Shashendra Lahri vs Unicef And Ors.
- SCC(1997) 11 SCC 446
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
In assessing compensation for permanent disability caused by a motor accident, the court must consider the claimant's age at the time of the accident, his educational qualifications and academic prospects, and the adverse effect of the permanent disability on his future earning capacity and life prospects; an award that fails to adequately account for these factors, particularly where the claimant was young with good academic prospects at the time of injury, may be enhanced to a level that reasonably reflects the long-term impact of the disability on his future prospects.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
2. In a motor accident which occurred on 6.1.1977, the appellant Shashendra Lahiri suffered multiple injuries which required his treatment as an indoor patient in a hospital at Bhopal and then in a Bombay hospital for a considerable period. The injuries caused several fractures and bone-grafting was required to be done in Bombay. The appellant suffered permanent disability of shortening of his right leg by 3 inches. He was then a student of B.Com. aged about 17 years. It is common ground that the appellant thereafter continued his education and has a good academic career. The Tribunal awarded the sum of Rs. 33.000/- only with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum towards the claim of more than Rs. 6,00,000/- by the appellant. High Court has enhanced that amount to the total of Rs. 58,000/- with interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of the claim, until payment. This further appeal by the claimant is for enhancement of that amount.
3. The narration of facts as above is sufficient to indicate that the total award of Rs. 58,000/- inclusive of the expenses, is too inadequate for the permanent disability suffered by the claimant. In the special leave petition, the appellant has said that the minimum enhancement of Rs. 4,00,000/- should have been made by the High Court in the facts and circumstances of the present case. In our opinion, this prayer of the appellant is quite reasonable. In view of the age of the appellant at the time of the accident and the prospects in view of his good academic career, the adverse effect of his permanent disability as a result of the motor accident on his future prospects, is much more than that assessed by the High Court. The award of a further sum of Rs. 4,00,000/- in addition to that awarded by the High Court is quite reasonable. In our opinion, enhancement of the amount of compensation to this extent has to be made at this stage.
4. For the above reasons, the appellant is awarded a further sum of Rs. 4,00,000 with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of the claim till the date of payment in addition to the amount already awarded by the High Court.
5. The appeal is allowed with costs Rs. 5,000/-.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free