The Board Of Control For Cricket In India vs Cricket Association Of Bihar
- SCC(2022) 19 SCC 30
- Neutral2022 INSC 961
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a court has previously approved a constitution for an autonomous sports body and stipulated that amendments require a three-fourths majority and the court's prior leave, the court may permit amendments that modify the strictness of the original provisions if the amendments do not dilute the fundamental purpose and object underlying the adoption of those provisions. A cooling-off period provision requiring an office bearer to sit out for three years after two consecutive terms is not diluted by modifying it to apply only when both consecutive terms are held at the same organizational level (either state association or national body) rather than across different levels, provided the rule remains structured to prevent vesting of personal interests, concentration of power, and monopolistic control. A disqualification provision may be modified from disqualifying any office bearer charged with a criminal offence to disqualifying only those convicted and sentenced to imprisonment, and the scope of disqualification based on holding office in other sports bodies may be narrowed to allow individuals to participate in non-cricket sporting activities after retirement from cricket, where such modifications do not defeat the core purpose of ensuring fit and proper governance. Administrative amendments to provisions governing delegation of powers and chain of supervision within a sports body may be approved where they clarify reporting lines and operational control without altering substantive governance principles.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
IA No 49930 of 2020 in Civil Appeal No 4235 of 2014
The Board of Control for Cricket in India .... Appellant
Versus
Cricket Association of Bihar & Ors ....Respondents
JUDGMENT
Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J
1 By the judgment of this Court in Board of Control for Cricket in India v Cricket
Association of Bihar 1, the draft Constitution of the Board of Control for Cricket in
India 2 was approved. The Court stipulated that any amendment to the Constitution
shall not be given effect to without the leave of the Court. Clause 45 of the
Constitution, as approved, contains the following provision:
Signature Not Verified “These Rules and Regulations of the BCCI shall not be repealed, Digitally signed by CHETAN KUMAR Date: 2022.09.15 18:58:29 IST Reason: added to, amended or altered except when passed and adopted by a
1 (2018) 9 SCC 624 2 “BCCI” 2
3/4th majority of the members present and entitled to vote at a Special General Meeting of the General Body convened for the purpose or at the Annual General Meeting. Any such amendment will not be given effect to without the leave of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.”
2 On 1 December 2019, certain amendments were approved unanimously at the
Annual General Meeting 3.
3 An interim application has been filed for seeking the leave of the Court to give effect
to the amendments. A reference to the relevant clauses which are proposed to be
amended would be necessary.
4 Clause 6(4) of the existing Constitution contains the stipulation that an office bearer
who has held any post for two consecutive terms either in a state association or in
the BCCI or a combination of both shall not be eligible to contest any further election
without completing a cooling off period of three years. During the cooling off period,
there is a prohibition on an office bearer becoming a member of the Governing
Council or of any committee of the BCCI or of a state association. The rationale for
adopting a cooling off period was elaborated in Section C of the judgment of this
Court. The rationale was explained in paragraph 35 of the judgment in the following
terms:
“… A cooling-off period has several features which are of utmost importance:
(i) it is a safeguard against the development of vested personal interests;
3 “AGM” 3
(ii) it ensures against the concentration of power in a few hands;
(iii) it facilitates a dispersal of authority; and
(iv) it encourages the generation of a wider body of experienced administrators.
Cooling-off must be accepted as a means to prevent a few individuals from regarding the administration of cricket as a personal turf. The game will be better off without cricketing oligopolies.”
5 While explaining the proposed provision for a cooling off period after the completion
of two consecutive terms, this Court provided the following illustrations:
“However, in our view, it would be appropriate to direct that a cooling- off period of three years would apply after an individual holds two successive terms in office either in BCCI, or in any State Association or a combination of the two. For instance, if an office-bearer has held office for two consecutive terms in any post in a State Association, such an individual must face a cooling-off period of three years. Likewise, if an individual has held any post as an office-bearer of BCCI for a total period of six years in succession, the individual must have a cooling-off period of three years before seeking election again either to BCCI or to a State Association. The cooling-off period would apply also in a situation where an individual holds a post for one term in a State Association followed by a post in BCCI successively or vice versa. This would ensure that after a period of six years involving two consecutive terms, a cooling-off period would be attracted. Allowing an individual to act as an office-bearer for six years in continuation, is a sufficiently long period for experience and knowledge gained to be deployed in the interest of the game without at the same time resulting in a monopoly of power.”
