Mukesh Kishanpuria vs State Of West Bengal
- SCC(2010) 15 SCC 154
- Neutral2010 INSC 266
- AIRAIR 2011 SC Supp 380
- SCR[2010] 5 SCR 702
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A court has the inherent power to grant interim bail pending the final disposal of a regular bail application, and this power flows from the court's general power to grant bail read together with Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which protects personal liberty. A trial court deciding a bail application must do so uninfluenced by observations made by a higher court in a judgment rejecting an anticipatory bail petition in the same matter.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
2. This petition has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 26.03.2010 of the High Court of Calcutta whereby the petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner herein has been rejected.
3. We have gone through the impugned judgment and order and also perused the record. We also see no reason to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. However, the petitioner may apply for regular bail before the Court concerned and alongwith the said application, he may file an application for interim bail pending disposal of the regular bail application. We have made it clear on a number of occasions that the power to grant regular bail includes the power to grant interim bail pending final disposal of the regular bail application. This power is inherent in the power to grant bail, particularly in view of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. We are of the opinion that in view of Article 21 of the Constitution, a person should not be compelled to go to jail if he can establish prima facie that in the facts of the case he is innocent.
5. Hence, if the present petitioner applies for regular bail before the Court concerned, he may also file an application for interim bail alongwith the same, which application shall be decided on the same day on which it is filed, pending final disposal of the regular bail application.
6. We also make it clear that the Trial Court shall decide the bail application uninfluenced by any observation made by the High Court in the impugned order.
7. The special leave petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free