M. Seetharama @ Seetharama Gowda vs The Manager Future General India Insurance Co. Ltd.
- Neutral2025 INSC 648
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
When assessing compensation for loss of future income in motor accident claims involving permanent disability, the court must: (1) determine the injured person's actual income by reference to contemporary wage standards for the relevant class of worker, applying incremental increases as established in precedent; (2) apply the assessed percentage of disability to that income; and (3) additionally apply a percentage for loss of future prospects (in this case 40%) to account for the claimant's reduced earning capacity over the remainder of the working life, calculated over the appropriate period and multiplied by 12 for monthly computation. Medical expenses actually proved by documentary evidence must be awarded in full, with an additional composite amount for ancillary claims such as special diet, conveyance and attendant charges that are not separately substantiated by bills. Compensation for pain and suffering in cases of severe permanent disability such as amputation must reflect the overall suffering endured, including the nature and extent of injuries and their functional impact, and is not limited by the amounts awarded by lower courts where those amounts do not adequately compensate for the gravity of the injury.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
2. The appellant was injured in an accident which occurred on 25.06.2015 when the bike he was riding collided with a jeep. The FIR was registered against the jeep driver who was driving on the right side at high speed as also rashly and negligently. The appellant having suffered multiple injuries was taken to a local CA @SLP(C) No. 14543 of 2023 hospital where he was discharged after first aid and then admitted to a specialist hospital where he spent one and a half months. The appellant produced medical bills and also asserted an income of Rs.12,000/- per month. The appellant was aged 38 years and he suffered Syme’s amputation. The Tribunal awarded a total amount of Rs. 6,60,000/- under various heads which was increased by the High Court to Rs.12,65,000/-.
3. Compensation under different heads as awarded by the High Court: -
Sr. No. Heads of Claim Amount 1. Loss of income. Rs.8,10,000/-
Rs.9000 x 12 x 15 x 50%
2. Medical expenses. Rs.1,90,000/-
3. Loss of income during laid Rs. 45,000/-
up period.
4. Loss of amenities. Rs. 75,000/-
5. Future medical expenses. Rs.25,000/-
6. Pain and suffering. Rs.1,20,000/-
Total amount Rs.12,65,000/-
CA @SLP(C) No. 14543 of 2023 4. The High Court had confirmed the order of the Tribunal which awarded an amount of Rs. 1,20,000/- for pain and suffering. As is evident from the order of the Tribunal, the appellant suffered multiple injuries and had a fracture in the right femur, right clavicle, right tibia and fibula with vascular compromise. Considering the over-all suffering as also the amputation which was at the ankle joint, preserving the heel pad to allow for weight bearing; which is what a Syme’s amputation is, the compensation for pain and suffering can be increased to Rs. 1,50,000/-.
5. As far as medical expenses, despite producing bills for Rs. 1,86,486/-, the Tribunal and the High Court only awarded an amount of Rs. 1,90,000/; including for special diet, conveyance and attendant charges. This Court is of the opinion that the medical bills proved has to be granted in full and for special diet, conveyance CA @SLP(C) No. 14543 of 2023 and attendant charges a composite amount of Rs.
30,000/- can be awarded.
6. For loss of future income, the Tribunal adopted an income of Rs. 7,000/- which was enhanced to Rs. 9,000/- by the High Court. Ramachandrappa v. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd.1, (supra) was a case in which even a coolie’s income was determined at Rs. 4,500/- in the year 2004. As has been held in Pranay Sethi2, there can be an incremental increase for every year which at the least will be at Rs.500/- for every successive year. Taking that into account, the salary of an unskilled worker will be Rs.10,000/- in the year 2015 when the accident occurred. The claimant had produced income certificate and PW3 was examined to prove the same. The Tribunal, however, disbelieved PW3. But, in any event, the income of the injured can be fixed at Rs. 10,000/-. When assessing his loss of income 1
(2011) 13 SCC 236
2
(2017) 16 SCC 680
CA @SLP(C) No. 14543 of 2023 for 50% disability, as held by the High Court, necessarily, 40% for future prospects has to be added.
We find no reason to increase the percentage of disability as assessed by the Doctor. The amounts granted will be as under:-
Sr. No. Heads of Claim Amount 1. Pain and suffering Rs.1,50,000/-
2. Medical expenses. Rs.1,86,486/-
3. Special diet, conveyance and Rs.30,000/- attendant charges.
4. Loss of amenities. Rs.10,000/-
5. Loss of future income. Rs. 12,60,000/-
Rs. 10,000/- x 140% x 12 x 15 x 50% 6. Future medical expenses. Rs. 25,000/-
7. Loss of income during Rs. 45,000/- hospitalization.
Total amount Rs.17,06,486/-
7. The awarded amounts shall be paid within a period of two months from today with interest @ 9% per annum and whatever amounts have already been paid CA @SLP(C) No. 14543 of 2023 shall be deducted. The appellant shall provide the bank account details to the Insurance Company who shall transfer the amount online within the period specified hereinabove.
8. The Appeal stands allowed with the above directions.
9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
…………..……………, J.
[SUDHANSHU DHULIA]
……………..……………, J.
[K. VINOD CHANDRAN]
NEW DELHI;
MAY 08, 2025.
CA @SLP(C) No. 14543 of 2023
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free