6 An amendment of Clause 6.4 has been proposed on the ground that the BCCI
undertakes its activities both at the national and international level. On the other
hand, the activities of the state associations are conducted at the level of each state.
Though there may be a degree of overlap between the functions associated at the 4
state level, on the one hand, and the national level by the BCCI, on the other hand, it
has been submitted that the functions are distinct in a large number of areas and
activities.
7 Mr Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the applicant, submitted
that Clause 6(4), as approved by this Court, indicates that a person who has
completed one term at the state level followed by one term at the BCCI would have
to complete a cooling off period of three years. In other words, though an office
bearer at the BCCI has completed only one term at the BCCI, the cooling off period
would come into effect. It has been submitted that the unanimous view at the AGM
is that this provision should be modified so as to stipulate that the cooling off period
would come into effect after an office bearer has completed two consecutive terms
at the same level, that is in a state association or at the BCCI. In other words, an
office bearer who completes two consecutive terms in a state association would
necessarily have to complete a cooling off period of three years before assuming
any elected office at the state association. Likewise, an office bearer who completes
two consecutive terms at the BCCI would have to mandatorily undergo a cooling off
period of three years before seeking any election at the level of the BCCI.
8 The amended provision, as proposed at the AGM, seeks to confine the requirement
of a cooling off period only to the posts of President and Secretary. The amendment
as proposed envisages in other words that the cooling off period will not apply to
other posts.
5 9 Mr Maninder Singh, senior counsel, who was requested to assist this Court as an
amicus curiae, submitted that there would be no justification to confine the cooling
off period only to the post of President and Secretary and must extend to all other
office bearers of the BCCI and the state associations.
10 In order to bring clarity to the position, a tabulated chart has been placed before this
Court indicating:
(i) The existing provision;
(ii) The amended provision proposed by BCCI; and
(iii) The proposed clause after incorporating the suggestions made by the amicus
curiae.
11 The tabulated position (in track mode) reads as follows:
CLAUSE EXISTING PROVISION AMENDED PROVISION PROPOSED BY PROPOSED CLAUSE AFTER BCCI AMICUS’S SUGGESTION 6(4) A President or SecretaryAn office bearer 6.4.1 An office bearer who has held An office bearer who has held any post
who has served in such position held any any post for two consecutive terms in for two consecutive terms either in a post for two consecutive terms either in a the BCCI shall not be eligible to state association or in the BCCI (or a state association or in the BCCI (or a contest any further election in the combination of both) shall not be combination of both) shall not be eligible BCCI without completing a cooling off eligible to contest any further election to contest any further election without period of three years. without completing a cooling off period completing a cooling off period of three During this cooling off period, such an of three years. During the cooling off years. During the cooling off period, such office bearer shall not be a member of period, such an office bearer shall not ‘Office bearer’ an office bearer shall not the Governing Council or of any be a member of the Governing Council be a member of the Governing Council or committee whatsoever of the BCCI. or of any committee whatsoever of the of any committee whatsoever of the The expression ‘office bearer’ should BCCI or of a state association. The BCCI. or of a state association. The not be permitted to be circumvented expression ‘office bearer’ should not be expression ‘President’ or ‘Secretary’ by being a member of any other permitted to be circumvented by being office bearer’ should not be permitted to committee or of the Governing a member of any other committee or of be circumvented by being a member of Council in BCCI, as the case may be. the Governing Council in BCCI or any 6
state association, as the case may be. any other committee or of the Governing Council in BCCI or any state association, 6.4.2 If a person has served two as the case may be. consecutive terms each, in the State Association and in the BCCI [or vice versa] continuously without any break, such person shall not be eligible to contest any further election in the State Association or in the BCCI, without completing a cooling off period of three years.
During this cooling off period, such an office bearer shall not be a member of the Governing Council or of any committee whatsoever of the BCCI or of a state association. The expression ‘office bearer’ should not be permitted to be circumvented by being a member of any other committee or of the Governing Council in BCCI or any state association, as the case may be.
The State Associations may separately have the following clause:-
6.4.1 An office bearer who has held any post for two consecutive terms in the State Association shall not be eligible to contest any further election in such State Association without completing a cooling off period of three years.
