Neha Arun Jugadar & Anr vs Kumari Palak Diwan Ji
- SCC(2011) 15 SCC 222
- Neutral2011 INSC 121
- AIRAIR 2011 SC 1164
- SCR[2011] 2 SCR 907
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a party alleges that the court in which a case is pending has no jurisdiction to hear it, the appropriate remedy is to apply to that court itself for dismissal on the ground of lack of jurisdiction, not to seek a transfer of the case to another court. A transfer under the applicable transfer jurisdiction can only be granted where both the transferor and transferee courts possess jurisdiction over the matter, and the transfer is sought on grounds of convenience or the availability of witnesses at the alternative forum, not on grounds that the original court has no jurisdiction at all.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
being MACT No. 138 of 2009 pending at the District Judge
(MACT Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.) to the competent
Court at Pune, Maharashtra. The petitioners allege in the
petition that the MACT Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. has
no jurisdiction in the matter.
An order of transfer of a case can be passed where
both the courts, namely, the transferor court as well as
the transferee court, have jurisdiction to hear the case
and the party seeking transfer of the case alleges that the
transferee court would be more convenient because the
witnesses are available there or for some other reason it
will be convenient for the parties to have the case heard
by the transferee court. There is no question of transfer
of a case which has been filed in a court which has no
jurisdiction at all to hear it.
:1:
In a case where a party alleges that the court where
the case is pending has no jurisdiction, he should apply to
that court for dismissing it on this ground. There is no
question of transfer of such a case.
Hence, the petitioners herein may apply to the
District Judge (MACT Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.) for
dismissal of the case pending before it on the ground that
there is no jurisdiction in the Court to hear the case, and
if they do so, the Court concerned will decide the
application as a preliminary ground before proceeding to
hear the case on merits.
With these observations, the transfer petition is
dismissed.
.........................J. (MARKANDEY KATJU)
.........................J. (GYAN SUDHA MISRA) NEW DELHI;
FEBRUARY 14, 2011.
:2:
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free