Sharad vs State Of Maharashtra
- SCC(2010) 15 SCC 560
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a single injury to the chest is inflicted during an altercation with no evidence of premeditation, serious intention to kill, or prior enmity, and the victim's death results from that injury, the offence falls under Section 304 Part-I I.P.C. (causing death by act endangering life or personal safety) rather than Section 302 I.P.C. (murder), notwithstanding that the injury was objectively capable of causing death and did in fact prove fatal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
The appellant herein was tried by the Ist Adhoc Additional
Sessions Judge, Wardha for the offence punishable under Section 302
and was sentenced for undergoing life imprisonment with a fine of
Rs.1,000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month.
The appellant then filed an appeal before the High Court and the
same was dismissed by the High Court. The appellant preferred this
appeal and at the time of issuing notice we have indicated that the
appeal is only confined to the question of nature of the offence.
Heard both sides.
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the
appellant was a young man aged about 20 years at the time of the
incident; and there was no pre-mediation or serious intention to
kill the deceased. Appellant had a quarrel with one Mukesh in which
one Manoj Kashyap and one Sanjay Pande intervened and separated them
each other. Thereafter the accused went from the place of incident
and he met Mukesh later and it appears that there was a quarrel
thereafter and the accused caused injury to Mukesh and he died. The
injury was on the left side of the chest near sternum between 3 rd and 4th rib. There is also another injury which is superficial in nature.
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that there is only one
injury and that too pursuant to the altercation and there is no
evidence to show that there was any previous enmity or not. The
appellant's contention is that the offence committed does not amount
to murder. Going by the injury sustained by the deceased and having
regard to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, in our
opinion, the offence committed by the appellant, at the most, comes
under Part -I of Section 304 I.P.C. We, therefore, set aside the
conviction of the appellant under Section 302 I.P.C. and find him
guilty under Section 304 Part-I of IPC and sentence him to undergo
imprisonment for 10 years. The appellant will undergo the remaining
period of sentence.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
..................CJI (K.G. BALAKRISHNAN)
...................J. (TARUN CHATTERJEE)
...................J. (Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN) NEW DELHI;
23RD OCTOBER, 2009
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free