Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. vs Manoj Misra
- SCC(2019) 10 SCC 104
- Neutral2019 INSC 1192
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a regulatory body has issued directions in environmental remediation proceedings, and subsequently issues a modified direction that supersedes and replaces the earlier direction addressing the same subject-matter, the later direction shall govern and the earlier direction need not be implemented.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
coverage thereof and the pollution resulting
therefrom.
b) Steps required to be taken for ensuring and
rendering river Yamuna free from pollution.
c) Restoration and beautification of the banks of river
Yamuna.
2. Expert Committees were constituted by the Tribunal
which submitted their reports on 19.04.2014 and
13.10.2014. After a careful scrutiny, the Tribunal accepted
the reports of the Expert Committees.
3. The O.As. were disposed of by the Tribunal by its
judgment dated 13.01.2015 in which several directions were
issued. The Tribunal heard several Miscellaneous
Applications that were filed in the O.A.s and issued
directions for the phased implementation of the judgment
2 | Page dated 13.01.2015. In this appeal, we are concerned with
directions 15, 16 and 17 which are as follows:
“15. The cost of the project is 3659 crores which includes establishing of new STP’s as well as providing of interceptors and sewer line in relation to the first phase only.
16. Finances for the project shall be resourced inter alia but definitely from the Ministry of Water Resources under the National Mission for Clean Ganga. DDA has nearly 281 unauthorized colonies and 10.80 lakhs residential flats in various parts of Delhi, thus, heavily contributing to the generation of the sewage. We direct Ministry of Urban Development under Urban Development fund to require DDA to release funds.
Delhi Jal Board and NCT, Delhi shall finance this project primarily.
All these Ministries, Delhi Development Authority, Delhi Jal Board and other authorities of NCT, Delhi would share the liability in the proportion that may be determined by the Principle Committee under this Judgment keeping in view the total cost of first phase of the project.
We direct NCT of Delhi, Delhi Jal Board and all Municipal Corporations, Cantonment Board, electricity companies like BSES and all other civic authorities to require payment of environmental compensation from every house hold which is generating sewage in the entire NCT of Delhi on the Polluters Pay Principle. It will be irrespective of whether a house hold is sewered
3 | Page or not. This would be equally applicable to the house hold located in the unauthorized colonies.
17. The monthly compensation payable by all the house hold in the NCT Delhi would be directly proportionate to the property tax or water bill whichever is higher, payable by such house hold. Where the house hold or person is not paying water bill, property tax and are located in un-authorized colonies, in that event, such house hold shall pay the sum of Rs.100 or Rs. 500 per month as the case may be. This amount would be determined by the concerned authority with reference to the construction existing on the plot.
The payment of the ‘environmental compensation’ in terms of the above clauses shall be added to electricity bills, water bill and the property tax demand in order of preference by the respective departments which will transfer the money to NCT, Delhi.”
4. The Appellant which is an electricity distribution
licensee filed this appeal against the order dated
08.05.2015 questioning the directions issued by the Tribunal
to the effect the environmental compensation has to be
collected from every household by adding it to the
electricity bill. By an order dated 13.10.2015, this Court
stayed the operation of the judgment dated 13.01.2015 and
the order dated 08.05.2015 which was modified on
4 | Page 18.01.2016 by restricting the interim relief only to the
extent it related to the Appellant. The Tribunal was
reviewing the progress in the execution of the directions
issued by the Tribunal by its judgment dated 13.01.2015
periodically. In the said process the Tribunal passed an
order dated 11.09.2019 which dealt with levying of
environmental compensation. The Chief Secretary,
Government of NCT of Delhi, Delhi Jal Board and the Delhi
Municipal Corporations were directed to introduce the
regime of levy of sewerage charges within two months
including in areas where network have been laid (whole of
East Delhi).
5. The Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC)
filed its response to the appeal pursuant to the direction of
this Court. According to the DERC, the revenue of
distribution licensees from the sale of electricity cannot be
used towards the collection of the environment
compensation fees. It was further stated on behalf of the
DERC that the costs incurred by the Appellant towards
collection of the environment compensation fee cannot be
passed on to the consumers in the form of a hike in tariff.
The DERC asserted that the imposition of any additional
tariff burden on the consumers resulting from costs incurred 5 | Page towards collection of environment compensation fee would
be contrary to the object and purpose of the Delhi Electricity
Reforms Act, 2000 and the Electricity Act, 2003.
6. We are informed that the directions issued by the
Tribunal on 11.09.2019 could not be implemented due to the
interim order passed by this Court in the above appeals.
7. The final judgment in O.A. No.6 of 2012 and O.A.
No.300 of 2013 was passed on 13.01.2015. Later, the
Tribunal issued direction relating to the imposition of
environment fee on all the households by an order dated
08.05.2015. The latest order passed by the Tribunal is
dated 11.09.2019. Without commenting upon the
correctness or otherwise of the direction issued by the
Tribunal on 08.05.2015, we are of the opinion that the
direction issued by the Tribunal on 11.09.2019 shall be
implemented and sewerage charges shall be introduced by
the Government of NCT of Delhi as directed by the Tribunal.
8. In view of the direction issued by the Tribunal on
11.09.2019 for the introduction of levy of sewerage charges,
the direction issued by the Tribunal on 08.05.2015 stands
modified and need not be implemented. The direction
6 | Page issued on 11.09.2019 shall be implemented within a period
of two months from today.
9. The appeals are disposed of, accordingly.
..…................................J [L. NAGESWARA RAO]
..…................................J [HEMANT GUPTA] New Delhi, October 24, 2019
7 | Page
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free