Somesh Choudhary vs Syndicate Interglobe
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1181 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has been settled and withdrawn by the operational creditor after admission but before the constitution of the Committee of Creditors, the Adjudicating Authority should dispose of the withdrawal application by an appropriate order under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 rather than adjourn it, and the Appellate Tribunal may exercise its inherent power under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016 to set aside the initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and allow the withdrawal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Somesh Choudhary ...Appellant
Vs
Syndicate Interglobe ....Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. P. Nagesh, Mr. Aditya Sharma and Mr. Gautam Sharma, Advocates. For Respondents: Mr. Neeraj Kr. Gupta, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta, IRP.
ORDER
19.11.2019: Respondent - 'M/s Syndicate Interglobe' (Operational
Creditor) filed application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as 'I&B Code') for initiation of Corporate
Insolvency Resolution Process against 'M/s Global Fragrances (P) Ltd.'
(Corporate Debtor). The application was rejected by the Adjudicating Authority
(National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi, Court-III by order dated 25th
September, 2019. After the admission but before the constitution of
Committee of Creditors, the parties reached Terms of Settlement on 30th
October, 2019.
2. Mr. Neeraj Kr. Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Operational Creditor also accepts that the Terms of Settlement reached
between the parties on 30th October, 2019 i.e. prior to constitution of
Committee of Creditors. In terms of Terms of Settlement part of the payment -2-
has been paid and rest part is payable. Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta, Interim
Resolution Professional appears in person and accepts that the Committee of
Creditors had not been constituted as on 30th October, 2019 when the
settlement was made.
3. According to learned counsel for the parties before constitution of
Committee of Creditors, the Operational Creditor filed application for
withdrawal of application under Section 9 on 30th October, 2019 but the same
was adjourned by impugned order dated 31st October, 2019.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that the
parties having settled the matter on 30th October, 2019 i.e. before the
constitution of Committee of Creditors and application having filed by 'M/s
Syndicate Interglobe' (Operational Creditor) for withdrawal of application under
Section 9, the Adjudicating Authority instead of adjourning the matter should
have passed appropriate order in exercise of power conferred under Rule 11 of
the NCLT Rules, 2016. The Adjudicating Authority having failed to do so, we
exercise inherent power conferred under Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules, 2016 and set
aside the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated against 'M/s Global
Fragrances (P) Ltd.' (Corporate Debtor) by order dated 25th September, 2019
and allow the application filed by the Respondent - 'M/s Syndicate Interglobe'
(Operational Creditor) for withdrawal of application under Section 9. The
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1181 of 2019 -3-
Company Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. The Adjudicating
Authority will close the proceeding. So far fee and cost incurred during
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process by Interim Resolution Professional is
concerned, he having worked for about 45 days and cost incurred for
publication etc. as per his statement, we ascertain the fee and cost at
Rs.2.50 Lakhs (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only). The Appellant has
agreed to pay the said amount to the Interim Resolution Professional.
5. We accordingly direct the Appellant to pay the rest of the amount to the
Operational Creditor within the time as agreed in the Terms of Settlement. The
Appellant/ Corporate Debtor will also pay the fee of Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta,
Interim Resolution Professional alongwith cost of CIRP amounting to Rs.2.50
Lakhs before three weeks. The appeal is allowed with aforesaid observations
and directions.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Member (Judicial)
[Justice Venugopal M.] Member (Judicial) am/sk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1181 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free