Sewa Singh vs State Of Punjab
- SCC(2009) 17 SCC 575
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a co-accused who inflicted the fatal blow has been convicted under Section 304 Part-I IPC in a preceding appeal based on the peculiar facts of the case, a co-accused acting in concert with him and charged conjointly under Section 34 IPC must be convicted under the same section and not under Section 302 IPC. A sentence of life imprisonment imposed under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC must be reduced to eight years rigorous imprisonment where the court finds that the offence warrants conviction under Section 304 Part-I IPC based on the same peculiar facts that governed the conviction of the principal accused who dealt the fatal blow.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s)
ORDER
Leave granted.
The appellant along with one Jasmer Singh was prosecuted for commission
of offences under Sections 302, 323, 324, 326, 447, 149 and 148 of the Indian Penal
Code ('IPC', for short) for causing death of one Prem Singh and injuries to Bhag
Singh and Naib Singh. Jaasmer Singh was held guilty under Sections 302, 326/34,
324/34 and 447 IPC and was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine
of Rs. 5000 and, in default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for one year.
The appellant - Sewa Singh was convicted for commission of offences under Sections
302/34, 326, 324/34 and 447 IPC and was sentenced to life imprisonment and to pay a
fine of Rs. 5000 and, in default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for one
year.
-2- The appeal preferred by Jasmer Singh and others being Criminal Appeal
No. 551/2009, was disposed of by a Bench of this Court on 23.3.2009 in the following
terms:
"Heard learned counsel for the parties. Considering the peculiar facts of the case, we are of the view that the appropriate conviction would be under Section 304 Part-I, Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short' the IPC') and custodial sentence for 8 years would meet the end of justice. The appeal is disposed of."
In view of the fact that Jasmer Singh, who inflicted the fatal blow on the
deceased Prem Singh, has been found to be guilty of commission of offence under
Section 304 Part-I of the IPC, we have no other alternative but to hold the appellant
guilty for commission of offence under Section 304 Part-I of the IPC read with Section
34 and other provisions of the IPC, as noticed hereinbefore.
For selfsame reasons, we direct that the sentence of the appellant shall be
reduced to eight years rigorous imprisonment. He is directed to be released
immediately on completion of eight years rigorous imprisonment, if not required in
connection with any other case.
-3-
The appeal is partly allowed in the manner indicated above.
..........................J. [S.B. SINHA] ..........................J. [G.S. SINGHVI]
..........................J. [DEEPAK VERMA] New Delhi.
JULY 28, 2009.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free