Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Somesh Choudhary vs Syndicate Interglobe

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal19 November 2019

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has been settled and withdrawn by the operational creditor after admission but before the constitution of the Committee of Creditors, the Adjudicating Authority should dispose of the withdrawal application by an appropriate order under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 rather than adjourn it, and the Appellate Tribunal may exercise its inherent power under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016 to set aside the initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and allow the withdrawal.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1181 of 2019IN THE MATTER OF:

Somesh Choudhary ...Appellant

Vs

Syndicate Interglobe ....Respondents

Present: For Appellant: Mr. P. Nagesh, Mr. Aditya Sharma and Mr. Gautam Sharma, Advocates. For Respondents: Mr. Neeraj Kr. Gupta, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta, IRP.

ORDER

19.11.2019: Respondent - 'M/s Syndicate Interglobe' (Operational

Creditor) filed application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy

Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as 'I&B Code') for initiation of Corporate

Insolvency Resolution Process against 'M/s Global Fragrances (P) Ltd.'

(Corporate Debtor). The application was rejected by the Adjudicating Authority

(National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi, Court-III by order dated 25th

September, 2019. After the admission but before the constitution of

Committee of Creditors, the parties reached Terms of Settlement on 30th

October, 2019.

2. Mr. Neeraj Kr. Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Operational Creditor also accepts that the Terms of Settlement reached

between the parties on 30th October, 2019 i.e. prior to constitution of

Committee of Creditors. In terms of Terms of Settlement part of the payment -2-

has been paid and rest part is payable. Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta, Interim

Resolution Professional appears in person and accepts that the Committee of

Creditors had not been constituted as on 30th October, 2019 when the

settlement was made.

3. According to learned counsel for the parties before constitution of

Committee of Creditors, the Operational Creditor filed application for

withdrawal of application under Section 9 on 30th October, 2019 but the same

was adjourned by impugned order dated 31st October, 2019.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that the

parties having settled the matter on 30th October, 2019 i.e. before the

constitution of Committee of Creditors and application having filed by 'M/s

Syndicate Interglobe' (Operational Creditor) for withdrawal of application under

Section 9, the Adjudicating Authority instead of adjourning the matter should

have passed appropriate order in exercise of power conferred under Rule 11 of

the NCLT Rules, 2016. The Adjudicating Authority having failed to do so, we

exercise inherent power conferred under Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules, 2016 and set

aside the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated against 'M/s Global

Fragrances (P) Ltd.' (Corporate Debtor) by order dated 25th September, 2019

and allow the application filed by the Respondent - 'M/s Syndicate Interglobe'

(Operational Creditor) for withdrawal of application under Section 9. The

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1181 of 2019 -3-

Company Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. The Adjudicating

Authority will close the proceeding. So far fee and cost incurred during

Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process by Interim Resolution Professional is

concerned, he having worked for about 45 days and cost incurred for

publication etc. as per his statement, we ascertain the fee and cost at

Rs.2.50 Lakhs (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only). The Appellant has

agreed to pay the said amount to the Interim Resolution Professional.

5. We accordingly direct the Appellant to pay the rest of the amount to the

Operational Creditor within the time as agreed in the Terms of Settlement. The

Appellant/ Corporate Debtor will also pay the fee of Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta,

Interim Resolution Professional alongwith cost of CIRP amounting to Rs.2.50

Lakhs before three weeks. The appeal is allowed with aforesaid observations

and directions.

[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson

[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Member (Judicial)

[Justice Venugopal M.] Member (Judicial) am/sk

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1181 of 2019

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free