M/S Toyota Motor Corporation vs Commr.Of Income Tax
- SCC(2008) 17 SCC 535
- Neutral2008 INSC 974
- AIRAIR 2009 SC Supp 172
- SCR[2008] 12 SCR 943
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an Assessing Officer passes an order disposing of penalty proceedings initiated under the Income Tax Act without recording reasons and merely stating that the proceedings are dropped, the High Court may remand the matter to require the Assessing Officer to pass a reasoned order, taking into account all relevant materials and aspects placed before him by the assessee. The Tribunal cannot substitute its own reasoning in place of the reasons that are required to be recorded by the Assessing Officer in the first instance.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5313 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.21772/2008 (CC No.11258/2008)
M/S. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION PETITIONER(S)
Versus
COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX RESPONDENT (S)
JUDGMENT
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Delay condoned.
Leave granted.
We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court.
The High Court has held that the Assessing Officer had disposed the proceedings
stating the penalty proceedings initiated in this case u/s 271 C read with Section 274 of
the Income Tax Act, 1961 are hereby dropped. According to the High Court, there
was no basis indicated for dropping the proceedings. The Tribunal referred to certain
aspects and held that the initiation of proceedings under Section 263 of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the I.T.Act) was impermissible when considered in the
background of the materials purportedly placed by the assessee before the Assessing
Officer. What the High Court has done is to require the Assessing Officer to pass a
-2- reasoned order. The High Court was of the view that Tribunal could not have
substituted its own reasonings which were required to be recorded by the Assessing
Officer. According to the assessee all relevant aspects were placed for consideration
and if the officer did not record reasons, assessee can not be faulted.
We do not think it necessary to interfere at this stage. It goes without saying
that when the matter be taken up by the Assessing Officer on remand, it shall be his
duty to take into account all the relevant aspects including the materials, if any, already
placed by the assessee, and pass a reasoned order.
The appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid observations.
......................J. (Dr.Arijit Pasayat)
......................J. (Dr.Mukundakam Sharma)
New Delhi, August 25, 2008
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free