Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Rajeshwari & Ors vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd & Anr

Supreme Court28 January 2011Deepak Verma · Dalveer Bhandari

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

For the age bracket of above 25 years but not exceeding 30 years as set out in the Second Schedule to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the prescribed multiplier of 18 shall be applied in calculating motor accident compensation, and where a deceased falls squarely within this age bracket at the time of the accident, the lower multiplier applied by a lower court cannot be justified.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1108-1109 OF 2011
(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.2575-2576/2010)
RAJESHWARI AND ORS. Appellant(s)
:VERSUS:
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR. Respondent(s)
O R D E R
Leave granted.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
These appeals emanate from the judgment and order
dated 17.3.2009 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand

at Nainital in Appeal From Order Nos.82/2007 and

109/2007.

The short question which falls for our

consideration is whether in the facts and circumstances

of the cases, the proper multiplier applied should be 16

or 18.

At the time of the incident, the age of the

deceased was 26 years. The Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Kashipur, while calculating the amount of

compensation applied the multiplier of 18. The amount of

compensation was reduced by the High Court by applying

the multiplier of 16 in the impugned judgment.

-2-

As per the Second Schedule appended to the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988, for the age of the deceased above 25

years but not exceeding 30 years, the multiplier given is

18. The age of the deceased at the time of accident was

26 years, therefore, appropriate multiplier should be 18.

Consequently, the impugned judgment passed by the High

Court is modified to this extent and the order of the

Tribunal is restored.

The entire balance amount of compensation, after

adjusting the amount already paid, shall be paid to the

appellants, within four weeks from today.

With the aforementioned observation and direction,

these appeals are disposed of.

.....................J (DALVEER BHANDARI)

.....................J (DEEPAK VERMA)

New Delhi;

January 28, 2011.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free