During this cooling off period, such an office bearer shall not be a member of the Governing Council or of any committee whatsoever of the state association. The expression ‘office bearer’ should not be permitted to be circumvented by being a member of any other committee or of the Governing Council in the state association, as the case may be.
6.4.2 If a person has served two consecutive terms each, in the State 7
Association and in the BCCI [or vice versa] continuously without any break, such person shall not be eligible to contest any further election in the State Association or in the BCCI, without completing a cooling off period of three years.
During this cooling off period, such an office bearer shall not be a member of the Governing Council or of any committee whatsoever of the BCCI or of a state association. The expression ‘office bearer’ should not be permitted to be circumvented by being a member of any other committee or of the Governing Council in BCCI or any state association, as the case may be.
12 As the above tabulation indicates, the amicus curiae has proposed a bifurcation, for
the sake of clarity, of the existing provision by introducing similar requirements of
cooling off periods both at the level of the BCCI and in the state associations.
Clause 6(4), as originally incorporated, is hence sought to be bifurcated separately
for the BCCI and the state associations. The Solicitor General has stated that the
amendment as proposed by the amicus curiae is acceptable to the BCCI.
13 Having considered the application and the reasons which have been set out, we are
of the considered view that the amendment as proposed in the third column above,
should be accepted in terms of the suggestions of the amicus curiae. The reasons
for accepting the above proposal are indicated below.
14 The principal rationale for adopting a cooling off period has been explained in the
judgment of this Court, extracted above. This Court had adopted the rationale that 8
the cooling off period would kick in after an individual holds two successive terms in
office either at the BCCI or in any state association or a combination of the two. The
effective consequence of the existing position is that:
(i) A person who is elected as an office bearer in a state association for two
consecutive terms would have to undergo a cooling off period;
(ii) A person who is elected as an office bearer at the BCCI for two consecutive
period would have to undergo a cooling off period; and
(iii) A person who is elected as an office bearer in a state association for one term
followed by election as an office bearer at the BCCI for one term would
similarly have to undergo a cooling off period.
15 The consequence, therefore, is that a person who has held office as an elected
office bearer for only one term at the BCCI would have to undergo a cooling off
period. The submission is that the application of a cooling off period after one term
at a particular level (the BCCI or state association, as the case may be on after an
immediately prior term at another level) is unduly stringent and needs to be modified
having regard to the purpose for which the cooling off period was introduced.
16 BCCI is an autonomous sports body. The judgment of this court did not abrogate its
power, as a registered society, to amend its Constitution. The stipulation that an
amendment be carried by a three fourths majority and should not be implemented
without the prior leave of this court is in order to ensure that the purpose underlying 9
the adoption of the Constitution of BCCI is not defeated. The purpose for which the
cooling off period was introduced, would not be diluted by the proposed amendment,
subject to the stipulations suggested by the amicus curiae. The proposed stipulation
that the cooling off period comes into effect after two consecutive terms at the same
level namely, at the state associations or the BCCI does not abrogate the purpose of
a cooling off period. We, therefore, accept the amendment as set out in Column 3
above.
