Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Total Holdings SAS — Combination C-2019/10/694

Competition Commission Of India28 November 2019

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Commission will not reach a finding of appreciable adverse effect on competition where the combined market share of the parties in a horizontally overlapping market is not significant and other players are present to constrain them. The assessment rests on the factors in Section 20(4) of the Act. Where the Commission is satisfied that a proposed combination is not likely to cause appreciable adverse effect on competition in any relevant market, it need not define the relevant market and may leave that question open. Where the parties' presence in vertically related upstream and downstream markets is not significant, and other players operate in each segment to constrain them, a potential vertical relationship does not by itself support a finding of appreciable adverse effect on competition. Where the Commission finds no appreciable adverse effect on competition in any relevant market, it may approve the combination under Section 31(1) of the Act. That approval is conditional, in that it stands revoked if the information supplied by the acquirer is found to be incorrect.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

Fair CompetitionFor Greater GoodCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA28.11.2019

Notice u/s 6 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 Filed by Total Holdings SAS

CORAM: Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta Chairperson

Ms. Sangeeta Verma Member

Mr. Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi Member

Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002

1. On 16.10.2019, the Competition Commission of India (“Commission”) received a notice under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (“Act”) filed by Total Holdings SAS (“Total Holdings” / “Acquirer”). The proposed combination relates to acquisition of 37.40% of the paid up share capital and joint control of Adani Gas Limited (“AGL”/ “Target”) by Total Holdings (“Proposed Combination”). The notice was given pursuant to inter alia, Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 14.10.2019 executed between Sellers1 and Total Holdings (“Transaction Document”).

1 Adani Tradeline LLP, Shri Gautam S. Adani / Shri Rajesh Adani (on behalf of S. B. Adani Family Trust), Afro Asia Trade and Investments Limited, Universal Trade and Investments Limited, Worldwide Emerging Market Holding Ltd. and Flourishing Trade and Investment Limited (collectively referred to as ‘Sellers’)

For Greater Good

2. In terms of Regulation 14 of the Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to Combinations) Regulations, 2011 (“Combination Regulations”), vide email dated 07.11.2019, Acquirer was required to provide certain information(s) /clarification(s) inter alia, relating to Transaction Documents; response to the same was received on 15.11.2019, after seeking extension of time. Further, during the course of review of the Proposed Combination by the Commission, the Acquirer submitted certain information(s) /clarification(s) vide submissions on 06.11.2019 and 25.11.2019.

3. Total Holdings, a company incorporated in France, is a 100% subsidiary of Total S.A. (“Total”), which is the ultimate parent company of the Total group entities worldwide. As submitted, Total, together with its subsidiaries, is an international integrated energy producer and inter alia, have presence in oil and gas industry. In India, it is stated that Total Group is present through its subsidiaries, joint ventures and minority interests inter alia, engaged in export of natural gas at a wholesale level to Indian coasts where the respective customers purchase the same.

4. AGL, a public company incorporated in India, is a part of Adani Group. As submitted, it is inter alia, engaged in the wholesale supply of natural gas, and supply of natural gas through city gas distribution (CGD) networks in various cities e.g. Ahmedabad, Vadodara, to industrial, commercial, domestic and automotive customers in India.

5. It is noted that the Proposed Combination relates to natural gas sector in India. Both Total Group and AGL are engaged in ‘wholesale supply of natural gas in India’, as Total Group exports natural gas to India and AGL is also engaged in the wholesale supply of natural gas in India.

6. With regard to vertical relationship it is stated that Total Group and AGL do not have any existing vertical arrangements between them and are also not engaged in any complementary activities. However, it is noted that the broader market for natural gas is inherently vertically linked and involve several stages to finally reach end consumer. As both Total Group and AGL are present at different segments of overall supply chain of natural gas in India, there is For Greater Good potential for vertical relationship between them. While both Total Group and AGL have presence in wholesale supply of natural gas segment (upstream segment); only AGL is present in downstream (retail) supply of natural gas segment in India. The Acquirer has submitted the following relevant market(s) with regard to potential vertical relationship between parties; (i) the wholesale supply of natural gas in India (“Upstream Market”) and (ii) downstream (retail) supply of natural gas in India (“Downstream Market”).

7. However, since the Proposed Combination is not likely to cause appreciable adverse effect on competition in India, the definition of the relevant market in the present case is being left open.

8. In relation to horizontal overlap, it is noted that the combined market share of the parties in the market for wholesale supply of natural gas in India is not significant to raise any competition concern. Further, there are other players such as GAIL and IOCL present in the market to pose competitive constraints to the parties.

9. With regard to potential vertical relationship, it is noted that the presence of parties is not significant in both Upstream as well as Downstream Market(s) to raise any competition concern. Further, there are other players present in each of above market segments such as GAIL and IOC to pose competitive constraints to the parties.

10. Considering the facts on record and the details provided in the notice given under Section 6(2) of the Act and assessment of the Proposed Combination on the basis of factors stated in Section 20(4) of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that the Proposed Combination is not likely to have any appreciable adverse effect on competition in India in any of the relevant market(s) and therefore, the Commission hereby approves the same under Section 31(1) of the Act.

11. This order shall stand revoked if, at any time, the information provided by the Acquirer is found to be incorrect.

For Greater Good

12. The information provided by the Acquirer is confidential at this stage in terms of and subject to provisions of Section 57 of the Act.

13. The Secretary is directed to communicate to the Acquirer accordingly.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free