Rajeswary Ramakrishnan vs V Venkata Sivakumar & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 622 of 2020
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where the only resolution plan received in the corporate insolvency resolution process was submitted by a prospective resolution applicant who is ineligible under Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, there is no valid resolution plan for consideration, and the Adjudicating Authority is left with no option but to order liquidation of the corporate debtor, even where the corporate insolvency resolution process has been extended beyond 330 days.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Rajeswary Ramakrishnan ...Appellant
Vs.
V. Venkata Sivakumar & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: - Mr. Sharath Chandran and Mr. Achyuth Ajith Kumar, Advocates.
For Respondents:- Sri V. Venkata Sivakumar, IRP. Ms. Deena Dhayalan, Advocate. Mr. S. Sathiya Narayanan, Advocate for R2.
ORDER
(Through Virtual Mode)
27.07.2020─ After hearing learned counsel for the Appellant, we find
that the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal),
Special Bench, Chennai has rightly declined to extend the Corporate
Insolvency Resolution Process period beyond 330 days holding that no
exceptional circumstances warranting such extension existed. It appears
that the only Resolution Plan received during the Corporate Insolvency
Resolution Process was one from Mr. Jayaram Chowdary who admittedly
owed Rs.192 Crores to the State Bank of India which had declared his
account as NPA in the year 2018 rendering him ineligible within the ambit
of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to be a
Resolution Applicant. It is a self-confessed ineligibility on the part of the
Contd/-..........
-2-
proposed Resolution Applicant Mr. Jayaram Chowdary and viewed in that
context that no exception can be taken to the observations made by the
Adjudicating Authority in the impugned order that there was no
Resolution Plan for consideration even within the extended period of
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process spanning 330 days. We find no
legal infirmity in the impugned order. In absence of a valid Resolution
Plan, the Adjudicating Authority was left with no option but to send the
Corporate Debtor into the liquidation.
In view of the foregoing observations, the appeal is dismissed.
However, we make it clear that this order will not preclude any eligible
person from floating a comprise/ scheme of arrangement within the
ambit of Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013 during the liquidation
process.
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Acting Chairperson
[V.P. Singh] Member(Technical)
[Shreesha Merla] Member(Technical) Ar/ g
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 622 of 2020
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free