State Of Maharashtra vs Abhay And Ors.
- SCC1984 Supp (1) SCC 701
- AIRAIR 1985 SC 328
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The findings recorded by the High Court regarding whether a particular candidate (respondent) qualifies for reservation as a member of a Scheduled Tribe shall be confined to that individual candidate alone and shall not operate as res judicata or bind the State or any competent authority from reopening and reconsidering afresh, on merits, the broader question of whether the community in question is entitled to Scheduled Tribe status and reservation benefits generally. A provisional certificate issued to a candidate for purposes of claiming a reserved seat, which is liable to be cancelled or varied after admission has been granted, creates an unreasonable and objectionable procedure that causes irreparable harm and frustration to the candidate; the State ought instead to devise a rational procedure whereby the substantive inquiry into the candidate's entitlement to reservation is completed, and a final certificate issued, before admission is granted rather than after, with such inquiry being initiated promptly after the candidate clears the relevant board examination and preferably completed at least two months before the results of the final examination on which admission eligibility depends.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
1. We are not inclined to grant special leave in this matter. However, before we reject the same we want to make it specifically clear that the findings recorded by the High Court in the writ petition filed before it and from the judgment of which the present special leave petition arises shall remain confined and be held applicable only to the petitioner before the High Court who is respondent before us and none else. By this we mean that the certificate issued in favour of the respondent candidate shall remain valid in his favour on the footing that he qualified for the reservation But the larger question decided by the High Court as to whether 'Halba' is a Scheduled Tribe and entitled to reservation is kept open and it would be always open to the State of Maharashtra and any other competent authority to raise that question and the same shall be dealt with on merits and not held concluded by the judgment under appeal.
2. To avoid disputes like the present one where admission is granted on a provisional certificate which is liable to be varied or cancelled at a later stage causing irreparable harm and deep frustration to the candidate who secured coveted admission on a provisional certificate but the specter of expulsion haunts him, State of Maharashtra should devise and frame a more rational method for obtaining much in advance a certificate on the strength of which a reserved seat is claimed. The present method of issuing provisional certificate which can be invalidated at a later stage is objectionable for more than one reason. We consider it more desirable that the State of Maharashtra shall devise a proper procedure which must commence soon after the candidate clears examination by the Board at the end of Xth year in secondary school for issuing the final certificate after making whatever necessary enquiry they may want to initiate before the certificate can be granted and submitted for admission on passing Higher Secondary examination The intending candidate may be directed to preferably make the requisite application as soon as or soon after he gets admission in XI standard On receipt of the application, the enquiry may start as early as possible and the candidate will have to submit to such enquiry to obtain a regular certificate, whatever enquiry is to be held must be completed at least two months before the result of Higher Secondary examination is declared where after one becomes eligible to seek admission to a medical college. We hope that the State of Maharashtra will devise a proper scheme in this behalf, With these observations special leave petition is dismissed.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free