Steel Authority Of India LTD.(SUCCESSOR To Hindustan Steel L vs Life Insurance Corporationof India & Ors.
- SCC(1997) 5 SCC 511
- Neutral1997 INSC 511
- AIRAIR 1997 SC 2590
- SCR[1997] Supp (1) SCR 378
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Directions issued by the Supreme Court to constitute a High-power Committee to resolve disputes between Public Sector Undertakings and the Government were intended to address fiscal disputes and major policy matters where amicable settlement could conserve public money and court time, and were not intended to extend to disputes concerning eviction of occupants under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, which are matters of lesser magnitude not requiring the attention of high-level officers.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
PETITIONER: STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.(SUCCESSOR TO HINDUSTAN STEEL L
Vs.
RESPONDENT: LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATIONOF INDIA & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/05/1997
BENCH: K. RAMASWAMY, D.P. WADHWA
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
O R D E R This special leave petition has been filed against the order of the High Court of Delhi, made on 13.3.1997 in C.W. No. 1085/97.
The predecessor of the petitioner-Company had taken on rent the disputed premises, fro the Life Insurance Corporation, on 4th floor of Jeevan Deep Building, Parliament Street, New Delhi. Since the petitioner had not vacated the premises, action was taken eviction under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act. The petitioner challenged the action in the High Court contending that this Court has issued directions in I.A. Nos. 4 and 4 of 1992 in Civil Appeal Nos. 2058-59/88 to constitute a High-power Committee to resolve the disputes between the Public Sector Undertaking and the Government of India of the concerned Ministry, by a Committee composed of Cabinet Secretary, Secretary in Ministry of Law and Secretary in the Bureau of Public Sector Undertakings to decide the disputes without needless consumption of time and waste of public funds. The petitioner has sought for such a reference and contends the High-power Committee should have been constituted and decided the matter. We find no force in the contention.
The object of issuing direction in those matters was to decide the fiscal disputes in case of major policy matter to save the public money and court valuable time, and disputes could amicably be settled between the Public Sector Undertaking and the Government of India or the State Government. The intention was not to resolve the disputes like eviction of a company or public Undertaking under Public Premises (Unauthorised Occupants) Act; such petty disputes are not directed to be dealt with by the High level officers whose otherwise duty and time is of very important nature. Under these circumstances, the High Court has not committed any error warranting interference.
The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free