Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Neha Arun Jugadar & Anr vs Kumari Palak Diwan Ji

Supreme Court14 February 2011Gyan Sudha Misra · Markandey Katju

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a party alleges that the court in which a case is pending has no jurisdiction to hear it, the appropriate remedy is to apply to that court itself for dismissal on the ground of lack of jurisdiction, not to seek a transfer of the case to another court. A transfer under the applicable transfer jurisdiction can only be granted where both the transferor and transferee courts possess jurisdiction over the matter, and the transfer is sought on grounds of convenience or the availability of witnesses at the alternative forum, not on grounds that the original court has no jurisdiction at all.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 182 OF 2011
NEHA ARUN JUGADAR & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
KUMARI PALAK DIWAN JI Respondent(s)
O R D E R
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
This Transfer Petition has been filed to transfer case

being MACT No. 138 of 2009 pending at the District Judge

(MACT Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.) to the competent

Court at Pune, Maharashtra. The petitioners allege in the

petition that the MACT Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. has

no jurisdiction in the matter.

An order of transfer of a case can be passed where

both the courts, namely, the transferor court as well as

the transferee court, have jurisdiction to hear the case

and the party seeking transfer of the case alleges that the

transferee court would be more convenient because the

witnesses are available there or for some other reason it

will be convenient for the parties to have the case heard

by the transferee court. There is no question of transfer

of a case which has been filed in a court which has no

jurisdiction at all to hear it.

:1:

In a case where a party alleges that the court where

the case is pending has no jurisdiction, he should apply to

that court for dismissing it on this ground. There is no

question of transfer of such a case.

Hence, the petitioners herein may apply to the

District Judge (MACT Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.) for

dismissal of the case pending before it on the ground that

there is no jurisdiction in the Court to hear the case, and

if they do so, the Court concerned will decide the

application as a preliminary ground before proceeding to

hear the case on merits.

With these observations, the transfer petition is

dismissed.

.........................J. (MARKANDEY KATJU)

.........................J. (GYAN SUDHA MISRA) NEW DELHI;

FEBRUARY 14, 2011.

:2:

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free