Sharmila Bagchi @ Gangopadhayay vs Sourav Gangopadhayay
- SCC(2022) 5 SCC 543
- Neutral2022 INSC 61
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A family court petition for divorce may be transferred from one territorial jurisdiction to another where: (1) the respondent spouse has received notice but made no appearance and filed no counter-affidavit, indicating lack of intention to contest the transfer; (2) the petitioner is residing in the jurisdiction of the court to which transfer is sought; (3) the petitioner has also filed related proceedings (such as a maintenance petition) in that jurisdiction; and (4) the overall circumstances make the transfer appropriate for the administration of justice. The transfer court retains power to modify or recall such an order within three months if it is later shown that the respondent was not properly served with notice.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
Transfer Petition (Civil) No 124 of 2020
Sharmila Bagchi @ Gangopadhayay Petitioner
Versus
Sourav Gangopadhayay Respondent
ORDER
1 The petitioner-wife seeks transfer of MAT Suit No 454 of 2018 titled “ Sourav
Gangopadhayay vs Sharmila Bagchi @ Gangopadhayay ”, which is a petition
for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 and is pending
before the Principal Judge (ADJ – V), Family Court Burdwan, West Bengal. The
petitioner-wife seeks the transfer of the above stated case to the Principal
Judge, Family Court, Shamli (U.P.).
2 This Court issued notice on 28 January 2020 to the respondent-husband and
stayed the further proceedings in the divorce case. As per the Office Report,
a notice sent through AD card, duly signed by the respondent has been
received back, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf so far. No
counter affidavit has thus been filed. It appears that the respondent-
husband is not keen to contest the instant transfer petition.
3 It is further revealed from the averments that marriage between the parties
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by DEEPAK SINGH Date: 2022.01.28 16:48:14 IST Reason: TP(C) 124/2020 2
was solemnized on 17 January 2017. The parties are doctors by profession.
There is no child born out of the wedlock. Taking into consideration the
averments made by the petitioner-wife that she is residing with her parents
in Shamli, U.P., where she has also filed maintenance petition, I deem it
appropriate to allow the present transfer petition. Ordered accordingly.
4 MAT Suit No 454 of 2018 titled “ Sourav Gangopadhayay vs Sharmila Bagchi
@ Gangopadhayay” pending before the Principal Judge (ADJ – V), Family
Court Burdwan, West Bengal is ordered to be transferred to the Family
Court, Shamli (U.P.). The records shall be transferred to the transferee court
forthwith.
5 The respondent-husband shall be entitled to seek modification/recall of this
order within a period of three months if it is found that he has not been
served with AD notice as reported by the Office.
6 The transfer petition is disposed of in the above terms.
7 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
…...….......………………........J. [Surya Kant]
New Delhi;
January 18, 2022 CKB TP(C) 124/2020 3
ITEM NO.8 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVI-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Transfer Petition (Civil) No.124/2020
SHARMILA BAGCHI @ GANGOPADHAYAY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SOURAV GANGOPADHAYAY Respondent(s)
(With appln.(s) for IA No.12522/2020-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.12523/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 18-01-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mujahid Ahmad, Adv.
Mr. Mohd. Irshad Hanif, AOR Mr. Aarif Ali Khan, Adv.
Mr. Danish Sher Khan, Adv.
Mr. Shishir Raj, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1 The transfer petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
2 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(CHETAN KUMAR) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) A.R.-cum-P.S. BRANCH OFFICER (Signed order is placed on the file)
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free