Rajeeb Kothari vs The State Of West Bengal
- Neutral2018 INSC 1074
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where the parties to criminal proceedings for offences involving dishonesty (fraud, breach of trust) have settled their disputes outside court and brought the matter before the Court seeking quashing of proceedings, the criminal trial should not be permitted to continue, and the proceedings may be quashed, on the basis that the trial court would in any case be obliged to take the settlement into consideration.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1408 OF 2018 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. 6082 OF 2018]
RAJEEB KOTHARI Appellant (s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant approached this Court since the
High Court declined to exercise its jurisdiction
under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The appellant sought
quashing of proceedings in GR Case No. 634 of 2001
pending on the file of Metropolitan Magistrate, 4 th
Court, Kolkata. It is the case of the appellant that
the disputes between the parties have been settled.
3. Despite service of notice, the second respondent,
who is the de-facto complainant, is not present.
There is no appearance as well. The learned counsel
appearing for the State, however, points out that the Signature Not Verified
trial is in progress. We are afraid, this contention Digitally signed by JAYANT KUMAR ARORA Date: 2018.12.24 16:40:06 IST Reason:
cannot be appreciated. This Court had granted stay
of the proceedings by order dated 10.08.2018. 2
4. We find that the appellant was chargesheeted
under Sections 406, 420 and 120B IPC. Now that the
parties have settled their disputes outside the
court, we do not find that there is any need for the
criminal proceedings to continue any further since in
any case, the trial court will have to take into
consideration the settlement. The appeal is, hence,
allowed.
5. Proceedings in GR Case No. 634 of 2001 on the file
of Metropolitan Magistrate, 4th Court, Kolkata are
quashed.
.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J. [ HEMANT GUPTA ]
New Delhi;
November 16, 2018.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free