Manojkumar Singhal vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No.312 of 2016
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The impugned order of the Whole Time Member, having been passed without recording or considering the appellant's submissions, cannot stand as against the appellant, and it is to be quashed and set aside qua the appellant and the matter restored to the Whole Time Member for a fresh decision on merits in accordance with law.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Date of Decision: 07/03/2018
Appeal No.312 of 2016
Manojkumar Singhal D-56, Arya Samaj Road, Uttamnagar, New Delhi. ... Appellant
Versus
The Whole Time Member Securities and Exchange Board of India Plot No.C4-A, 'G' Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ... Respondent
Mr. Varun Nathani, Advocate i/b Ms. Kirti Kothari, PCS for the Appellant.
Mr. Aditya Chitale a/w Mr. Pulkit Sukhramani and Ms. Vidhi Jhawar, Advocates i/b The Law Point for the Respondent.
CORAM : Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member
Per : Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral)
1.
This appeal is filed to challenge the order passed by the Whole
Time Member ("WTM" for short) of Securities and Exchange Board of
India ("SEBI" for short) on 2nd June, 2016. It is not in dispute that the
submissions made by the appellant are neither recorded nor considered
in the impugned order. In these circumstances, in our opinion, the
impugned order dated 2nd June, 2016 deserves to be quashed and set
aside qua the appellant and restored for fresh decision. 2
2. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 2nd June, 2016 is quashed
and set aside qua the appellant and the matter is restored to the file of
the WTM of SEBI for passing fresh order on merits and in accordance
with law.
3. Appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to
costs.
Sd/-
Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer
Sd/-
Dr. C.K.G. Nair Member 07/03/2018 prepared & compared by-dg
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free