Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Ramgopal & Anr vs State Of M.P.& Anr

Supreme Court30 July 2010T.S. Thakur · Markandey Katju

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

An offence designated as non-compoundable under the Indian Penal Code cannot be quashed or the accused acquitted merely because the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, notwithstanding such settlement between them.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICITION
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 6494 OF 2010(CRLMP. NO.14745/2010)

RAMGOPAL & ANR. ...Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF M.P. & ANR. ...Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Issue notice.

The petitioners herein were convicted, inter alia,

under Section 326 IPC. We understand that the parties have

arrived at an amicable settlement. However, in view of the

fact that the offence mentioned in Section 326 is a non-

compoundable offence, we cannot straightway acquit the

petitioners the settlement between the parties,

notwithstanding.

There are several offences under the IPC that are

currently non-compoundable. These include offences

punishable under Section 498-A, Section 326, etc. of the

IPC. Some of such offence can be made compoundable by

introducing a suitable amendment in the statute. We are

of the opinion that the Law Commission of India could

examine whether a suitable proposal can be sent to the

Union Government in this regard. Any such step would not

only relieve the courts of the burden of deciding cases in

which the aggrieved parties have themselves arrived at a

settlement, but may also encourage the process of

re-conciliation between them. We, accordingly, request the

Law Commission and the Government of India to examine all

these aspects and take such steps as may be considered

feasible.

The Secretary General of this Court shall forthwith

send a copy of this order to the Law Commission of India as

well as to the Law Secretary to the Government of India.

The Law Secretary is requested to place a copy of this

order before the Hon'ble Minister of Law & Justice, Union

of India.

..........................................J. (MARKANDEY KATJU)

...........................................J. (T.S. THAKUR) New Delhi July 30, 2010

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free