Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Dharam Chand And Ors

Supreme Court27 August 2010R.M. Lodha · Aftab Alam

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a premium cheque for a motor insurance policy is received by the insurance company, the insurance cover is deemed to commence from the time of receipt of the cheque, not from any later date stated in the cover note issued simultaneously, and accordingly an accident occurring within a few hours of cheque receipt but before the date noted in the cover note as the commencement date is covered by the policy.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

`Non-Reportable'
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.5204 OF 2003

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Appellant

Versus

Dharam Chand & Ors. Respondents

JUDGMENT

AFTAB ALAM, J.

1. This appeal arises from a motor accident claim.

2. In this case, the premium cheque for the insurance policy was received

by the appellant, the insurance company, on May 7, 1998 at 4.00 pm and a

cover note was issued at the same time. In columns 3 & 4 of the cover note,

however, it was stated that the insurance would commence from May 8,

1998 and expire on May 7, 1999.

3. The motor accident in regard to which the claim case was filed took

place at 8:30 pm on May 7, 1998.

4. The insurance company sought to disown its liability on the plea that

the accident took place before the commencement of the insurance as

indicated in the cover note. But, both the Tribunal and the High Court, 2

turned down the plea and held the insurance company liable to pay the

compensation amount.

4. When this appeal was taken up, counsel for the insurance company

very fairly stated that since the cheque for the premium amount was received

by the company at 4:00 pm on May 7, 1998, the insurance must be deemed

to have commenced from that time and four hours later when the vehicle

met with the accident, the owner must be deemed to have been covered by

the insurance policy. We appreciate the fairness shown by the counsel for

the insurance company.

5. The appeal is dismissed but with no order as to costs.

....................................J. (AFTAB ALAM)

....................................J. (R.M. LODHA)

New Delhi August 27, 2010.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free