M/S ESKAG SANJEEVANI PVT LTD Vs JANAKPURI SUPER SPECIALTY HOSPITAL SOCIETY THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR
- Citation2024 SCC OnLine Del 8572
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an arbitration agreement exists in a contract and the parties have failed to constitute an arbitral tribunal by mutual agreement, the court may appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, notwithstanding that the agreement provides for appointment by one party (here, the hospital Director), provided the arbitration clause is sufficiently clear and the conditions precedent to arbitration have been satisfied. The respondent is entitled to raise preliminary objections regarding the arbitrator's jurisdiction and the arbitrability of the disputes, which shall be decided by the arbitrator in accordance with law.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ‘the A&C Act’) seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The disputes between the parties have arisen in the background of a Contract bearing no. F1(1)/Pur/JSSHA/17-18/358 dated 18.09.2018 relating to the installation, operation and management of a ‘Hemodialysis facility’ in the Department of Nephrology at the Janakpuri Super Speciality Hospital (respondent/hospital). 2.
Section IX (9) of the tender enquiry document contains an arbitration
clause as under:“9. Arbitration a) If dispute or difference of any kind shall arise between the purchaser and the service provider in connection with or relating to the contract, the parties shall make every effort to resolve the same amicably by mutual consultations.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:04.12.2024 13:03:27
ARB.P. 1623/2024
Page 1 of 3
b) If the parties fail to resolve their dispute or difference by such mutual consultations within thirty days of commencement of consultations, then either the purchaser or the service provider may give notice to the other party of its intention to commence arbitration, as hereinafter provided. The applicable arbitration procedure will be as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 of India. In that event, the dispute or difference shall be referred to the sole arbitration of an officer to be appointed by the Director, JSSHS as the arbitrator. If the arbitrator to whom the matter is initially referred is transferred or vacates his office or is unable to act for any reason, he/she shall be replaced by another person appointed by The Director, JSSHS to act as Arbitrator. Such person shall be entitled to proceed with the matter from the stage at which it was left by his predecessor. c) Work under the contract shall, notwithstanding the existence of any such dispute or difference, continue during arbitration proceedings and no payment due or payable by the Purchaser or the service provider shall be withheld on account of such proceedings unless such payments are the direct subject of the arbitration. d) Reference to arbitration shall be a condition precedent to any other action at law.”
3.
Disputes between the parties have arisen on account of alleged
outstanding monetary entitlement of the petitioner, for which the petitioner sent a legal notice on 24.05.2024. 4.
The disputes having remained unresolved, the petitioner finally issued
a notice invoking arbitration on 11.06.2024. However, an arbitral tribunal could not be constituted by the parties. Hence the present petition has been filed. 5.
Since the existence of the arbitration agreement is evident from a
perusal of the Agreement, there is no impediment to appointing an independent Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties as prayed for, and as mandated in terms of the judgments of the Supreme Court in Perkins Eastman Architects DPC v. HSCC (India) Ltd. (2020) 20 SCC 760, TRF Limited v. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd, (2017) 8 SCC 377, Bharat Broadband Network Limited v. United Telecoms Limited., 2019
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:04.12.2024 13:03:27
ARB.P. 1623/2024
Page 2 of 3
SCC OnLine SC 547 and Interplay between Arbitration Agreements under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 & the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, In re, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1666 and SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning 2024 INSC 532. 6.
Accordingly, Mr. Siddhant Nath, Advocate (Mob. No.: +91
9910870397) is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. 7.
The respondent shall be entitled to raise preliminary objections as
regards jurisdiction/arbitrability, which shall be decided by the learned arbitrator, in accordance with law. 8.
It is agreed by the parties that the arbitration shall be conducted under
the rules and aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), and the payment of arbitrator's fees and costs, shall also be governed by the said rules. It is directed accordingly. 9.
It is made clear that the observations in this order shall not be
construed as an expression of opinion, of this Court, on the merits of the matter. 10.
All rights and contentions of the parties are left open to be considered
by the learned Sole Arbitrator. 11.
The present petition stand disposed of in the above terms.
SACHIN DATTA, J NOVEMBER 21, 2024/DN
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:04.12.2024 13:03:27
ARB.P. 1623/2024
Page 3 of 3
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free