Ramesh Kumar Suneja vs Pawan Buildwell Pvt Ltd & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 915 of 2020
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors, including a decision to liquidate the corporate debtor, is not justiciable and cannot be interfered with in the absence of any material irregularity in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process; a challenge that the sole creditor's decision was vindictive or mala fide does not displace that principle.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: Ramesh Kumar Suneja ....Appellant
Vs
Pawan Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Piyush Singh, Mr. Aditya Parolia and Mr. Akshay Srivastava, Advocates. For Respondents: ORDER
(Through Virtual Mode)
20.10.2020: This appeal is directed against order of liquidation in respect of
the Corporate Debtor passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company
Law Tribunal), New Delhi Bench (Court II). The issue raised is that the sole
creditor constitutes the Committee of Creditors and the decision taken to
liquidate the Corporate Debtor is vindictive and malafide.
2. It is trite law that the commercial wisdom of Committee of Creditors with
regard to a business decision in approval of Resolution Plan or sending the
Corporate Debtor into liquidation cannot be called in question and the same is
not justiciable. It is not permissible to sit over the decision of Committee of
Creditors when it decides to liquidate the Corporate Debtor, that too with 100%
voting share. Commercial wisdom is the domain of Committee of Creditors and
same is beyond the pale of challenge in so far as taking a business decision is
concerned. In absence of any material irregularity in Corporate Insolvency
Resolution Process, such decision cannot be interfered with. -2-
3. Shri Piyush Singh, learned counsel representing the Appellant submits
that Corporate Debtor is prepared to settle the claims of the Creditors. If that be
the case, the Corporate Debtor can take resort to provisions of Section 230 of the
Companies Act, 2013 even at the liquidation stage by floating Settlement Plan/
Scheme/ Compromise.
4. Keeping in view the submission made by learned counsel for the Appellant
and the fact that the Corporate Debtor intends to settle with the Creditors, we
dismiss the instant appeal with observation that the dismissal this appeal shall
not preclude the Corporate Debtor from advancing proposal or floating a
scheme/ settlement in terms of aforesaid provision. The appeal is accordingly
dismissed.
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Acting Chairperson
[Justice Jarat Kumar Jain] Member (Judicial)
[Dr. Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical)
am/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 910 of 2020
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free