17 The next amendment is proposed to Clause 6(5) of the BCCI’s Constitution. As in
the case of Clause 6(4), the amendment which was proposed to Clause 6(5) was
deliberated upon during the course of the hearing and certain suggestions have
been made in the course of the discussion by the amicus curiae. The position is
tabulated below (in track mode):
CLAUSE EXISTING PROVISION AMENDED PROVISION PROPOSED BY PROPOSED CLAUSE AFTER BCCI AMICUS’S SUGGESTION 6(5) A person shall be disqualified from A person shall be disqualified from A person shall be disqualified from being an Office Bearer, or an Apex being an Office Bearer, a member of being an Office Bearer, a member of Council Member of the BCCI a member the Apex Council, Governing Council the Governing Council or any of the Governing Council or any or any Committee of the BCCI if he or Committee or a representative to the Committee or a representative to the she:
International Cricket Council or any International Cricket Council or any (a) is not a citizen of India; similar organization if he or she:
similar organization if he or she: (b) has attained the age of 70 (a) is not a citizen of India; (a) is not a citizen of India; years; (b) has attained the age of 70 (b) has attained the age of 70 (c) is declared to be insolvent, years; years; or of unsound mind; (c) is declared to be insolvent, or (c) is declared to be insolvent, or of (d) is a Minister or Government of unsound mind; unsound mind; Servant; (d) is a Minister or Government (d) is a Minister or Government Servant or holds a public (e) has been an Office Bearer Servant or holds a public office; office; of the BCCI for a (e) holds any office or post in a (e) holds any office or post in a cumulative period of 9 sports or athletic association or sports or athletic association years; or 10
or federation apart from federation apart from cricket; (f) has been convicted by a cricket; (f)(e) has been an Office Bearer of the Court of Law for (f) has been an Office Bearer of BCCI for a cumulative period of commission of a criminal the BCCI for a cumulative 9 years; or of a State offence and sentenced to period of 9 years or of a State association for a cumulative imprisonment. association for a cumulative period of 9 years; or period of 9 years; or (f) Has been convicted charged by (g) Has been charged by a Court a Court of Law for commission of Law for having committed of a having committed any any criminal offence, i.e. an criminal offence and sentenced order framing charges has to imprisonment for a period not been passed by a court of law less than three (3) years. having competent jurisdiction. 6.5.2 A person shall be disqualified from being a member of the Governing Council or any Committee of the BCCI if he or she: (a) is not a citizen of India; (b) is declared to be insolvent, or of unsound mind; (c) is a Minister or Government Servant; (d) Has, i.e. an order framing charges has been convicted passed by a Court of Law for commission of a criminal offence and sentenced to imprisonment for a period not less than three (3) years.court of law having competent jurisdiction.
18 BCCI has submitted that the disqualification from holding any office or post in a
sports or athletic association or federation apart from cricket needs to be modified
since several cricketers of eminence are associated with other sporting activities
such as football and golf after retirement from cricket and there is no reason to
disqualify them on that ground. Secondly, it has been submitted that the
disqualification which is attached to a person who is charged of having committed a 11
criminal offence is proposed to be modified so as to apply to a person who is
convicted of an offence and is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of three years.
This amendment, it has been submitted, is intended to protect office bearers who
may be subjected to frivolous prosecutions. Finally, it has been submitted that the
expression “or holds a public office” is over-broad and that the disqualification
should only apply to a person who holds office as a Minister or government servant.
19 The stipulation that the disqualification should attach on a conviction of an offence
may be accepted. However, the further condition that a disqualification would follow
upon a sentence of imprisonment of three years or more cannot be accepted. During
the hearing, BCCI agreed that the disqualification would govern a conviction and
sentence of imprisonment. The reasons set out for the other amendments are
acceptable. Subject to what has been observed above, the amendment as tabulated
in column 3 above does not detract from the basic purpose and object underlying
the judgment of this Court. The amendment, as proposed in Column 3 above, is
hence permitted to be effected.
20 An amendment has been proposed to Clauses 14.3 and 14.4, as well as to Clause
3(b)(vii) which are consequential to the amendments which have been made to
Clauses 6(4) and 6(5). The amendments to Clauses 14.3 and 14.4 and Clause
3(b)(vii) are in the following terms:
12 CLAUSE EXISTING PROVISION AMENDED PROVISION PROPOSED BY PROPOSED CLAUSE AFTER BCCI AMICUS’S SUGGESTION 14(3) and (4) 14.3 A person shall be disqualified from being a Councillor if he or she:
(a) is not a citizen of India;
(b) has attained the age of 70 years;
(c) is declared to be insolvent, or of unsound mind;
(d) is a Minister or Government Servant;
(e) has been an Office Bearer of the BCCI for a cumulative period of 9 years; or
(f) has been convicted by a Court of Law for commission of a criminal offence and sentenced to imprisonment.
14.4.1 Each of the elected Councillors shall have a term of 3 years in office, subject to a maximum of 3 Terms on the Apex Council.
A Councillor who has held any post for two consecutive Terms in the BCCI shall not be eligible to contest any further election in the BCCI without completing a cooling off period of three years. During the cooling off period, such a Councillor shall not be a member of the Governing Council or of any committee whatsoever of the BCCI.
The expression ‘Councillor’ should not be permitted to be circumvented by being a member of any other committee or of the Governing Council in BCCI.
