Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Ruchika Swain vs Sandeep Kumar Mallick

Supreme Court4 October 2021S. Ravindra Bhat

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

When an application seeks transfer of matrimonial proceedings on grounds of inconvenience to the parties, the court may decline transfer and permit the proceedings to continue in the original forum where to do so would best serve the interests of justice, subject to the imposition of conditions designed to mitigate the hardship caused by inconvenience of distance, such as orders requiring one party to bear the other's expenses of travel, board and lodging necessitated by attendance at the forum.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.833 OF 2020

RUCHIKA SWAIN Petitioner

VERSUS

SANDEEP KUMAR MALLICK Respondent

O R D E R

This transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner-wife

seeking transfer of divorce petition filed by the respondent-

husband in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, Andhra

Pradesh to the Family Court, Cuttack, Odisha.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

This Court is of the opinion that the interest of justice

would be best subserved if the proceedings are allowed to continue

in the Court at Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh, subject to the

condition that the respondent-husband would pay to the petitioner-

wife a sum of Rs.10000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) for her

expenses on account of travel, boarding and lodging on the date(s)

of hearing or as and when her presence may be required by the Court

concerned. It is clarified that such amount shall be made over by

the respondent to the petitioner on every date when she attends the Signature Not Verified

Court at Vizianagaram.

Digitally signed by Dr. Mukesh Nasa Date: 2021.10.08 09:04:41 IST Reason: 2

Having regard to overall circumstances of the case, this Court

is of the opinion that the Court at Vizianagaram should decide

H.M.O.P. No.106/2019 on merits as expeditiously as possible and in

any case within a year from today.

The Transfer Petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.

........................J. [S. RAVINDRA BHAT]

NEW DELHI;

OCTOBER 04, 2021

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free