Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Shrikant Mishra vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court20 November 2018Hemant Gupta · Deepak Gupta · Kurian Joseph

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a criminal appeal has been pending in the High Court for an extended period, and the appellant has already served a substantial portion of his sentence (over 11 years of actual imprisonment with additional remission), the Supreme Court may exercise its discretion under its appellate jurisdiction to release the appellant on bail during the pendency of the High Court appeal, subject to rigorous conditions to be fixed by the trial court, provided the appellant is not required to be detained in any other case.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

1NON-REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). _____ OF 2018[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. 8856 OF 2018]

SHRIKANT MISHRA Appellant(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondent(s)

J U D G M E N T

KURIAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant has been convicted under Section 302/34 IPC on the file of Additional Sessions Judge, Gonda and has been sentenced to life imprisonment among other sentences. His appeal, being Criminal Appeal No. 1111 of 2008 has been pending before the High Court of Judicature of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench.

3. When the matter came up to this Court on admission, on 10.10.2018, we directed the appellant to produce the Custody Certificate. Accordingly, the appellant has produced the Custody Certificate from the Superintendent of Jail. It is seen from the Custody Certificate that the appellant has spent more than 11 years of actual period of sentence in jail and with remission, much more.

2 4. Be that as it may, since the appeal is yet to be taken up for final hearing before the High Court, we are of the view that during the pendency of the appeal before the High Court, the appellant be released on bail, subject to such rigorous conditions as may be fixed by the trial court. Ordered accordingly.

5. The appellant is directed to be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal before the High Court, subject to such rigorous conditions as may be fixed by the trial court, in case he is not required to be detained in any other case.

6. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of.

.......................J.

[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]

.......................J.

[ DEEPAK GUPTA ]

.......................J.

[ HEMANT GUPTA ]

New Delhi;

November 20, 2018.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free