Meenu Tandon vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 65 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal treated the appeal against the recovery certificates as concluded in substance once the penalty orders had been affirmed by the Supreme Court: the adjudicating officer's order having attained finality, the penalty amount was payable, and the appellants' remedy lay in seeking a time-bound instalment schedule rather than in re-agitating liability. Where the adjudicating officer's order has been affirmed up to the Supreme Court and has thereby attained finality, the liability to pay the penalty imposed under it is not open to challenge before the Tribunal in an appeal against the consequent recovery certificates. A request for payment in instalments, made by a penalised party in view of its financial position, may be accommodated by the Tribunal in the exercise of its power to dispose of the appeal, by directing payment in a fixed schedule of instalments, with the bank and demat accounts defreezed upon payment of the second instalment and any favourable decision on the party's pending representations adjusted against the last instalment.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Date of Decision : 07.02.2022 Misc. Application No. 90 of 2022 And Appeal No. 65 of 2022 1. Meenu Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 2. Neera Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 3. Alankar Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 4. Gaurav Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 5. Girish Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 6. Ela Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 7. Badri Vishal Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 8. Akshat Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 9. Chavi Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 10. Surabhi Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 11. Paridhi Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 12. Damini Tandon 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 13. Alankar Udyog Private Limited 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 14. Electra Logistics Limited (earlier Tandon Investments Private Limited) 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. 15. Sahitya Bhawan Private Limited 33 Dayanand Marg, Allahabad 211 002. ..... Appellants Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. .....
Respondent Mr. Sajeve Deora, Chartered Accountant for the Appellant. Mr. Abhishek Khare, Advocate with Mr. Sharvil Kala, Advocate i/b Khare Legal Chambers for the Respondent. CORAM : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Justice M.T. Joshi, Judicial Member Per : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral) 3 1. We have heard Shri Sajeve Deora, Chartered Accountant for the appellant and Shri Abhishek Khare, the learned counsel with Shri Sharvil Kala for the respondent SEBI. The miscellaneous application for urgent hearing is disposed of. 2. 15 appellants have filed the present appeal against the recovery certificates dated November 29, 2021. It transpires that the appellants had acquired shares pursuant to the Rights Issue and inter se shareholding transfer amongst the promoter group for which a disclosure was required to be made and the same was made belatedly and therefore violated the provisions of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 ('Takeover Regulations' for short). Accordingly, after issuance of the show cause notice penalties of different amounts was imposed upon the appellants to be paid jointly and severally.
3. An appeal was filed before this Tribunal which was dismissed. The matter went upto the Supreme Court and the orders of the Adjudicating Officer ('AO' for short) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India ('SEBI' for short) was affirmed. Thus, the penalty amount became payable. After the dismissal of the appeal, the pandemic crept in and it was also stated that the Chairman of the Company Mr. Badri 4 Vishal Tandon was handling the matter who unfortunately died on July 12, 2021. The appellants were unaware of the matter and only came to known when the recovery proceedings were initiated by SEBI dated November 29, 2021 and thereafter efforts were being made to pay the amount inspite of the fact that the company is under an insolvency resolution process. 4. It has been stated that the penalties have been imposed to be paid jointly and severally whereas the amount of penalty should be segregated quo each appellant so that each individual could pay their share of the penalty. In this regard, letters have been written by the appellants in March 2020 as well as December 2021 to SEBI which remained unattended.
It has also been stated that Supreme Court while entertaining the appeal had also granted a stay and further made a request that during the pandemic period the interest should be waived. 5. Considering the submission we are of the opinion that the order of the AO has attained finality and therefore the penalty amount is required to be paid. In this regard a request was made by the appellants that considering the financial situation they may be permitted to pay the amount in installments. 6. Considering the aforesaid, and in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose of the appeal with the following directions:- It has been stated that the bank accounts, etc have been frozen. We accordingly direct SEBI to issue necessary instructions to the banks that the request of the appellants be entertained for the purpose of debiting the said amount to SEBI for this installment as well as for the second installment. (c) The balance amount along with interest shall be paid in five equal monthly installments of Rs. 15 lakh each on or before the 25th day of the month. The balance amount, if any, would be paid in the last installment.
(d) Any decision made by SEBI on the application of the appellants, if found favourable in favour of the appellants, will be adjusted in the last installment. (e) The bank accounts, demat accounts including trading accounts, lockers etc will be defreezed after the payment of the second installment. 7. The present matter was heard through video conference due to Covid-19 pandemic. At this stage it is not possible to sign a copy of this order nor a certified copy of this order could be issued by the registry. In these circumstances, this order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary on behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are directed to act on the digitally signed copy of this order. Parties will act on production of a digitally signed copy sent by fax and/or email. Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer Justice M.T. Joshi Digitally signed RAJALA byRAJALAKSHMI Judicial Member 07.02.2022 KSHMI HDate:
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free