State Of M.P vs Mohan Lal
- SCC(2016) 16 SCC 608
- Neutral2015 INSC 615
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an employee engaged on a daily wage basis approaches Industrial Disputes Act authorities more than 14 years after discontinuation of employment, reinstatement to the position of daily wager may be modified in favour of monetary compensation, having regard to the delay in approaching the authorities and the nature of the employment, and such compensation may be awarded as final settlement instead of directing reinstatement.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
The respondent was employed as a Chowkidar on daily wage basis and for some reasons he was discontinued in the year 1994. More than 14 years thereafter, he approached the competent authorities under the Industrial Disputes Act and by the Award dated 17.08.2012 passed by the Labour Court, it was directed that he should be reinstated in service without back wages. The said Award has been upheld by the High Court.
Being aggrieved by the order passed by the High Court, the appellant has approached this Court.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. In view of the Order dated 15.09.2014 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal No. 9675 of 2014 titled as “State of M.P. & Anr. vs. Vinod Kumar Tiwari”, in our considered opinion, it is a fit case where some compensation should be awarded to the respondent instead of directing the appellant to reinstate him to his position as a daily wage Chowkidar.
Looking at the facts of the case and in view of the fact that the respondent was appointed on daily wage basis and had approached the authorities after more than 14 years, we direct that by way of final settlement, instead of reinstatement as a daily wager, the respondent be paid a sum of Rs. 2 lacs, in addition to what has already been paid to him when the notice had been issued.
The Award dated 17.08.2012 in Reference Case No. 65/2009/ID Act passed by the Labour Court, Ujjain, M.P. and confirmed by the High Court stands modified accordingly. The aforesaid amount shall be paid by the appellant to the respondent within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
The appeal is allowed with no order as to costs.
...........................J. (ANIL R. DAVE)
..........................J. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) NEW DELHI, AUGUST 28, 2015
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free