Miss Lucy
← All judgments

M/s Milk Mantra Dairy Pvt. Ltd.

Reserve Bank Of India3 May 2000

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The compounding authority holds that a contravention of paragraph 9(1)(B) of Schedule I to Notification No. FEMA 20/2000-RB, consisting of filing Form FC-GPR after the prescribed 30-day period following the issue of shares to non-resident persons, is established where the applicant has admitted the delay, and may be compounded under the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000 on payment of a sum fixed by the authority in the exercise of its discretion, having regard to the relevant facts and circumstances of the case. Where the applicant has made declarations of truth and absence of pending proceedings in its compounding application, the compounding order is conditional on the veracity of those declarations, and is without prejudice to any other action that may be taken if they are later found to be false or incorrect.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

In theReserve Bank of IndiaForeign Exchange DepartmentPandit Jawaharlal Nehru MargBhubaneswar-751 001

Present Shri M.K. Mall Regional Director (Odisha) and Chief General Manager (Bhubaneswar) Compounding Authority Date: March 13, 2019 C.A. No. BHU18/2018 In the matter of M/s. Milk Mantra Dairy Pvt. Ltd. 7th Floor, Z Tower, Patia, Bhubaneswar-751024 (Applicant) In exercise of the powers under Section 15 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Regulations/Rules/Notifications/Orders made thereunder, I pass the following Order The applicant has filed a compounding application dated November 08, 2018 and addendum dated January 21, 2019 for compounding of contraventions of the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (the FEMA) and the regulations issued thereunder. The contravention sought to be compounded is delay in submission of Form FC-GPR to the Reserve Bank after issue of shares in terms of paragraph 9(1)(B) of Schedule I to Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a Person Resident Outside India) Regulations, 2000 notified, vide Notification No.FEMA 20/2000-RB dated May 3, 2000 and as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as Notification No.FEMA 20/2000-RB).

M/s. Milk Mantra Dairy Pvt. Ltd. CA No. BHU18/2018 2. The relevant facts of the case are as follows: The applicant was incorporated on August 04, 2009 and deals in carrying on the business of dairy and dairy related products. The applicant received inward remittances from foreign investors under automatic route and allotted shares and filed Form FC-GPR with Reserve Bank/AD Bank as indicated below. Sr. Amount of No of Shares Date of Date of Delay in No. receipt of Issued (₹) issue of Reporting to reporting inward shares RBI/AD beyond remittance (₹) bank under stipulated para 9(1) B period of 30 of erstwhile days under FEMA 20 para 9(1) B of erstwhile FEMA 20 1. 16,89,04,360.44 4,33,166 26.06.2014 22.08.2014 26 days 2. 16,89,04,318.32 4,33,166 01.01.2015 22.02.2015 21 days 3. 8,06,90,136.87 2,06,935 26.06.2014 22.08.2014 26 days 4. 8,06,90,136.87 2,06,935 01.01.2015 22.02.2015 21 days Total 49,91,88,952.50 12,80,202 The applicant filed the Form FC-GPR, on allotment of shares, with the Reserve Bank of India / Authorized Dealer Bank, with delays ranging from 21 days to 26 days, beyond the prescribed period of 30 days, as indicated above. Whereas, in terms of Paragraph 9(1)(B) of Schedule I to Notification No.FEMA 20/2000-RB dated May 3, 2000, an Indian company issuing shares in accordance with these Regulations, has to submit to Reserve Bank of India, a report in Form FC-GPR, along with documents prescribed therein, within 30 days from the date of issue of shares to persons resident outside India.

3. The applicant was given an opportunity for personal hearing vide the Reserve Bank’s letter FED(Bhu)No.395/08.02.266/2018-19 dated March 06, 2019 for M/s. Milk Mantra Dairy Pvt. Ltd. CA No. BHU18/2018 further submission in person and/or producing documents, if any, in support of the application. However, the applicant, vide its letter dated March 08, 2019 has opted out from appearing in personal hearing stating that they have already submitted their comments and documents with the compounding application and they have nothing new to produce before the authority. The applicant, in the compounding application, had admitted the contraventions as stated in para 2 above for which compounding has been sought. The application for compounding is, therefore, being considered on the basis of the averments made in the application as well as other documents and submissions made in this context by the applicant.

4. I have given my careful consideration to the documents on record and submission made by the applicant in the compounding application. Accordingly, I hold that the applicant has contravened the FEMA provisions issued in terms of Paragraph 9(1) (B) of Schedule 1 to Notification No. FEMA 20/2000-RB due to the delay in submission of Form FC-GPR to the Reserve Bank after issue of shares to persons resident outside India and the contravention relates to total amount of ₹ 49,91,88,952.50 (Rupees Fort Nine crore Ninety One lakh Eighty Eight thousand Nine hundred Fifty Two and Fifty paise only) with delays ranging from 21 days to 26 days, approximately.

5. It has been declared in the compounding application dated November 08, 2018 that the particulars given by the applicant in the application are true and correct to the best of their/his/her knowledge and belief. It has been declared in the declaration furnished with the compounding application that the applicant was not under any enquiry/investigation/adjudication by any agency as on the date of the application and has, in this regard, not informed of initiation of any such enquiry/investigation/adjudication proceedings against it/him/her thereafter. It has further been declared that the applicant has not filed any appeal under section 17 or section 19 of FEMA, 1999. Accordingly, the above contravention which is being compounded in this Order is subject to the veracity of the above declarations made by the applicant and this order is without prejudice to any other action which may be taken

M/s. Milk Mantra Dairy Pvt. Ltd. CA No. BHU18/2018 by any authority under the extant laws if the said declarations are subsequently discovered to be false and/or incorrect.

6. In terms of Section 13 of the FEMA, 1999 if any person contravening any provision of the Act, or contravenes any rule, regulation, notification, direction or order issued in exercise of the powers under this Act, or contravenes any condition subject to which an authorization is issued by the Reserve Bank, he, upon adjudication, shall be liable to a penalty up to thrice the sum involved in such contravention. However, taking into account the relevant facts and circumstances of the case as stated in the foregoing paras, I am of the view that an amount of ₹51,000/- (Rupees Fifty One thousand only) will meet the ends of justice.

7. Accordingly, I compound the admitted contravention namely, the contravention of Paragraph 9(1) (B) of Schedule 1 to Notification No. FEMA 20/2000-RB dated May3, 2000 by the applicant on the facts discussed above in terms of the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000 on payment of an amount of ₹51,000/- (Rupees Fifty One thousand only) which shall be deposited by the applicant with the Reserve Bank of India, Foreign Exchange Department, Bhubaneswar by a demand draft drawn in favour of the “Reserve Bank of India” and payable at Bhubaneswar within a period of 15 days from the date of this order. In case of failure to deposit the compounded amount within the above mentioned period, Rule 10 of the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000 dated May 3, 2000 shall apply. The application is disposed of accordingly. Dated this 13th day of March, 2019. Sd/- (M.K. Mall) Regional Director (Odisha) and Chief General Manager (Bhubaneswar)

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free