 25th day of June 2019
Sd/- (Subrata Das) Regional Director (Andhra Pradesh and Telangana) and Chief General Manager (Hyderabad)
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free