14.4.2 If a person has served two consecutive terms each as Councillor, in the equivalent body of a State 13
Association and in the BCCI [or vice versa] continuously without any break, such person shall not be eligible to be a Councillor in the equivalent body of a State Association or in the BCCI, without completing a cooling off period of three years. During this cooling off period, such a Councillor shall not be a member of the Governing Council or of any committee whatsoever of the BCCI or of a State Association.
The expression ‘Councillor’ should not be permitted to be circumvented by being a member of any other committee or of the Governing Council in BCCI or any State Association, as the case may be.
3(b)(vii) There shall be a provision whereby an 3(b)(vii)(A) There shall be a provision office bearer or an elected member of whereby an office bearer or an the Governing Council / Managing elected member of the Governing Committee / Apex Council who has Council / Managing Committee / Apex held any post for two consecutive Council who has held any post for two terms either in the State Association or consecutive terms in the State in the BCCI (or a combination of both) Association shall not be eligible to shall not be eligible to contest any contest any further election in such further election without completing a State Association without completing cooling off period of three years. a cooling off period of three years. During the cooling off period, such an During this cooling off period, such an office bearer or an elected member of office bearer or an elected member of the Governing Body / Managing the Governing Council / Managing Committee / Apex Council shall not be Committee / Apex Council shall not a member of the Governing Council or be a member of the Governing of any Committee whatsoever of the Council or of any committee BCCI or of a State Association. whatsoever of the state association.
The expression ‘office bearer’ should not be permitted to be circumvented by being a member of any other committee or of the Governing Council in the state association, as 14
the case may be.
3(b)(vii)(B) There shall be a provision whereby if a person has served two consecutive terms each, in the State Association and in the BCCI [or vice versa] continuously without any break, such person shall not be eligible to contest any further election in the State Association or in the BCCI, without completing a cooling off period of three years.
During this cooling off period, such an office bearer or an elected member of the Governing Council / Managing Committee / Apex Council shall not be a member of the Governing Council or of any committee whatsoever of the BCCI or of a state association. The expression ‘office bearer’ should not be permitted to be circumvented by being a member of any other committee or of the Governing Council in BCCI or any state association, as the case may be.
21 Certain amendments of an administrative nature are proposed in Clauses 7(3), 15(3)
and (4) and 19(2), which are tabulated below:
CLAUSE EXISTING PROVISION AMENDED PROVISION PROPOSED BY PROPOSED CLAUSE AFTER BCCI AMICUS’S SUGGESTION 7(3) The Secretary shall; The Secretary shall; The Secretary shall;
(a) to (e) ............... (a) to (e) ............... (a) to (e) ...............
(f) Have the power to delegate any work (f) Have the power to delegate any Have the power to delegate any work to the Honorary Joint Secretary. to the Honorary Joint Secretary or any work to the Honorary Joint Secretary person in management. or any person in management.
(g) Exercise all powers in relation to (g) Exercise all powers in relation to cricketing and non cricketing matters with cricketing and non cricketing matters the respective management personnel with the respective management including CEO reporting to him on a personnel including CEO reporting to 15
regular basis. him on a regular basis.
(h) the Management personnel, the staff (h) the Management personnel, the and the CEO shall work under the direct staff and the CEO shall work under supervision, control and direction of the the direct supervision, control and Secretary. direction of the Secretary.
15(3) and (3) The Apex Council shall exercise (3) The Apex Council shall exercise (3) The Apex Council shall exercise (4) superintendence over the CEO, superintendence over the CEO, superintendence over the the Cricket Committees and the the Cricket Committees and the CEO, the Cricket Standing Committees in the Standing Committees through Committees and the discharge of their duties the Secretary in the discharge of Standing Committees, generally, and in particular, in their duties generally, and in through the Secretary, in accordance with any general or particular, in accordance with the discharge of their duties special direction of the General any general or special direction generally, and in particular, Body, except for the Governing of the General Body, except for in accordance with any Council of the IPL which is the Governing Council of the IPL general or special direction directly accountable to the which is directly accountable to of the General Body, except General Body. the General Body. for the Governing Council (4) In addition to and without prejudice (4) In addition to and without prejudice of the IPL which is directly to the generality of powers to the generality of powers accountable to the General conferred directly or by conferred directly or by Body.
