Mormugao Port Trust vs S. Srinivas Rao And Anr.
- SCC(2002) 9 SCC 711
- AIRAIR 2002 SC 2536
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Under Section 27 of the Major Port Trust Act, where the Government of India has prescribed under Clause (c) that the Chairman may make appointments in respect of posts with a maximum salary not exceeding Rupees One thousand nine hundred (exclusive of allowances), the Chairman possesses the power to create and make appointments to posts within that salary limit; accordingly, where the post of Assistant Engineer carries a maximum salary of Rs. 1580/-, the Chairman's power to create such a post is authorized by Section 27(c), and the High Court's quashing of the Chairman's order creating the post was erroneous.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 3-4-1997 made by the Bench at Panaji (Goa) of the High Court of Bombay.
2. A writ petition was preferred by the respondent-S. Srinivas Rao who was an employee on the establishment of the appellant as Head Draughtsman at the relevant time. He claimed promotion under the existing rules to the post of Assistant Engineer. That having not been granted, the respondent approached the High Court. The High Court though noticed that the writ petition lacked necessary details as to when the post of Assistant Engineer fell vacant or when he became eligible to be considered for the post of Assistant Engineer, the writ petition was liable to be dismissed, proceeded to consider the several questions raised in view of the importance of the matter.
3. The High Court examined the various provisions of the Major Port Trust Act and in particular Sections 27 and 28 thereof and the regulations framed thereunder. The High Court is of the view that under Section 27(a) and (b) the power to create different categories of posts is available only to the Board and the scheme under the Act is that the posts have been classified and powers to create topmost posts have been given to the Central Government while power to create other posts is given to the Board and the Chairman; that in the case of post of Assistant Engineer whose maximum salary is Rs. 1,000/- in the scale of Rs. 980-50-1330-EB-1930, the Board alone could create the post. On that basis the High Court held that the Chairman had no power to create the post and set aside the order made by him.
4. It is now brought to our notice by the learned Counsel for the appellant that the post of Assistant Engineer carries salary in the following scale Rs. 900-35-1040-40-1080-EB-40-1400-EB-45-1580 with effect from 1983 when the relevant regulations were amended. It is also made clear that in terms of Section 27(c) the Government of India prescribed that posts in respect of which the Chairman could make appointment up to Rupees One thousand nine hundred (exclusive of allowances). The maximum salary in respect of Assistant Engineer is fixed at Rs. 1580/- and it is only Clause (c) of Section 27 of the Act which was attracted. In that view of the matter, the High Court is plainly wrong in having quashed the order made by the Chairman creating the aforesaid post. Hence, this appeal is allowed setting aside the order made by the High Court. The appeal is allowed accordingly.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free