Secretary, Sree Ujjini, J.S.V.V. Sangha vs R.H.M. Channabasava Swamy

This appeal is preferred against the Judgment of the learned Single Judge

of the High Court of Karnataka in Civil Revision Petition No. 4278/98. An Order

of the Education Tribunal was challenged before the learned Single Judge and

the same was set aside and hence this appeal by way of special leave.

The respondent was employed as a teacher in a school owned and

managed by the appellant. An order was passed against the respondent

terminating his service w.e.f. 21.8.1981. According to the appellant, the

respondent was then working on probation, though the respondent alleged that

his probation period was already over. The appellant had also contended that

the respondent teacher had offered his resignation voluntarily and his resignation

was accepted. The Tribunal came to the conclusion that the termination of the

services of the respondent, without there being a valid inquiry was not proper and

therefore, the termination of service of the respondent was set aside and he was

ordered to be reinstated to the post of 'Teacher' with full back wages from the

date of his termination.

The learned Single Judge before whom the matter came up for

consideration held that once the Tribunal had come to a conclusion that no

proper inquiry had been conducted in accordance with law, the matter should

have been remitted back to an Inquiry Committee to decide the issue. The

learned Single Judge, therefore, framed certain issues and appointed a District

Judge(Retd.) as Chairman of the Inquiry Committee. One representative each

from the appellant side and the respondent side were directed to be included in

the Inquiry Committee and the Committee was directed to complete the inquiry

within a period of six months. It was also directed that dismissal should be

treated as suspension and suspension allowance shall be paid in accordance

with law.

The order of the learned Single Judge is challenged before us.

We heard both sides. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of

the case, we do not think that the learned Single judge erred in remitting the

matter for further inquiry. However, we feel that the appointment of the

committee is not necessary for the purpose. The District Judge (Retd.)

appointed by the High Court can very well conduct the inquiry as Inquiry Officer.

The appellant shall pay a sum at the rate of Rs. 500/- per sitting to the Inquiry

Officer apart from other incidental expenses. The Inquiry shall be completed

within a period of six months. The Respondent shall be deemed to be under

suspension pending such enquiry.

Subject to the above modifications of the order passed by the learned

Single Judge, the appeal is dismissed, without any order as to costs.