Shrikant Mishra vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh
- SCC(2019) 13 SCC 381
- Neutral2018 INSC 1083
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a criminal appeal has been pending in the High Court for an extended period, and the appellant has already served a substantial portion of his sentence (over 11 years of actual imprisonment with additional remission), the Supreme Court may exercise its discretion under its appellate jurisdiction to release the appellant on bail during the pendency of the High Court appeal, subject to rigorous conditions to be fixed by the trial court, provided the appellant is not required to be detained in any other case.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). _____ OF 2018 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. 8856 OF 2018]
SHRIKANT MISHRA Appellant(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant has been convicted under Section
302/34 IPC on the file of Additional Sessions Judge,
Gonda and has been sentenced to life imprisonment
among other sentences. His appeal, being Criminal
Appeal No. 1111 of 2008 has been pending before the
High Court of Judicature of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench.
3. When the matter came up to this Court on
admission, on 10.10.2018, we directed the appellant
to produce the Custody Certificate. Accordingly, the
appellant has produced the Custody Certificate from
the Superintendent of Jail. It is seen from the Signature Not Verified Custody Certificate that the appellant has spent more Digitally signed by JAYANT KUMAR ARORA Date: 2019.01.19 10:35:10 IST Reason: than 11 years of actual period of sentence in jail
and with remission, much more.
2
4. Be that as it may, since the appeal is yet to be
taken up for final hearing before the High Court, we
are of the view that during the pendency of the
appeal before the High Court, the appellant be
released on bail, subject to such rigorous conditions
as may be fixed by the trial court. Ordered
accordingly.
5. The appellant is directed to be released on bail
during the pendency of the appeal before the High
Court, subject to such rigorous conditions as may be
fixed by the trial court, in case he is not required
to be detained in any other case.
6. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of.
.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J. [ DEEPAK GUPTA ]
.......................J. [ HEMANT GUPTA ]
New Delhi;
November 20, 2018.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free