necessary implication under necessary implication under (4) In addition to and without these Rules and regulations and these Rules and regulations and prejudice to the generality the Memorandum of Association, the Memorandum of of powers conferred directly the Apex Council shall exercise Association, the Apex Council or by necessary implication the powers and perform the shall exercise the powers and under these Rules and duties hereafter mentioned: perform the duties hereafter regulations and the
(a) to (c) …............ mentioned: Memorandum of
(d) To institute or defend any action or (a) to (c) …............ Association, the Apex proceedings for or against the (d) To institute or defend through Council shall exercise the BCCI or against any Office‐ the Secretary any action powers and perform the Bearer or employee of the BCCI. or proceedings for or duties hereafter mentioned:
against the BCCI or (a) to (c) …............
(e) to (m) ............(n) To frame, in against any Office‐Bearer (d) To institute or defend, consultation with the CEO, rules for the or employee of the BCCI. through the Secretary, appointment of Managers, Secretaries, any action or Administrative Officers, Peons and (e) to (m) ............
proceedings for or other service personnel and staff and against the BCCI or
for payment to them and other persons (n) To frame, in consultation with the against any Office‐ in return for their services rendered to CEO, rules for the appointment of Bearer or employee of the BCCI, salaries, wages, gratuities, Managers, Secretaries, Administrative the BCCI.
16 pensions, honorariums, Officers, Peons and other service (e) to (m) ............ compensations, any exgratia payment personnel and staff and for payment to (n) To frame, in consultation and/or provident fund and to regulate them and other persons in return for their with the CEO, rules discipline by suspending, fining, services rendered to the BCCI, salaries, for the appointment of removing or dismissing such wages, gratuities, pensions, Managers, employees. honorariums, compensations, any Secretaries, exgratia payment and/or provident fund Administrative and to regulate discipline by suspending, Officers, Peons and fining, removing or dismissing such other service employees. personnel and staff and for payment to them and other persons in return for their services rendered to the BCCI, salaries, wages, gratuities, pensions, honorariums, compensations, any exgratia payment and/or provident fund and to regulate discipline by suspending, fining, removing or dismissing such employees.
19(2) (2) The day‐to‐day management of (2) The day to day management of the (2) The day‐to‐day management of the BCCI shall be conducted by BCCI shall be conducted by the the BCCI shall be conducted by professionals in both cricketing professionals in both cricketing the professionals in both and non‐cricketing matters. and non‐cricketing matters under cricketing and non‐cricketing the direct supervision, direction matters under the direct and control of the respective supervision, direction and Office Bearers. control of the respective Office Bearers.
22 The above amendments as tabulated in Column 3 above are accepted.
23 An amendment was sought in Clause 45 to delete the provision requiring the leave of
the Court to amend BCCI’s Constitution. The proposed amendment is not pressed
by BCCI.
17 24 Paragraphs 45.2 and 45.3 of the earlier judgment of this Court dated 9 August 2018
reported in (2018) 9 SCC 624 contains the following directions:
“45.2. Upon the registration of the said Constitution of BCCI, each of the members shall undertake registration of their respective Constitutions on similar lines within a period of 30 days thereafter. A compliance certificate must be furnished to the CoA, which shall file a status report before this Court with reference to the compliance undertaken by the State Associations; and
45.3. In the event that any State Association does not undertake compliance with the abovesaid directions, the directions contained in the orders of this Court dated 7-10-2016 [BCCI v. Cricket Assn. of Bihar, (2016) 10 SCC 23] and 21-10-2016 [BCCI v. Cricket Assn. of Bihar, (2016) 10 SCC 231] shall revive.”
25 The above directions shall also apply to the amendments as approved by the
present judgment.
26 Mr Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, counsel, appeared in these proceedings on behalf of
two individuals who were earlier, members of an entity called Association of Bihar
Cricket. While opposing the amendments, counsel submitted that any modification
of the clauses in the terms as proposed would affect the underlying object of the
provisions in the original Constitution.
27 Having carefully assessed the grievance, we do not find any merit for the reasons
which we have already indicated.
18 28 The interim application is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.
…..…..…....…........……………….…........J. [Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud]
…..…..…....…........……………….…........J. [Hima Kohli]
New Delhi;
September 14, 2022
-S-
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free