Mr.Avinash Vittal Suthar vs The State Of Karnataka
- Neutral2025:KHC:20127
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where investigation has been completed, charge sheet filed, the offences are triable by a Magistrate with maximum punishment of imprisonment for seven years, the accused has no prior criminal antecedents, and there is no allegation that money was transferred to or received by the accused, regular bail should be granted notwithstanding rejection by the Sessions Court.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
-1- NC: 2025:KHC:20127 CRL.P No. 6330 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6330 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
MR. AVINASH VITTAL SUTHAR S/O VITTAL SUTHAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT179/2, TAHASILDAR GALLI HUKKERI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT KARNATAKA - 591 309. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI RAJARAMA S, ADV.) AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY D K CEN CRIME POLICE STATION DAKSHINA KANNDA DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (SPP) Digitally signed by HIGH COURT BUILDING NANDINI M S DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI Location: BENGALURU - 560 001. HIGH COURT ...RESPONDENT OF KARNATAKA (BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL PETITION BY GRANTING REGULAR BAIL AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT - POLICE TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CONNECTION WITH CR.NO.11/2025 REGISTERED BEFORE DAKSHINA KANNADA CEN CRIME POLICE STATION ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K., MANGALURU, SITTING AT PUTTUR, D.K. FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 66(C), 66(D0 OF I.T. ACT, 2008 AND U/S 308, 318(4), 319(2) OF BNS, 2023, ON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE IMPOSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT. -2- NC: 2025:KHC:20127 CRL.P No. 6330 of 2025
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
ORAL ORDER
Accused No.2 in Crime No.11/2025 registered by
Dakshina Kannada CEN Crime Police Station, Dakshina
Kannada, for the offences punishable under Sections 66(C) and
66(D) of Information Technology Act, 2008 and Sections
308(6), 319(2), 318(4) and 3(8) of BNS, 2023, is before this
Court under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, seeking regular bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. FIR in Crime No.11/2025 was registered by Dakshina
Kannada CEN Crime Police Station, Dakshina Kannada, for the
aforesaid offences against unknown persons based on the first
information dated 03.03.2025 received from Radhakrishna
Nayak S/o late Purushothama Nayak. During the course of
investigation, petitioner herein was arrested on 10.03.2025 and
subsequently, remanded to judicial custody. His bail application
filed before the jurisdictional Sessions Court in -3- NC: 2025:KHC:20127 CRL.P No. 6330 of 2025
HC-KAR
Crl.Misc.No.5054/2025 was rejected on 05.04.2025. Therefore,
he is before this Court.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
investigation of the case is completed and charge sheet is
already filed. The maximum punishment for the alleged
offences is imprisonment for a period of seven years. Petitioner
has no other criminal antecedents. Accordingly, he prays to
allow the petition.
5. Per contra, learned HCGP has opposed the petition.
6. FIR in the present case was registered against unknown
persons. During the course of investigation, accused Nos.1 and
2 were arrested in the present case. After completing the
investigation, charge sheet has been filed against accused
Nos.1 and 2. The allegation in the charge sheet is that by
threatening the first informant that he was involved in a money
laundering case and he was under digital arrest, a sum of Rs.15
lakhs was transferred to the account of accused No.1 with the
assistance of accused No.2. Undisputedly, there is no allegation
that money has been transferred to the account of the -4- NC: 2025:KHC:20127 CRL.P No. 6330 of 2025
HC-KAR
petitioner. Investigation in the case is completed and charge
sheet has been filed. The alleged offences are triable by the
Court of Magistrate and the maximum punishment for the
alleged offences is imprisonment for a period of seven years.
Petitioner has no other criminal antecedents. Under the
circumstances, I am of the opinion that the prayer made by the
petitioner for grant of regular bail needs to be answered
affirmatively. Accordingly, the following order:-
7. The petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be
enlarged on bail in Crime No.11/2025 registered by Dakshina
Kannada CEN Crime Police Station, Dakshina Kannada, for the
offences punishable under Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of
Information Technology Act, 2008 and Sections 308(6), 319(2),
318(4) and 3(8) of BNS, 2023, subject to the following
conditions:
a) Petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for the likesum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;
-5- NC: 2025:KHC:20127 CRL.P No. 6330 of 2025
HC-KAR
b) The petitioner shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless the Trial Court exempts his appearance for valid reasons;
c) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses;
d) The petitioner shall not involve in similar offences in future;
e) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the
Trial Court without permission of the said Court until the
case registered against him is disposed off.
Sd/-
(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE
DN
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free