Ray Business Technologies Private Limited
- CitationRBI Compounding Order CA No. HYD 456
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
This is a compounding order under Section 15 of FEMA, not a decision of a court resolving a contested legal question, and the text sets out no legal reasoning beyond applying the regulatory provisions to admitted facts. The operative conclusions are that the applicant admitted the contravention of Paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to Notification No. FEMA 20(R)/2017-RB by refunding share application money beyond the 75-day period, and that a compounding amount was fixed under Section 13 and the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000, with the officer exercising discretion to take a lenient view. These are findings and exercises of discretion on the facts rather than a stated rule of law that the order rests on, so there is no ratio decidendi to extract beyond the proposition that a compounding application may be disposed of on the basis of an applicant's admitted contravention and declarations, subject to their veracity and without prejudice to other action if those declarations prove false.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date: October 24, 2019 C.A. HYD 456 In the matter of M/s Ray Business Technologies Private Limited Plot No.204, Block B, Kavuri Hills Next to IGNOU, Madhapur, Hyderabad - 500 033 (Applicant) In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section 1 of Section 15 of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Regulations/ Rules/ Notifications/ Orders made there under, I pass the following Order
The applicant has filed the compounding application dated September 12, 2019 received by us on September 13, 2019 for compounding of contraventions of the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) and the regulations issued thereunder. The contraventions sought to be compounded is delay in refund of share application money to the non-resident investor beyond 75 days from date of receipt of remittance in terms of Paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a person resident outside India) Regulations, 2000 notified vide Notification No. FEMA. 20(R)/2017-RB
Compounding of contraventions under FEMA 1999 M/s Ray Business Technologies Private Limited CA No. HYD 456 dated November 07, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as Notification no. FEMA 20(R)/2017-RB) as amended time to time.
2. The relevant facts of the case are as follows: a) The applicant is a resident company incorporated as Private Limited Company under the Companies Act, 1956 on October 12, 2009 (CIN: U72200TG2009PTC065423). The company is engaged in the business of “Other information technology and computer service activities n.e.c”. b) The applicant had received foreign inward remittance of ₹ 6,35,200/- from Mr. Eugene Canton Paden on January 31, 2018 and reported the same in form ARF on February 08, 2018 within the stipulated time. c) The applicant allotted equity shares and filed form FC-GPR as indicated below: S Name of investor Date of No. of Amount for Date of No allotment Shares which shares reporting of shares allotted allotted (INR) 1 Eugene Canton 28/03/2018 50,000 85,00,000 31/05/2018* Paden Total 85,00,000 * Late Submission Fee has been paid by the applicant to regularize the contravention of Regulation 13.1(2) of Schedule I of FEMA 20(R)/2017-RB dated November 7, 2017.
c) The applicant had allotted 50,000 partly paid equity shares for a total consideration of ₹ 85,00,000/- against an inward remittance of ₹ 6,35,200/-, which was less than 25% of the total consideration to be received upfront. The non-resident investor did not remit the balance consideration to the applicant. The applicant then approached RoC with a request for cancellation of the above mentioned allotment which was approved. Further, the applicant approached
Compounding of contraventions under FEMA 1999 M/s Ray Business Technologies Private Limited CA No. HYD 456 Authorised Dealer with a request for approval to refund the amount of ₹ 6,35,200/-on May 15, 2019, with a delay of 1 year 1 month approximately as indicated below in contravention of Paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 of FEMA 20(R)/2017-RB dated November 07, 2017. S.No Name of Amount of Date of receipt Date of request investor remittance (INR) for refund 1 Eugene Canton 6,35,200 31/01/2018 15/05/2019 Paden
3. (a) The applicant was given an opportunity for personal hearing vide Reserve Bank’s letter No. HY.FE.FID/ 938 /14.66.003/2018-19 dated October 22, 2019 for further submission in person and/or producing documents, if any, in support of the application. (b) The applicant appeared for personal hearing on October 23, 2019 during which Shri. M. Venkatesh, Executive (Finance & Accounts) and Shri. Sudheer Kumar, Chartered Accountant, represented the applicant. The authorized representatives of the applicant admitted the contraventions for which the compounding has been sought. During the personal hearing it was submitted that the delay was not wilful or with a malafide intention but was due to lack of awareness of FEMA provisions. In view of the foregoing, the representative of the applicant requested to take a lenient view in disposal of the application. The application for compounding is, therefore, being considered on the basis of the averments made in the application.
4. I have given my careful consideration to the documents on record. Accordingly, I hold that the applicant has contravened the following FEMA provisions issued in terms of:-
Compounding of contraventions under FEMA 1999 M/s Ray Business Technologies Private Limited CA No. HYD 456 (a) Paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to Notification No. FEMA 20(R)/2017-RB for delay in refund of share application money of ₹ 6,35,200/- to the non-resident investor and the period of contravention is 1 year 1 month approximately.
5. It has been declared in the compounding application dated September 12, 2019, that the particulars given by the applicant in the application are true and correct to the best of their knowledge and belief. It has been declared in the declaration dated September 12, 2019 furnished with the compounding application that the applicant was not under any enquiry/investigation/adjudication by any agency as on the date of the application and has, in this regard, not informed of initiation of any such enquiry/investigation/adjudication proceedings against it thereafter. It has further been declared that the applicant has not filed any appeal under section 17 or section 19 of FEMA 1999. Accordingly, the above contraventions which are being compounded in this Order are subject to the veracity of the above declarations made by the applicant and this order is without prejudice to any other action which may be taken by any authority under the extant laws if the said declarations are subsequently discovered to be false and/or incorrect.
6. In terms of Section 13 of the FEMA, any person contravening any provision of the Act shall be liable to a penalty up to thrice the sum involved in such contravention upon adjudication. However, taking into account the relevant facts and circumstances of the case as stated in the foregoing paragraphs, I am persuaded to take a lenient view on the amount for which the contravention is to be compounded and I consider that an amount of ₹ 53,494/- (Rupees Fifty Three Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Four Only) will meet the ends of justice.
7. Accordingly, I compound the admitted contravention, namely, the contravention of Paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to Notification No. FEMA 20(R)/2017-RB by the Compounding of contraventions under FEMA 1999 M/s Ray Business Technologies Private Limited CA No. HYD 456 applicant on the facts discussed above in terms of the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000 on payment of an amount ₹ 53,494/- (Rupees Fifty Three Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Four Only) which shall be deposited by the applicant with the Reserve Bank of India, Foreign Exchange Department, 1st Floor, Saifabad, Hyderabad - 500004 by a demand draft drawn in favour of the "Reserve Bank of India" and payable at Hyderabad within a period of 15 days from the date of this order. In case of failure to deposit the compounded amount within the above mentioned period, Rule 10 of the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000 dated May 03, 2000 shall apply.
The application is disposed of accordingly. Dated this 24th day of October 2019.
Sd/- (P Kalyan Chakravarthy) Assistant General Manager
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free